Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Bumping an old thread... But I just did this today to pass the weekend. The smaller pipe is normally hidden so I started on that for practice by the larger pipe I got the idea. I found it easier and neater to wrap around then snip and then over lap it with the next strip; just make sure you make the snip on the part that is not visible easily and it'll look nice. Used almost all 10m's of it.

Also, I noticed if you angle away from a bend to begin with and by the end of it'll be facing the other direction. That info helped me get it looking a little neater/even by the end of it.

i.e: if the bend is an:

L

Then if you're starting from the horizontal part, start the strip like this:

\

and once it wraps around it'll be in this direction:

/

I'm also painting them black to stop it from standing out so much it holds paint quite well, I was almost tempted not to because it does look pretty damn cool - like something off a space craft :). The paint isn't completely done yet, I'm going to smooth it out a bit and re coat it tomorrow for a nicer finish.

I left the bend out of the intercooler untouched as you can see it through the black mesh of the type m front bar which looks quite nice.

Pics below:

Before:

SDC12140.jpg

After:

SDC12143.jpg

Paint:

SDC12146.jpg

SDC12149.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Does anyone have any numbers in regards to this stuff yet? The OP menitoned he's of the datalogger type, but hasn't posted anything about actual temps.

I have 2 theories:

One results in a cooler charge.

One results in a hotter charge.

I wouldn't mind looking at this modification further myself, I assume the tar is hard to remove after installation, therefore I'll have to wait. :(

Does anyone have any numbers in regards to this stuff yet? The OP menitoned he's of the datalogger type, but hasn't posted anything about actual temps.

I have 2 theories:

One results in a cooler charge.

One results in a hotter charge.

I wouldn't mind looking at this modification further myself, I assume the tar is hard to remove after installation, therefore I'll have to wait. :)

While I don't have numbers, I've noticed after doing this I swear I can feel a noticeable temperature change from the start of the unshielded crossover pipe, to the throttle body and from the throttle body to the manifold. Obviously this means a considerably lower temperature in the pipes. I do really want to bypass the coolant feed to the throttle body too.

I got a small thermocouple I can use to measure the temperatures I'll do it when I can, I have an exam in 12 days I have to study for now though.

Out of curiosity, what is your theory resulting in a hotter charge?

EDIT: BTW for those who are interested the pipes look pretty good now they're installed, you can see the pics in my garage.

While I don't have numbers, I've noticed after doing this I swear I can feel a noticeable temperature change from the start of the unshielded crossover pipe, to the throttle body and from the throttle body to the manifold. Obviously this means a considerably lower temperature in the pipes. I do really want to bypass the coolant feed to the throttle body too.

I got a small thermocouple I can use to measure the temperatures I'll do it when I can, I have an exam in 12 days I have to study for now though.

Out of curiosity, what is your theory resulting in a hotter charge?

EDIT: BTW for those who are interested the pipes look pretty good now they're installed, you can see the pics in my garage.

i think you will find that while the pipe is cooler, the amount of temperature difference in the actual air temp is minimal. the reason being that the air is flowing through that pipe at such a speed that the relatively small surface area of metal won't be having much of an effect on the large amount of air. now i'm not saying it wouldn't have any effect on the air temp, but nowhere near as much as is thought by some people. the air is flowing through that pipe in relatively short time, and there is a large volume of it. the principle is the same as how you can touch something hot very fast and not feel the heat, but if you touch it for a longer period of time you will.

  • 4 months later...
i think you will find that while the pipe is cooler, the amount of temperature difference in the actual air temp is minimal. the reason being that the air is flowing through that pipe at such a speed that the relatively small surface area of metal won't be having much of an effect on the large amount of air. now i'm not saying it wouldn't have any effect on the air temp, but nowhere near as much as is thought by some people. the air is flowing through that pipe in relatively short time, and there is a large volume of it. the principle is the same as how you can touch something hot very fast and not feel the heat, but if you touch it for a longer period of time you will.

this is what i intially thought, it would be great if someone could give some actual before and after air temps, ie, temperatures of the air that is just about to flow into the throttle body with and without the shielding. :)

  • 2 months later...

when i did this, only on crossover pipe... i covered it with duct tape first, to make it a little easier if i ever want to remove the flashtac, however mine has started to melt the tar on the bend of the pipe... fyi :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What ECU is on your car @silviaz? You can just change the idle target table yourself and the IACV duty cycle. Noting that if you play around with the screw you'll also need to revisit the idle base duty table as you will end up offsetting the lot. Another reason why DBW is superior, there's less mucking about.
    • Yep. Saw that on the image above but, wonder if it makes more sense to clean out the iacv because let's say in theory mine is dirty and if I clean it the rpm will drop. If I first go to my tuner to drop the rpm and then go to clean my iacv won't it drop further or is the rpm a fixed number?
    • Yeah it was a good result, and confirming the car is full of fluids and all interior etc in, other than fuel. I think a few pages back (maybe many pages!) he mentioned some serious lightening in the doors with the chassis punch, might have been done elsewhere I hadn't seen yet too
    • He still had the suspension dialled in for him! I would have sworn the lowest weight he ever got to was 1300kg though Maybe Neil had been drilling a LOT of holes somewhere you haven't found yet... 😛 Or has he also drained all the gearbox and diff oil out too, between it, and a tank full of fuel there's about 65kg to 70kg to add back in I'd guess. 😛
    • Yeah this isn't a super complex shape, but I was still happy to buy instead of fab version 1; very little in a modern can is a flat surface, and that is true here again - the undertray has about 50mm in height differences that I would have had to work out myself. I will probably make something more substantial before it does any rally, I don't think 1mm steel is too much use as a bash plate. There is also cooling to think about, Z1 have done a bit of development and have some air holes and louvers in the shape, will see how that works out too
×
×
  • Create New...