Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That's why I plan on getting it tuned with the rb25 turbo I have on there at the moment, if it's fun at that stage of power I'll probably stick with it for quite a while before going for a turbo upgrade

I found in the US DSM and EVO take off 16G turbos for like $200 you can get a housing from kinugawa for them for like $250. Talking USD here but if you bought a RB25 already you might as well just rebuild that. You probably could get EVO 3 and lower or VR4 16G turbos in Australia for a good price I would bet.

2530 @ 1.1kpa *1000

Z32 AFM

some sort of performance exhaust system (duh)

ARC 105mm SMIC

101.5 RON fuel (about the same as ultra-premium in JP)

= 220kw at wheels with stock injectors @ 99% duty cycle (which is not good, but you get the point).

Replace the injectors and you might pick up another 5~10kw, but you literally NEED to replace the injectors since you don't want to run at 99%.

This is the exact setup me and my friend are using. If you don't have access to fuel above 98 RON, you need a front mount pronto.

And Poncams do make a slight difference in torque. The gears make a difference in response. Here is a video proving such:

See the graph at the end. The torque increase = due to cams, the turbo coming on earlier is due to him having also used adjustable gears. Both together = good improvement. Worth $700? Up to you. I used the Tomei Poncams and Tomei adjustable gears.

For example, if I changed to a RB25 and 2535 or GT-RS, and changed nothing else in the setup, I would make the exact same power level but it would be earlier. The advantage to the RB25 though is if I switched to a front mount it would have a lot more potential. No matter what, the RB20 is going to max out at around 400bhp, whereas the RB25 is capable of 400~500.

That's what I found with my car, ymmv.

Edited by Matvei27
  • Like 1

i already have a front mount and run 98, does running the cams and cam gears together make the turbo come on sooner or is it just the cam gears? i dont plan on getting cams but if cam gears themselves can help response a little that would be good as they're relatively cheap

So what cam gears did you have before the Tomei cams went in?

I bought Tomei Poncams and Tomei cam gears at the same time. Before that was 100% stock. If you run the Poncams without the adjustable gears you will not be able to adjust your tune for more low down power, which is what you want on the RB20DET. Definitely don't get them without the gears. The notion that "they're maximized by Tomei at the factory to run without gears" blah blah blah is bullshit, yes they are designed so you can use them without gears if need-be, but even Tomei admits that using them with gears is better on their rather lengthy technical discussion on the Japanese site. Because it lets you have more control over your results, whereas using them without gears gives you absolutely no control over where they make that power. On a RB20DET you want to adjust the gears for down-low, on a RB25DET you would probably want to adjust them for up high since the RB25DET sacrifices some of the top end.

i already have a front mount and run 98, does running the cams and cam gears together make the turbo come on sooner or is it just the cam gears? i dont plan on getting cams but if cam gears themselves can help response a little that would be good as they're relatively cheap

Here's how it will work:

1. Cam gears alone > improved response (turbo spool earlier)

2. Cams alone > improved torque, especially in the midrange, but doesn't help low-end at all and doesn't increase turbo response.

3. Cams + gears > improved torque + improved response

If you just want to improve response get the gears, but I think the Poncams are worth it for the huge midrange torque improvement they provide. See the graph at the end of the video above.

I wouldn't just get Poncams without the gears, however, since you'll damage your low end response. If you use both together you can get an improvement across the rev range without sacrificing much of anything (except your wallet).

The cams are around $500 US, the gears are $200 US. Aside from getting a better turbo, it is the best $700 you can spend on a RB20DET because for most people it will fix the things they hate about it. It's not an extra 500cc, but it's something.

Just don't get anything bigger than the poncams on a RB20DET, it will suck. The procams are really meant for the RB22 and especially the RB24DET, but Tomei doesn't offer the kits to make those anymore. On the RB25DET, I would still say you should use poncams unless you are doing the Tomei RB28DET kit, in which case use the procams.

That's something I am considering for when the RB20 blows, but mine only has 66,000km on it so that won't be for awhile.

Edited by Matvei27

Tah...my trials showed std cams with cam gears gave me better power everywhere vs cams, inc torque. Playing with the tune/timing etc with cams just got me back to the same place.

But i run a very diffrrent turbo setup and the cams were with both a plazmaman plenum and before the plenum so engines would be working very differently.

My mate swore the drop in cams helped his HKS 2530 setup as well so....many ways to skin a cat

Tah...my trials showed std cams with cam gears gave me better power everywhere vs cams, inc torque. Playing with the tune/timing etc with cams just got me back to the same place.

