Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

im coming to this forum in need of great assistance lol

ive been reading posts from all over the forums about rb's.

ive tried putting this question on Zilvia.net but no one could help

so here it is.

i have a 96 s14 with an Rb25det Series 1.

im using wiring specialties harness .

Freddy intake

FMIC

MBC.

Rb20 FLASHED ECU

now for some odd reason my car has poor performance at 15 degrees timing

it drives fine idles ok and there are no hickups to the powerband other than it being rediculously slow.

now i have fully advanced the timing and it runs OK. i can barely pull from my buddys stock 350z when im running 12psi.

at stock psi its still slow lol

things ive tried:

Checked timing belt at least 5 times to be sure it wasnt a tooth off.

replaced maf cause i had a bad one.

changed plugs gapped down to .26

waiting to try my buddys CAS so see if mine is f'd up

i havent had a chance to see if my ecu is pulling timing when high revving with a timing light

my main concern is why do i have to run fully advanced timing ?

btw at 15* if i try to run 12 psi it detonates like crazy.

there are no ecu codes

no vacuum leaks

no boost leaks.

my buddys stock 1jz s13 is way faster than my rb. wth

any help greaty appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/455439-rb25-s14-advanced-timing/
Share on other sites

I think .26mm plug gap is WAAAAYYYY to small. Your engine should be capable of using near stock gap of 1.1mm. Maybe 1mm should be the least you would need.

Some timing lights give a reading double the actual timing. The safest way to get a proper timing is to use an old spark plug lead inserted between #1 coil and #1 spark plug, then set the timing "old school".

And was the ecu flashed on a dyno, or is it something someone says worked in another car?

I think .26mm plug gap is WAAAAYYYY to small. Your engine should be capable of using near stock gap of 1.1mm. Maybe 1mm should be the least you would need.

Some timing lights give a reading double the actual timing. The safest way to get a proper timing is to use an old spark plug lead inserted between #1 coil and #1 spark plug, then set the timing "old school".

And was the ecu flashed on a dyno, or is it something someone says worked in another car?

These were pretty much my thoughts

You dont have the locator broken off the cam and have the CAS a tooth out?

The ECU was flashed to run 12psi? If it were me id get a 25 ECU and see if that improves things. Sounds like it would run better with a stock ECU anyway. Turn boost down to around 7psi

Edited by 89CAL

I've tried running with the stock ecu and it

Idles horribly rough to where it stalls.

But driving it on stock boost it feels Ok.

Yes that is how I checked timing.

I inserted a plug wire into coil #1 and set at 15* after disconnecting the tps

As far as the vvt I haven't checked anything for that yet.

This ecu is just flashed to run stock rb25 but I'm using a boost controller to creep the boost to 12 psi.

Yes I'm waiting to try another cas maybe tomorrow cause my buddy has an s2 rb25.

The harness continuity should be good since I'm using wiring specialties harness, but nevertheless thats not to say it can't be f*d up haha

Another thing I'm going to try is the knock sensors, maybe its sending a false signal to the ecu.

Compression ratios are

130

130

130

135

129

130

I don't remember if that was warmed up or not lol

What's happening with the VVT and the 20 ecu?

This! Latest Nistune stuff will allow RB20 ECU to run VCT, but as far as I know it is not possible to make it happen without Nistune. Ergo this RB25 is running without VCT. And that means that the fuel and timing maps both are not optimised in the half of the map where VCT is not working properly. Therefore it is not running "stock" maps in quite the way that it would run them if VCT was working. This might not explain all of this engine's problems, but it would certainly explain why it doesn't drive nice.

Edited by GTSBoy

i have removed the Catalyst and im running a 3" straight pipe from the turbo back

yes it did run a little better then the rb20 ecu, sounded quieter and felt like a tab bit

more power.

then with the stock ecu i moved the timing to 15* and it ran super slow as hell and idles like shit.

my check engine light was even blinking lol i didnt even know it works lol

so only fully advanced does the car feel ok.

im going to try a CAS tomorrow

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
    • Thanks Paul I reached out to Autotainment but they no longer work on JDM cars as the guy who used to do the work moved on and is no longer doing that kind of work. I am talking with Level Up Audio though.
×
×
  • Create New...