Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am putting my engine together this weekend and just discovered a clearance issue with the oil squirters and the bottom of the pistons.

The crank is BC 79mm stroker (2.75L on std bores) and I have a brand new N1 block. The pistons are CP that came with the stroker kit and as you can see from pictures the bottoms of the pistons do not look relieved in the correct location nor are they deep enough for the stroke of the crank. The piston hangs up with approx 15 deg of rotation until BDC each way.

Deck extension at TDC look like they are def stroker pistons so the wrist pin location is correct, just not relieved on the bottom.

Has anyone seen this with this setup? Perhaps they just cut the bottom for the wrong stroke? They also look like they mossed the location relative to the piston by about 10-20 deg.

I have a call in to CP Carillo but I was curious if any builders have seen this?

post-136202-0-00060800-1426434741_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-86102600-1426434767_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-15949000-1426434788_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-54147100-1426434796_thumb.jpg

Well I decided to relieve the pistons. I can't wait another 2 months on this project. Took some measurements and cut the Pistons. I got my scale out and sanded them until they all weighed the same too. Very very little change to overall weight and I would say it's negligible. bottom end is together.

post-136202-0-52803700-1426474381_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-27293700-1426474401_thumb.jpg

Still looks a bit shallow to the eye but it cannot be judged from a picture.

Did you take a measurement of the gap to the squiters?

How much room did you allow? More than 1.5mm-2mm?

I used a bit of modeling clay on the skirt of the piston and ran them down. Yes I have about 1mm clearance. I wanted to be able to lose a rod bearing and not break a squirter off.

Thanks for the replies. I was worried that I was the only one and maybe they sent the wrong pistons.

Patrick

modeling clay showed me where to cut. Then I made several cuts on the first one and kept checking. Once I got that one done, I measured from top of piston with calipers and cut the rest. It was directly inline with one of the oiling holes for the rings, so alignment was easy. I still think I barely missed the angle, but they all have adequate clearance.

Plus the rods grow when they get hot, and yes the piston grows down on the skirt, but only from the wrist-pin down. I can run calcs, but I'm betting nothing will touch.

Patrick.

Edited by HarrisRacing

Oh and they are cut at an angle about 20 deg from horizontal plunging in from the outside to the inside. This is why they look shallow. They follow the angle of the squirters.

I have the same kit in my RB25Neo.

Can confirm you need to do something about the squirters. I'm no engine builder but I believe they came to the same conclusion you did, and modded the pistons with a relief.

The previous engine builder opted to just remove the squirters.

:/

40 thou may not be enough.

Firstly when checking with modeling clay, remember your pushing the piston over (rocking it over) with the clay, where as you really should be rocking it the other way into the squirter for the true minimum possible.

Then allow for bore and piston wear which will let it rock over further.

Id be aiming for a minimum of 80 thou (2mm) +.

You also have the option of putting washers under the squirters should you need a little more if its already assembled.......not too much as remember they are positioned by the pin holes.

Just remember more clearance is better than less.

From memory stock pistons have quite a large cutout to clear the squirters so dont be scared to take out more than you need.

I have the same kit in my RB25Neo.

Can confirm you need to do something about the squirters. I'm no engine builder but I believe they came to the same conclusion you did, and modded the pistons with a relief.

The previous engine builder opted to just remove the squirters.

:/

That's because you don't need them with Forged Pistons like you do with Cast.

That's because you don't need them with Forged Pistons like you do with Cast.

That is what the first builders said

wat

This is what the second builders said

Well you got me paranoid so I added some copper crush washers under the squirters today. Just that extra bit of insurance.

Note for future builders , clearance more than my pictures just in case

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...

FYI you shouldn't have to worry about this any longer. I called CP and they are opening discussions with BC about these pistons. Said they totally see the crash after comparing them with other RB26dett custom pistons and considering stroke looks like it was overlooked somewhere somehow.

You're welcome whoever you are...

And for the record. The BC stroker 8.5:1 CR pistons with valve reliefs are 15.77cc of added dome...Need to take that into account if cutting head, running thin head gasket, etc. I think it's about 8.62:1 if running stock bores on a 1mm thick head gasket, and stock 70cc's in the head.

Patrick

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just don't use ChatGPT or any other artificial stupidity for the equivalent of googling. Their demonstrated inability to discriminate reality from hallucination should be enough to make them totally untrusted. LLMs don't know anything and cannot think to even the smallest extent. They are just predictors of the next word, and that should never be confused with capability.
    • I think, given the usage model described in the OP, I'd never ever experience the wonders of the 400kW upgrade. What I really need is boost from 2000rpm and probably no more than 260-270rwkW. But I suspect that the highflow is not actually the turbo for that purpose, so I may in fact need to get a G25 or 30 or something right sized and very spooly. We shall see after it is tuned. I've had to back the boost and boost ramp off to stop the thing from pinging since the highflow went on, so I've been almost living the NA life for 9 months now! Injectors are recently in hand. AFM is in hand. Dyno is fixed. Just need to clear a queue of f**king Supras out of the way (and probably fit my new gearbox). So....some time this year? Lol.
    • For what I gather is a Sunday/summer car....braided is fine. You're not going to be left without a vehicle and you have plenty of time for inspection/maintenance. Oof. I wouldn't use them that way. They can probably handle the temperature** but the internal corrugations means that their flow characteristics are a bit shit. Lots of extra friction and pressure loss. Makes them flow like the next pipe size down. ** They are stainless, and the stainless can usually be at least something like 304L, which is pretty good at higher temperatures (unlike 316L, which I would use for a wrt/corrosive environment, but not a particularly hot environment). But the welding needs to be top notch. And even then, because you usually need at least one cone-seat end on them (because you can twist the hose and do up both ends at the same time unless one of them is a union) they can be prone to coming loose with heat cycles.
    • I don't have the OEM oil feed lines though and the turbo-wraparound line is torn, only has water. My plan is to get replacements for these and just connect a braided line to there. And make sure it's leak free. Hoses like these are also sometimes used to connect external wastegates, so for an EGR I think you're good using them.
    • Alright I understand. The most likely case is probably gonna be that I just keep the OEM unit in the car as long as it works.
×
×
  • Create New...