Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G'day just in need of some advice, currently having my rb25det rebuilt,

Mods relevant to the issue are

Cp Pistons Sc7305 86.5mm 9.0:1

Bridgeway forged rods

Block was decked

Been told Comp ratio is only 8.4:1 and pistons are .029" out of the block deck.

Any help appreciated. Cheers guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/454457-rb25det-rebuild-issue-help/
Share on other sites

Doesn't seem possible. Are you sure that they are normal RB25DET pistons, or is it possible that they are for a Neo?

If they are the correct pistons, what is the value of the volume of the "dome" portion of the piston? We can neglect the slight poke of the piston out of the block and use the normal 25 chamber volume and the dome volume to calculate what the CR theoretically is.

  • Like 1

Just doing a real quick and dirty calc, ignoring deck height issues and the gasket thickness, the 63cc chamber, 416.3 cc swept volume and 8cc domes gives 8.56:1 ratio. So close enough to the 8.4 reported before.

FWIW, doing the above with Neo 51.5cc chamber gives 10.5:1.

Ergo, it is hard to believe that these are 9:1 pistons under any circumstances.

Yes

Just doing a real quick and dirty calc, ignoring deck height issues and the gasket thickness, the 63cc chamber, 416.3 cc swept volume and 8cc domes gives 8.56:1 ratio. So close enough to the 8.4 reported before.

FWIW, doing the above with Neo 51.5cc chamber gives 10.5:1.

Ergo, it is hard to believe that these are 9:1 pistons under any circumstances.

It's wierd

Just doing a real quick and dirty calc, ignoring deck height issues and the gasket thickness, the 63cc chamber, 416.3 cc swept volume and 8cc domes gives 8.56:1 ratio. So close enough to the 8.4 reported before.

FWIW, doing the above with Neo 51.5cc chamber gives 10.5:1.

Ergo, it is hard to believe that these are 9:1 pistons under any circumstances.

Yep, just got 8.48:1 using a 1.0mm thick gasket

Good on you or your builder for actually checking.

I'm betting heaps get slapped together with no idea of the compression ratio.

Very true, I had CP pistons put in my RB25DET and I don't believe the CR was checked.

as unfortunate as it is for you. its good info for anyone wanting to buy CP slugs in the future.

Zebra could you calc using 17cc instead of the original 8cc stated?

The stroke measurements were incorrect in a book he was using or something along those lines? It has now come up with 10.5 compression ratio with taking into account the .029" out of the block.( which is probably from being decked too much)

Head cc is 62.8cc

Edited by Muskett

9.9ish:1 using a 1.0mm gasket and 0.8mm out the bore

edit, given that the piston is 0.74mm out of the bore, it works out at 9.84:1 with a 1.0mm gasket

1.3mm gasket is 9.53:1

He came up with 10.5:1 with the standard nissan gasket and the 0.74mm out of the block ( obviously can't use this combination but for calcs)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
    • Yeah since those first 2 replies I actually went and put some 98 in it and tbf it's already doing much better than the 95 (which is weird and makes my inner tinfoil hat wearer think the 95 was a crap batch), getting 8ish around town. Again, wonder if it takes a while to stabilize if the fuel is changed a couple of times. I swear cars used to just either run "well" or "s**t* in my 20s, none of this fuel optimisation business haha 
×
×
  • Create New...