Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I realise that there are very minor if any gains are to be made from installing a cold air or short ram intake but the most noticeable effect would be the induction sound and roar from the engine, which at the moment I do kind of crave.

Looking around on the G37 forums etc, I've seen several people doing something called a Ghetto Air Box Mod (GAB), basically cutting a hole in the stock airbox and with that, much greater induction noise.

Since I might actually purchase an intake (R2C most likely), I will probably try this out and install some K&N Panel Filters along the way, maybe put some mesh over the hole to reduce any solids that may fly through into my air filters. But before I try, has anyone done this modification here?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/455492-stock-air-intake-modifcation/
Share on other sites

Lol, proven 15whp upgrade from an intake on a natro.

Straighter pipe with less in the way will get you the noise. Pay for a brand name kit with massive gains or stick on a peice of ally with couplers on either end and a pod. Performance wise, z-tube and panel filter are the way to go.

Lol, proven 15whp upgrade from an intake on a natro.

Straighter pipe with less in the way will get you the noise. Pay for a brand name kit with massive gains or stick on a peice of ally with couplers on either end and a pod. Performance wise, z-tube and panel filter are the way to go.

"15whp gain proven with a tune"

Sorry obviously you dont read word by word . .

Lol, proven 15whp upgrade from an intake on a natro.

Straighter pipe with less in the way will get you the noise. Pay for a brand name kit with massive gains or stick on a peice of ally with couplers on either end and a pod. Performance wise, z-tube and panel filter are the way to go.

"15whp gain proven with a tune"

Sorry obviously you dont read word by word . .

Tomei also demonstrated a whopping 80whp increase with a tune using their turbos on a SR20. Small print mentioned that it was a stroked motor with other bits and peices.

I can prove that my stock V35 produces 260rwkw. A mates stock Rodeo produced 365rwkw on the dyno. So many factors go into a tune and to say that an intake on a natro boosts power by 15rwhp or ~10% is not only misleading, it's absurd. Any of the guys who've built/worked on/ played with these motors would be able to tell you that. Guys like Scotty in Vic, Matt up in QLD etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all. So I have my GTR on the lift and have been working on it a few days and today I unpacked the frontpipe that was wrapped with heat wrap stuff, because part of it was breaking down and soaked in oil. Noticed that the pipe itself does not actually look like a Mines, despite it supposedly being a Mines. But I could not find any fronpipe online that looks exacly like his, and I don't think it is a custom one. My amateur measurement also showed the two pipes are about equal length, so maybe this is just an old version of the Mines pipe? Would appreciate insight on this by the enlightened folks. greetings from Germany
    • Yeah. If I plug the connector in and connect the vacuum lines, I assume worse case scenario is that it simply doesn't work? Yep PFC.
    • I would think that rather than attempting to perform an engine swap, with all the difficulties associated with doing so in a country where the raw materials required are harder to get hold of, I would just build the CA20 for boost, find an EFI manifold for it and either add a turbo or a supercharger. Or both. You replace one set of difficulties with a different set, but I know which would be more fun.
    • Well, a proper aftermarket ECU** SHOULD be set up to run the purge solenoid, same as the factory ECU would, so that the tank breather system continues to operate the way it is supposed to. I have no knowledge of whether the PFC (which is what I assume you mean when you say Apexi) has an output (and internal logic) to run the purge solenoid. If it does not, then given the product design intent for the PFC, which is to be a plug in replacement for the stock ECU, I would consider that a massive failing on Apexi's behalf and would be another reason to think that they were a half-arsed solution to the problem if programmable management on RBs. I would suggest that since Nistune came to market (which is a LOOOOONG time ago now) there has been no valid argument for choosing a PFC, especially if the PFC can't do things like this.   **ie, Haltach, Link, Motec, etc
    • Thanks for asking the question we were all thinking!
×
×
  • Create New...