Jump to content
SAU Community

Highing flowing Injectors Good or Bad??


Recommended Posts

darrinspencer, I dont think I understand what you were hoping to achieve with this thread.

All replies have been along the same line, dont trust a salesman, dont trust highflows, and dont trust anyone telling you you can get 590cc out of stock injectors with a drill to within 1cc. To top it off, they slam denso injectors? (are the stock ones denso aswell?) - yet you then say words to the effect that 'these guys know what they are doing'.

If you truely believed that, why even ask others opinions????? Like I said, I sort of fail to see what you were hoping to achieve with this thread? Am I missing something?

sounds pretty sus, ah well if i was u i'd get a set of nismo 740cc injectors brand new from nengun, i got them for $994 delivered...there higher cc if u wanna do bigger upgrades, they're new, and not dodgy...just my opinion...

cheers...ben.

Guest darrinspencer
I think he was after first hand experience.

Adam

Exactly Adam

I was after first hand experience

Not a bunch of guys who have never tried it or seen them used with a opinion

Steve- Does not matter where you go a salesman will always tell you his product is better or the best way to do the job. Is a Ford better then a Holden, ask the salesman, he will tell you.

I wanted some first hand experience, I am not a injector expect and by the answers in this thread, either is anyone else.

Even though this isnt a first hand experience, the place I am looking at getting my injectors high flowed, and where i get all my work done, currently has a R33 gtst with highflowed injectors.

The results were apparently quite good. I dont have the exact figures, but I was told by my mate who works there that after getting them done they were able to make more power and with less injector duty. This car regularly competes at various track days here in melb, and is daily driven.

I was also told the method of highflowing was drilling them out by a thou.

Adam

darrinspencer, there is no way in hell that they will get the injectors within 1cc - if they are liing about that, what else.

but hey, its your car.

Oh, and I think B-man had some high flows in his car - lost his ringlands, it may be worth asking him what he thought of them. He is running aftermarket injectors now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...