Jump to content
SAU Community

R33 Ecu Identification


Recommended Posts

Hey Guys just wondering if anyone can give me some info on ECUs hope this is the right section

ive recently purchased a 95 33 GTS-t and the guy that i got it from wasnt really sure what the previous owner had done, but he was fairly certain it had a Z32 afm and a highflow turbo
ive done some searching and the orange sticker on the AFM suggests it is a Z32 and the turbo has also been highflowed

today i decided to pull the ECU out and have a look to see what has been done to run the Z32 as it is my understanding that it has to be tuned to run correctly but from what i can find and see the ECU is stock as a rock, number on the front says its from a manual s1.5/2 33 which is correct but im not really sure what im looking for inside

ill add some photos to this post

any help greatly appreciated

post-139550-0-77334400-1427367439_thumb.jpg

post-139550-0-86257200-1427367457_thumb.jpg

post-139550-0-27815000-1427367497_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is possible to burn a tune for an R33 ECU. There's no obvious sign that this has been done on yours though.

It is not possible to run a bigger AFM on a stock ECU unless you get a coincidentally exactly right sized injector upgrade to go along with it, so at least the fuelling will be right and the ECU won't go into panic from too high a calculated TP (which comes from high AFM signal). So worth looking at your injectors too perhaps, to see if they're stock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your R33 ECU has been 'chipped' - you'll notice the chip labelled H8/534 is in a socket while the other is not, a dead giveaway that it's non standard. The factory ecu also has a foil sticker with the MEC code of the program eg MEC-R503A on the CPU - I've got half a dozen R33 ecu's in a pile here including one that has been socketed to compare to.

There is only a few companies that can do it as you need to firstly fit the 54 pin socket and secondly the 'chip' on an R33 is actually the processor - the memory and CPU on an R33 ecu is one and the same. The CPUs aren't cheap to buy (last I checked are no longer available) and you can only burn the program once so you want to make sure you get it right. As far as figuring out what your ecu has been set up for the only way to do it would be to connect it up and download the ROM image through the consult port with NissanDataScan or Nistune (provided the tuner hasn't locked the rom download function) and compare the maps to stock R33.

Edited by XR Pilot
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Seatbelt bolts are 7/16 UNF in most cases
    • Yes, this is why I end up being 'vocal' with executives. "I want it" can't be "Just because we should have it" you need reasons. It has way too big knock on effects to simply want something "Just because" at that level in orgs with 10,000+ employees. Currently, message labelling. Sounds great. Except there is no governance on how to actually HANDLE message labels, so I may as well implement the labels as "Pink Flamingo" or "Conrod" or "Massive Dildo" and force people to choose one for every message, with no framework underpinning any of it. It has no value and can actually have detrimental value if all it does is serve to annoy people into clicking something random, or just using the default for everything, especially if there's no repercussions for getting it wrong, no monitoring for people doing it right, and no guidance on what needs to be what label. "But we need message labels!" f**k sake.
    • It's worse than that. They cannot even picture the full scope of what it is that they are pitching or wanting. They see the core idea and cannot conceive of any of the side effects, compromises, losses of existing functionality that needs to be replaced somehow, etc etc, that come with doing these things. So how can they do a cost/benefit when they don't even know what the full set of changes actually looks like?
    • I mean something people seem to be WOEFUL at is doing a proper cost/benefit analysis. Going cloud is great, if it saves you time and money. Does it? I have found a LOT of managers just want 'the new thing' with SUB-zero understanding of what it is and how it functions and why they need it. I spend a lot of time on that point nowadays too.
    • I'm an engineer. I am not supposed to do IT. I have been doing my company's IT for 25 years, because initially there was no one else capable and since because I don't trust anyone. Back in the day, we used to run a Linux server with just sendmail level mail handling. Everything was POP and SMTP. Then, someone demanded calendaring and the like, so I implemented Scalix (an OS Exchange clone) - from scratch. Migrated all the numpties over, administered that system for years. Then Scalix started to decline. So I spun up a full Zimbra system. Same same as Scalix, but different (ie, not even a fork). Ran that for a while in parallel with Scalix as I tried to migrate old users over. Both of these were on prem, with local backup in the case of Zimbra. (No backup at all on the Scalix server! Gasp!) At some point, I spat the dummy, after years of this, and capitulated and bought O365 for the whole company and migrated everyone off the on prem stuff and shuffled them off to the cloud. It has been easier and shitter ever since, seeing as MS cannot leave anything alone for more than 3 minutes and have to keep changing everything and making it "better' (I read that as "harder"!). It's like their entire crew are ADHD squirrels on meth. Meanwhile, all our data has been kept on prem on file servers with decent backup. Now the higher ups are demanding that we migrate all the data to the cloud. I am shuddering at the idea that it will all be held to ransom on some shit AWS or, even worse, Azure/Sharepoint system where you're at the mercies of the above posted price hikes, commercial disputes, company collapses/takeovers/DOS attacks/etc etc. I hate it. But... if it can get me free of the bloody IT shit so I can finally concentrate on real engineering work for the first time in 25 years, then.... good?
×
×
  • Create New...