Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering what sort of Km's people are getting out of there 200+kW R33 gts-t's? and what A/R ratios are at full boost.

my car has 224rwkw@6500rpm on 18psi boost, (can get 238 running 22psi, but no thanks)and even though I never expected great fuel economy.....i thought it would be better than what I'm getting, even just cruising round granny shifting I'm LUCKY to get 300km out of a tank.

car mods (power relevent):

RB25DET....obvioulsy..

Blitz S/S mesh Air pod

Front mount HKS Intercooler

HiFlowed Turbo (steel wheels, larger wheels etc....)

Largest Bosch intank fuel pump available (cant remember number)

Malpassi adjustable fuel reg

standard injectors (just maxing out at full boost)

still standard BOV (seems to work ok...any thoughts?)

HKS Dump pipe

Blitz stainless 3"front pipe

Kakimoto 3" cat back exhaust

and a Microtech LTX-12 with controller running it all

I've heard of cars running greater kW than mine getting better fuel economy than me....so whats evenyone else doing that I'm not? or are most of us in the same boat?

Cheers :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45441-200kw-fuel-economy/
Share on other sites

i was getting 350 klm's from a tank in my R33 Gtst @ 170rwkw.

My R33 GTR made 235rwkw and when my power fc is tuned nicely (as its really not atm) I will get early 300's.

I know neither of those are like your setup, but it may help.

You may find that the microtech isn't helping things unless the LT series actually have closed loop mixture control at cruise.

Piggybacks and pfcs retain this function which is one reason they can still give decent fuel economy.

186rwkw R33 GTS-t and get anywhere between 400-640km depending on my driving style. (The 640km stint was done on the way down to the Summernats and back so basically 85% highway driving)

I drive around on 7psi tho with a standard ECU (rich), big difference to 18psi :)

I have no idea how much power mine is making (or "was" I should say, my coils are dying now...) but I'm averaging around 450-500km to a tank. That's with a T3/4, pod, and a PowerFC that's pretty much on the base map (I tidied it up a bit but nothing much). When the car was 100% stock (stock exhaust, stock everything) I managed a 900+ km trip (which was nearly all highway km's) on one tank.

All things being equal, you could make 600hp out of your engine, and still retain acceptable fuel economy. It all depends on how much of that power you use, and how often :) One other point to make - be proactive about your driving. Look ahead, and prepare for things before you get to them, don't wait until you're already there and then react to them.

When I'm driving along on the highway or whatever, I always back off the throttle to the point JUST BEFORE the car will start to slow down, rather than backing off until the car stops picking up speed or just holding your foot in one place. As you approach a hill (not once you're already at it), give just enough throttle to get the turbo spooling lightly and let the car hold speed up the hill. A lot of people get to the hill, the car slows down a bit, and they react to the car's slowing down by accelerating back up to the limit, which uses more fuel and is nowhere near as smooth. If you get caught in heavy traffic, smooth out the stop-start movement by averaging the speeds the cars in front are doing. They'll go between 0 and say 20km/h, you could sit on around 10km/h in first gear, idling along, using bugger all throttle and reducing the number of times you have to start from standstill. These kinds of things becomes second nature and do make a big difference to fuel economy.

The microtech doesn't use a closed loop oxygen sensor.

Thats the problem with your fuel economy.

This is why i'm going for a PowerFC; wolf 3d also has support for closed loop oxygen sensor however it lacks the sequential injection that also helps improve fuel economy and a little better power (supposively).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
    • I still have an old R32R left over from when they were a thing in the early 2000's. It was, for its time, done about right. But its time was 20 years ago.  I did try and update it a while back but it was cruelled by a (recommended) muppet of a tuna who couldnt tell his MAP from his TPS. The original spec was: Power FC, 700cc Sards, Nismo pump, 2860-5's, cams (Basically Poncam A's), Z32 AFM's and a half sorted oiling system. Thereabouts 430rwhp irrespective of what was done. So, yeah, very 1990's. I eventually got sick of it not being very refined and bought a Link G4 PNP with some 1000cc Bosch injectors. This was tuned badly and I put the car in the shed for a few years whilst I sulked and went and did other things. Ive come around to the idea of getting it going again so it has a new gearbox installed and some other minor things in the planning. So my questions are, variously (In the context of keeping the Link) What other sensors should I be running eg It has no wideband on it at the moment, nor fuel pressure. $? Is it worth chucking the old ignition system (ignitors etc) for new ignition coils? $2k? Cam/crank angle sensors? Can keep the aircon? $? Anything else? Sorry to launch another what should I do with my car thread but, you know, what should I do with my car? Random photo for historical context.
    • If you think that's harsh, go experience a KAAZ 🥲 Thoughts and prayers for Dose. I had mine modified by a diff shop to make it less brutal, no idea what they did but it's not as brutal as before. The Asian in me was being tight before and went KAAZ instead of a Nismo, lesson learned.
    • From what I understand, the normal Nismo diff is a bit harsh, and the Pro is the one that behaves more nicely, and you only pay Nismo tax twice to get it.
×
×
  • Create New...