But i run a very diffrrent turbo setup and the cams were with both a plazmaman plenum and before the plenum so engines would be working very differently.

My mate swore the drop in cams helped his HKS 2530 setup as well so....many ways to skin a cat

Did you use the Poncams or the Procams? The Procams won't help at all. If you were using them you were using the wrong cams.

Edited by Matvei27

i dont really have a set budget although the less i spend the better, in terms of engine work i dont plan on doing anymore after the current things im doing to it, so injectors, afm, nistune, possibly cam gears and turbo

Did you use the Poncams or the Procams? The Procams won't help at all. If you were using them you were using the wrong cams.

Ok,Full Trust TD06-20G setup with std inlet plenum and cams optimised with cam gears all tuned up. I then tried Apexi 260/8.8mm cams and went backwards. Tried different cam gear settings and engine lost response and didnt made the same peak power , never actually catching the std cams. Engine sounded tough but was seemingly over cammed.

gallery_462_50_59282.jpg

So std cams went back in.

After everyone saying how good 6boost manifolds are I sold my Trust manifold and gate and went Turbosmart gate and 6boost

gallery_462_50_656235.jpg

So that was a disaster...spend money to lose power. At this point i tried 256/8.5m Poncams and did stuff all to help response but did make a bit more power. At this point I was desperate for response so in went std cams again which made the thing a little plunchier

So reading about Plazmaman plenums...I thought I would give one of them a try....hopefully grab some improved response

gallery_462_50_44142.jpg

LOL...nope. So going to 6boost and Plazman was a step back ON MY SETUP. Perhaps because my tune and setup was pretty well optimised and proven with a few years of track work before I started trying different things.

For me, if I had stuck with std inlet plenum and Trust manifold and gate my car would have been a good bit quicker than with the bling bolted on.

I lost a headgasket when a hose under the inlet went in traffic so I put in an NA R32 RB25DE that had rebuilt internals. All the bits from my RB20 were swapped over and after a bit of trialling my TD06-20G with an 8cm and 12cm housing and with / without the Poncams put back in...the Poncams in my RB25DE certainly helped the power curve , though didnt really change when it came on

gallery_462_50_22041.jpgEv

Even then we found a problem with the Turbosmart gate so its possible it was leaking on the std cam pull making the setup a bit lazier. With the gate fixed it held boost and made way better top end, around what the RB20 was making. The above plot wasnt full tunes. I just wanted to see the general behavior of the setup of different turbo, housings, cams etc to decide which direction i wanted to take. Ended up going T67 and frankly 12 months later I am going back to my custom billet turbo

SO, after 16 years of playing with my car, 15 of it with an internally std RB20.....from a value perspective the std inlet and cams give the IMO the BEST bang for buck

If you want to run Poncams then there are those that have had good results...but inc tuning, labour and cams its what...at least a $1500 mod and I guess thats up to the individual to say whether that investment is worth the improvement (keeping in mind that some people go backwards)

over 270kw out of an rb20 :O

Feed the things E85

E85, std inlet manifold, a better turbo ...something like a FP HTA 71 or HTA 68 turbo and it would be pretty easy to blow my results away....lol the sh1t you learn getting it wrong :)

Yeah, not to belittle Roy's result, but ~270rwkW was not an uncommmon power level for TD06s on std manifold in Japan back at the turn of the century. The JMS car (here in Aust) was in that territory even before I bought my RB20 car, and that was last century. You'd expect things to have only gotten better with better specced turbos, management, ignition, etc etc.

LOl, the problem with RB20s are just like the JMS car they put the wrong turbo on things and when the result is a compromise they blame the RB20. LOL putting a gate on the std manifold, using a 20G off a rotary with a waay too big A/R turbine housing will certainly make good power and turn tyres...but it was alwaas going to be a compromise. Must be RB20s :(

But that drift Onevia was just a bit of fun....and they knew it was less than optimal

There is nothing special about my setup at all. Those that have done similar / copied have all got the same or better! Just dont put a turbo built for another engine on an RB20 or run a MINES ECU etc etc.

fair enough, while looking at some different turbos i came across this http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-Bolt-On-3-Anti-Surge-RB20DET-RB25DET-TD06H-60-1-T3-8cm-/271795646032?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_15&hash=item3f48486e50 would something like this have good response? much cheaper than garrett or hypergear options which would cover the cost for some cam gears

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
×
×
  • Create New...