Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Interesting story . My take .

I don't think any RB25 was designed at Nissan to be a real power house in that engine family . They certainly didn't use it to go racing with .

A lot of things could be affecting your power and boosting characteristics and one I reckon could be the 25s inlet manifold design . What Nissan wanted was reasonable power output but more importantly good part throttle torque because that's what 90% of a road engines life is spent at . Its basically a hole on one side and six on the other so when you try to feed really high airflows through it isn't ideal . Nissan wouldn't have gone to the trouble they did with the 26s manifold if the far simpler 25s effort worked well enough .

1 hole, into 8 holes

3000hp

IMG_0225.jpg

  • Like 1

1 hole in the middle feeding 6 holes is more balanced than 1 big hole on 1 end feeding 6.

Turbo F1 era ran 1 hole in the middle feeding 4 with a log design intake manifold.

That was more a case of even air disributon and tuning the intake.

ITB were the best way of getting good throttle response.

Edited by GTRPSI

Glad to see it's not just confusing me :P.

Note: Before the engine was rebuilt the same spec turbo did this at 22-25-29 style PSI (per gear).

The guys doing the head stated the previous job was shit and theirs would flow way better.

Picked up a fair whack of response, and well, more powers for way less boost.

It may just be that they're right, and the thing is just too small/can't create resistance to flow in the head.

I imagine if you put a GTX3076 on a LS1, it would not create 30psi no matter what you do with it.

My main worry is what boost I should set the gate to, to avoid overspinning and frying the thing. I guess whatever boost level makes the power the turbo is rated at? (for lack of any other idea)

What does it do on a dyno

What boost does it run to make 380rwkw?

Same as on road, or is it going higher on the road due

To a lot more load?

Be better road tuning it and seeing how fuel it uses to determine

Boost pressure if its different on road.

Cheers

Darren

  • 2 weeks later...

If it's a new garrett turbo I wouldn't imagine excessive shaft speed would be a large concern unless you are trying to run 95 psi through or some spastic number. The gate pressure is the target before it diverts excess pressure, ie "shaft speed control". As long as you have a target on the compressor map it should be within its engineered limits. The most likely failure would be oil contamination or dirt in the intake which gets into the bearings. IMHO these would more likely to kill a new garrett turbocharger.

Not being able to reach consistent boost in all gears sounds like something is mismatched. There's no reason you can only make 20 psi in gear 3 vs gear 4 for example. Think of psi as your turbo shaft speed. If the engine and setup is matched correctly, or not mismatched then your shaft speed should hit its target no problems. Of course if u are outside the engineering limits, ie expecting 80psi then no hope but at normal levels it should be consistent. My evo makes 19psi in every gear, why shouldn't it?

Reading through your posts Kinkstaah, you mention the boost as 17, 20 and 22psi through the first 3 gears, what is it in 4th and 5th? Or did my reading comprehension let me down?

Without getting technical, I assume you're confident that the car isn't just traction limited in the lower gears? That would be the 100% simplest explanation but I didn't see it mentioned in your previous posts. Or slippage somewhere else in the driveline? Even if the mechanical engine load is absolutely identical through the gears (unlikely even with perfect traction, level road etc.), remember that the aerodynamic load will be higher in the higher gears

Depending on what you list the boost as in 4/5th gear, I don't think what your observing wouldn't necessarily be an "issue". For example, nobody has yet touched on the different locations that you are reading the intake pressure from vs where the wastegate pressure is being observed from, and I'd guess one is reading static pressure, the other total pressure (static + velocity pressure). What I'm getting at is its possible that the difference in airflow through the engine (what actually matters) in different gears might be hardly varying, yet producing noticeably different pressure readings.

Edited by YawRate

I agree with boost leak or just something flat wrong with the exhaust manifold or design. What manifold is it?? How is the wastegate plumbed? Any pictures?

But yes boost leak starts to sound like a really good idea. And I agree that turbo is SCREAMING if it is doing what you say with a boost leak. Block off your BOV and go for a ride...could be something wrong with it and you just aren't seeing it because you are looking in the wrong place for the problem (that or the BOV is only leaking at high boost!).

That turbo on a stroker should make pretty much full boost straight off of a decent stall with an auto!

Edited by HarrisRacing

He's making the same power on lower boost, an RB30 with GT3076 makes 300kw's at 14psi?? an RB25 does it at 18psi usually on 98, that seems to be a fact, so seems logical that the RB30 breaths so much that its outflowing and running the GT30 into the limits , it just can't create that pressure when its being flowed out so efficiently???? ( hence shaft speed) its still making the same power though so there cant be much of a leak happening, must be just about maxing out surely...

Edited by AngryRB

When you get boost leaks with modern turbos, power honestly doesnt drop to

Much up top like people here think

so saying something is in ballpark power wise doesnt mean much

What you do lose is area under the curve. And i can tell you not many dyno

Operators pick it up on the dyno. Ive always found playing around on rd picks up that stuff. Dynoes do not load a car up like on road. Even on the harshest ramp rate. Experienced it many times myself..

My last build did same thing and was blowoff valve. Boost went from 21 to 27psi in midrange once fixed. Gate woudnt open in lower gears

power on dyno was within 10rwkw as what youd expect

its harder to pick up with autos due to load applied and the way loads applied...

Cheers

Darren

I pressure tested his intake for him yesterday, nothing leaking much. The gasket between the plenum halves was bubbling away as usual (although it was only a slow leak)

Back to the drawing board, seems it just can't supply enough air to make the target boost as Mark said above, or it's only leaking at WOT which makes it hard to pinpoint.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...