Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is this build really built for response, 8.5comp and no VCT sounds more like a big boost top end setup??

How would this build compare to a RB3025 neo with VCT and 9.5comp with even 50% E85 mix... surely that would of got big torque low down...

Yes I was trying to get response and from what I had, it is pretty good. It is very linear as it goes from idle to 6500rpm, well that was the highest I could go on the revs before it played up. But when I first came home I did get the chance to give it a launch from 5000rpm and there was a little 4W spin and no lag, so I guess you can say it has pretty good response.

To get near that before I was going from 7500+ rpm and it would still dig in a bit

Have no idea about your comparisons , I am sure there will be some blokes that could answer your question :)

Is this build really built for response, 8.5comp and no VCT sounds more like a big boost top end setup??

How would this build compare to a RB3025 neo with VCT and 9.5comp with even 50% E85 mix... surely that would of got big torque low down...

Has to run on 98 and you have to stop spending somewhere

Everyone would love V-cam....but cant always afford it

Lol, how exactly does VCT help response over dialed static cams when response is all you are after

Yet still yet to see any proof VCT is better then properly dialled cams

The advantage of VCT is that you can dial in your cams for response at as low a revs as possible and then still get a good push further up when your static cams would lag behind. So VCT does not of itself create better response but it enables you to set up for maximum reponse while getting better power further up than if you did not have VCT.

QED

LOL

ROFL

ETC

The advantage of VCT is that you can dial in your cams for response at as low a revs as possible and then still get a good push further up when your static cams would lag behind. So VCT does not of itself create better response but it enables you to set up for maximum reponse while getting better power further up than if you did not have VCT.

QED

LOL

ROFL

ETC

So what your saying is VCT does not help response against cams dialled in for response :thumbsup:

Proven !!, really, where exactly is the proof, i read alot of people saying it's better but still no ACTUAL proof

So what your saying is VCT does not help response against cams dialled in for response :thumbsup:

Proven !!, really, where exactly is the proof, i read alot of people saying it's better but still no ACTUAL proof

Way to be selective in what you read.....

The whole point of VCT is that you can have the (int eh case of a RB25) intake cam set for max twist down low, then have it change over to carry the torque curve further up the rev range....

But Porsche, Ford, Merc, BMW etc etc must all be wrong......

Way to be selective in what you read.....

The whole point of VCT is that you can have the (int eh case of a RB25) intake cam set for max twist down low, then have it change over to carry the torque curve further up the rev range....

But Porsche, Ford, Merc, BMW etc etc must all be wrong......

Lol, kettle black mate

The point started at someone saying built for response but don't have VCT, i posted how does VCT better static cams dialed for response then Kiwi responded basicly confirming what is said

At no point did any one mention response AND topend :/

As the guys mentioned, i have posted my graph of my stock factory RB26 more then once for people to beat for both bottom end as well as top

And i'm still waiting

We are also only talking RB25 VCT V RB26, or any other cam timing setup that only changes the inlet cam timing from one maximum to the other, though would love to see how a RB with the VE cam setup would go

.....

As the guys mentioned, i have posted my graph of my stock factory RB26 more then once for people to beat for both bottom end as well as top

And i'm still waiting

....

ooooo.....where?

Xkalaba, don't take it as a personal attack you have to defend!

I don't like your chances of getting a guy with stock turbos chucking vct on, so I don't think you will ever get the direct comparison you are after.

What's your idle like with the dialed cams?

Xkalaba, don't take it as a personal attack you have to defend!

I don't like your chances of getting a guy with stock turbos chucking vct on, so I don't think you will ever get the direct comparison you are after.

What's your idle like with the dialed cams?

Spends 8k+ on VCT kit but keeps stock turbos :rolleyes:

Idles like a babies bottom, smooooth as

Not like the 34, lol

Like i said, i'm happy to see a NEO with any turbo you like, so given the NEO has a "better designed combustion chamber" and NEO and the latest tech single turbo you can get it should easy walk over my 80s tech bush bearing factory twins on a static cam setup

I want to see same boost (19psi) run 290+rwkw and beat my 26 for response then prove it on the drag strip cause we all know dynos can be made to lie

I'm starting get personal about it cause every time i come on a performace thread someone throws up should have gone NEO or VCT and saying it with no proof is misinformation

ooooo.....where?

