Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so at this stage im going to go for a td05 16g with a std 2.4" or 3" compressor cover, compared to the garrett 2860 this should provide similar response and power except $400 cheaper, or will it be not as god as the garret turbo?

I think it largely depends on how good those Kando Rb T3 housings work. The TD05-16G you describe is effectively a Trust T517z. The Garrett is effectively a HKS 2530. So if you spend a few hours reading SR20DET results using a T517z vs HKS 2530 you will get an idea what you are getting yourself into :)

EVERYTHING is a compromise! You need to decide for yourself what compromises you will live with based on what your desired objectives are.

i think i may end up going with the garrett after all, it is slightly larger overall but its ball bearing vs the kinugawa's journal bearing so i'll be getting a similar response overall with more power, i guess thats why its an extra $400 haha, and if the garrett really is essentially a hks 2530 then on every single thread ive read the hks turbo is the best thing for an rb20 so i might just go with that

ive heard plenty of stories with second hand turbos that have put me off them haha, or just but the garrett for $1400?

That's for you to decide isn't it....

Heaps of people have no worries with second hand turbos. Obviously there is a risk though.

unless hks decide to suddenly have a 50% off sale then at this stage garrett it is, i dont have a problem with second hand parts as long as they arent something major, but with a turbo i just dont want to run the risk since it can have large consequences so i'll be going with a new one

the garrett is the exact same as the hks, roy posted a graph with several different turbos on rb20's and the garret and hks had almost identical spool rates and peak boost levels, and its 1400 as opposed to the more expensive hks, i'd prefer not to get a used turbo as there is always the risk of it being shit

I don't think they're exactly the same...should be pretty close but the HKS might be tweaked a bit.

The more important aspect is that the HKS comes as a kit with everything you need should you buy it new, hence why it is a good value and worth the money.

I don't know anyone who has bought a HKS 2530 who has said "gee I wish I bought a cheaper turbo!" or anything like that.

  • Like 1

they are almost identical in terms of basically everything, i have not found a hks turbo with the kit for any less than $2200 so i dont know where you got your $1800 figure from, and i've just found the garrett can come with a kit for an extra $200, making it still $200 cheaper than your $1800 value anyway, and you're talking like anything but a hks turbo is garbage, last time i checked garrett is one of the best brands out there, but then again you're a guy willing to spend $250 on a second hand hks dump pipe so by the looks of things you're a hks fanboy who thinks everything else is crap so your advice seems pretty pointless and useless honestly

HKS IS Garrett. Just with some unique-to-HKS (but still made by Garrett) housings and wheels. The quality is exactly the same.

Back when the 2530 came out, Garrett were not allowed to put out a turbo using the same stuff as the HKS turbos had. But that agreement would have expired years ago, hence Garrett have been able to put out things which are not much different from the old HKS products.

HKS IS Garrett. Just with some unique-to-HKS (but still made by Garrett) housings and wheels. The quality is exactly the same.

Back when the 2530 came out, Garrett were not allowed to put out a turbo using the same stuff as the HKS turbos had. But that agreement would have expired years ago, hence Garrett have been able to put out things which are not much different from the old HKS products.

There are multiple versions of the 2530, the 2530kai (the current iteration) is a pretty recent product.

they are almost identical in terms of basically everything, i have not found a hks turbo with the kit for any less than $2200 so i dont know where you got your $1800 figure from, and i've just found the garrett can come with a kit for an extra $200, making it still $200 cheaper than your $1800 value anyway, and you're talking like anything but a hks turbo is garbage, last time i checked garrett is one of the best brands out there, but then again you're a guy willing to spend $250 on a second hand hks dump pipe so by the looks of things you're a hks fanboy who thinks everything else is crap so your advice seems pretty pointless and useless honestly

Garrett makes HKS turbos. But the HKS turbos are not exactly the same ones that Garrett sells themselves.

The HKS 2530kai is specifically designed for the RB20 and RB25DET. The Garrett ones are universal.

I am willing to spend $250 on a HKS dump because that's what they're worth, but I found one in Japan. I am using it to test the difference in response between the Tomei one and the HKS one.

If you want the best suited turbo for the job you'll buy the HKS one as it is designed for this engine with a smaller housing for better response. If you want to save a few hundred dollars go ahead but don't come here complaining when it doesn't have the same response as your stock RB20DET turbo or RB25DET turbo.

Amazon Japan sells it new as a kit for $1885.64 USD right now. Go get someone to buy it for you.

Edited by Matvei27

$1885 USD = $2462 AUD and this is an australian forum so it would be a good assumption to make that most people here are from australia, on the graphs roy posted the garrett and hks had the basically exact same spool rate, peak boost, with the garrett having more top end power as well, now both cars could have had different modifications but both were rb20's and you generally cant change the spool time of a turbo unless you increase capacity, it simply makes no sense to spend $800 more on a turbo which will spool up at the same time, make the same power and is of the same quality, unless of course you genuinely like throwing away your money pointlessly

Judging by the graph the HKS has slightly more low down power whereas the Garrett has more up top.

Which makes sense as the 2530 was tweaked to improve response on RB engines.

If the difference isn't worth it to you that's one thing but clearly the 2530 is slightly more responsive so at the end of the day it depends if you want low end or top end.

in the graph the hks has more power off boost until about halfway spooled, and between halfway and when the turbo is spooled up they have almost identical power, keeping in mind the garrett turbo is running less boost as seen in the bottom graph, $800 for about 100-200rpm more responsiveness is simply not worth it, especially considering peak power was 10-20kw's more than the hks with less boost

Edited by sama1500

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...