Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all just seeing what people's thoughts are and what may be the cause....

I got a rb25 neo with a gt3076r.82 and I'm not getting full boost until 5500rpm...feels way too laggy for me and from my research and what other people have said it shouldn't be so laggy either. I've just brought a .63 rear housing to get better response (not fitted yet) but I feel like it shouldn't be so laggy anyway and maybe there's an underlying issue?? Setups currently making 340kw @17psi.

Some of the Mods are:

New neo engine

Plazmaman plenum

1000cc injectors

Rb26 covers -12 breathers

52mm rad

600x300x100 fmic

One piece cooler pipping

Fpr

6boost top mount

Gt3076.82

Haltech platinum pro

Edited by lusunt
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/454627-rb25-neo-gt3076-issue/
Share on other sites

  On 10/03/2015 at 10:27 AM, Kinkstaah said:

It matters, a lot. Not as much as you'd get this result though, there's more than just that at play..

I also vote there's some massive boost leak somewhere too, for bonus points

Is there something I can buy that reliably tests for boost/vacuum leaks?

Getting VCT working should be a priority, unless you don't have stock cams?
I believe it will give you about 200rpm more response compared to off.
I would be PM Stao from hypergear and see if he will give you some tips.

The .62 housing will prob get you about another 500 rpm response.
Is it running internal gate?
Try pre loading the actuator

Edit,

Oh yeh, a china spec 3076 will do this :P

Edit again

340 kw with a gt3076 and only 17 psi? That doesnt seem right?
are you on E85?

Edited by jay-rod
  On 10/03/2015 at 11:34 AM, jay-rod said:

Getting VCT working should be a priority, unless you don't have stock cams?

I believe it will give you about 200rpm more response compared to off.

I would be PM Stao from hypergear and see if he will give you some tips.

The .62 housing will prob get you about another 500 rpm response.

Is it running internal gate?

Try pre loading the actuator

Edit,

Oh yeh, a china spec 3076 will do this :P

Edit again

340 kw with a gt3076 and only 17 psi? That doesnt seem right?

are you on E85?

Well my thoughts were that it should hit full boost at around 4000rpm 4400 at latest

if vct only effects it by a couple hundred rpm then I'm not fussed about using it...

Sorry it's

45mil turbosmart External gate

Genuine gt3076

and yeh e85

Edited by lusunt

Then dont use it, but if you have a neo engine with neo cams, why the hell wouldnt you?
No negatives, only positives???

But yes every 3076 i see has full boost by ~4300 on a rb25

Gate could be causing slow boost, do you have a dyno graph with correct scaling?
Would help out most people here diagnoses issues

Edited by jay-rod

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Mate you saved be from dying in the Perth summer. AC wasn't changing direction and just going into diagnostics mode fixed it. You're a legend and I would shout you a beer if I could!
    • Unfortunately effort gone to waste, you will have substantial issues with how the manifold and wastegate have been integrated. You would be so much better off with a modified stock manifold like this: https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25detexgatedmanifold/   OR literally just getting a off the shelf Sinco or 6Boost manifold as myself and others have mentioned.  
    • Yuck. But it's kinda the same principle, moving timing around to make car run bad but sound good.... I went for a more spirited tuning drive to iron out a few things. Car no longer stalls, and it loved to dip RPM low when you clutch in. After tuning this (and the 4-5 tables that HPTuners/LS1 OEM ECU wants for idle air correction) it's now behaving somewhat normal. All expected because there's a new TB, new Intake manifold and that new TB which is 102mm vs 78... has an entirely different IAC passage which is smaller because ????? Unfortunately at this point I went to make further fine tuning changes to avoid it flaring up, you know... _tuning_ the HPTuners dongle died. Well to be more accurate - The USB cable died in a fashion that anyone who has ever charged a phone will recognize. After the app demanding I resync it 50 or so times (which all 'succeeded' but all failed) the device does not want to sync and I've logged a ticket with support to see if it's fixable. US Support said it was a 'storage issue' but after removing the SD card inside it and formatting it/fixing it the issue does persist. Unfortunately usually the fix is "Turn in your old dongle and pay $700 for the upgraded one" it's cheaper because I get some free licence credits I unfortunately don't need. However I'm 10 minutes down the road from HP Tuners AUS/VCM so at least I won't need to post it, and logged a new ticket for support over here. Definitely drives different. My SOTP dyno believes it's probably making 310-320kw instead of the 280 before.  It scrambles for traction a little now whereas it previously different. It drives like a bigger cam car up top even though the cam is smaller, likely due to the cam not being advanced 6 degrees. The timing is deliberately low and the fuel is very rich so who knows if this will improve on the dyno. It may, imperceptably. Also funny is removing the pineapples definitely makes the car squat more and axle tramp less. So this behavior of having more top end, squatting more, and scrabbling for traction more makes me think = more power. But I could have just been sitting on the threshold of that kind of behavior before. Time will tell if my butt dyno is calibrated right. I need the exhaust leaks fixed before dyno tune for obvious AFR related reasons - I repositioned the pipes but I'm not confident it's fully sealed even if it is better. At least the car does drive around while I cannot tweak/tune it for now. And I have aircon again. medium success!
    • Don't use that manifold. Please don't use that manifold. Sunk cost fallacy is not worth the later pain. None of these will be relevant to the change that will come from the different turbo and manifold. As in, the effect of the exhaust will be nil, regardless of what else is changed. And all the cam and fuel system stuff is not changing either way, so has no effect. The turbo and manifold (and to a small extent the wastegate)....big change.
×
×
  • Create New...