Fark it, cause one more time won't and you asked so nicely :P

post-36620-0-27148400-1429787456_thumb.jpg

This graph was done at a SAU dyno day back in 2007 4 days after the full wieght plus stereo R32 GTR ran back to back 11.3@125mph with a stock motor, the stock turbo world record in the link in my sig

  • Like 1

Fark it, cause one more time won't and you asked so nicely :P

attachicon.gifimage.jpg

This graph was done at a SAU dyno day back in 2007 4 days after the full wieght plus stereo R32 GTR ran back to back 11.3@125mph with a stock motor, the stock turbo world record in the link in my sig

I should have bought your car from the get go, would have saved me a shit load of money and hassle , haha

  • Like 1

I need to learn more, but arnt the RB26 and the neo25 pretty similar heads ( apart from VCT) , if they arnt that much different then the VCT would of been good, in comparing response im thinking about how 34GeeTee's 2.5L graph with the HTA3076 has 280kw's at 4000rpm and that doesn't even have a stroker kit...

Edited by AngryRB

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did you get any down time over Christmas, or have you had any since to play with this? Or have you given up and are trying to get yourself a second hand V8SC instead?
    • A random thought I had just before I hit "Submit on this post". If brake fluid, in a container in my garage that has never been opened goes bad after 18 months, why can I leave it in my car for 24 months in an "unsealed container"... Secondly, some other digging, and brake fluid manufacturers seem to be saying 5 year shelf life... Me thinks there line on 18 months for an unsealed bottle is pretty much horse shit marketing spin. Kind of like how if you drive a car and don't run a turbo timer your turbo and motor will die horribly...   Where I started on this though... Someone (me) started down a bit of a rabbit hole, I don't quite have the proper equipment to do Equilibrium Reflux boiling per the proper test standards. I did a little digging on YouTube, and this was the first video I found on someone attempting to "just boil it". This video isn't overly scientific, as we don't have a known reference for his test either. Inaccuracy in his equipment could have him reaching the 460 to 470f boiling point range in reality. In the video, using a laser temp gun, he claims his Dot3 that's been open in his florida garage for over a year gets to about 420 to 430 fahrenheit (215 to 221c) Doing some googling, I located an MSDS for that specific oil, and from new, it claims a dry boiling point of 460 to 470f. Unfortunately they don't list a wet boiling point for us to see how far it degraded toward its "wet" point. While watching it I was thinking "I wonder what the flash point is..." turns out its only 480f for that specific brake fluid....   As for testing the oil's resistance, I might not be able to accurately do that unfortunately. Resistance level will be quite a LOT higher than my system can read I suspect based on some research. However, I might be able to do it by measuring the current when I apply a specific voltage. I won't have an actual water % value, but I'll have some values I can compare between the multitude of fluids. I'll run some vague calculations later and see if I should be able to read any reliable amount of current. These calcs will be based on some values I've found for other oils, and see how close I'll need my terminals together. From memory I can get down to 1pA accuracy on the DMM. I don't think my IOT Power Tester has any better resolution.    
    • No, with a twin plate clutch flywheels and clutch pressure plate/friction disks go together. Only clutch where that isn't the case is the Uniclutch but they currently don't make a pull version for the Getrag R34, just some other cars. Personally the flywheel is as light as I'd want it to be. It already drops revs faster than I want to shift normally and I blip the throttle again to rev match on upshifts.
    • Are there any other lighter flywheels that can be used with nismo coppermix twinplate system? Id like to gave the revs pick up faster than oem
    • RB20/25 covers don’t have threaded fasteners stock like RB26 covers. They are blind rivets so I will need to drill out and tap threads. I bought some M4x6mm button heads and will report back once done if I chose correctly length wise.    have also got some loctite 
×
×
  • Create New...