Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Times from last year. http://blog.nulon.com.au/2014/04/nulon-nationals-results-round-1-2014/

From memory, the SAU team only got a dry run on the first pass. All passes after that were wet.

Nick Adams ran with the Nulon team and thus had a couple of dry passes. I recon his time is the one to match or beat: 41.24.

Duncan ran in Neils "stock" R33 (Cheryl) for a 46.75. I'd expect him to be a bit faster in the Stag tow vehicle :P

The track record is 31 seconds

Times from last year. http://blog.nulon.com.au/2014/04/nulon-nationals-results-round-1-2014/

From memory, the SAU team only got a dry run on the first pass. All passes after that were wet.

Nick Adams ran with the Nulon team and thus had a couple of dry passes. I recon his time is the one to match or beat: 41.24.

Duncan ran in Neils "stock" R33 (Cheryl) for a 46.75. I'd expect him to be a bit faster in the Stag tow vehicle :P

The track record is 31 seconds

The fastest run for our team was the sighting lap... Our first cruise up the hill just to see where the road went! Pretty sad :P

so were all aiming for 39's

can someone link some incar vids so i can learn the track on friday night

i would not want to do a dave and hit the first barrier i see ( how embarassing)

You are aiming for 29's!!

https://youtu.be/PeVHmEiPqM0

Before that last sweeper there is now another chicane... If there is any footage from Nulon you will see it!

just watched a few evos run up teh hill

thank f**k i dont have one.. boring as shit those things

Correct! Just make sure you beat them!

we have this in the bag

i am going after dave

he clears out the barriers and i straight line it to take the win

strategy ftw

Team SAU!! :banana:

  • Like 1

Bit of a disappointing day for me and hard for the SAU team all round.

Duncan's Stag wasn't finished so had to double enter with Pete.

Pete welded the clutch with a hard launch and was out most of the day. With a bit of team work they got it going again.

My woes were ignition cut out hard around 5.5k rpms. Did two passes and checking all wiring with no luck so I packed it up and came home.

Examining the ECU logs on the computer I noticed boost spike to 1.7/1.8 bar with the boost controller off. Turns out to have been a split line. Duh! Can't believe I was that stupid.

So I will get up early for another drive back up north for day 2. Let's hope I can lay down a good time.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...