Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just my thoughts after having the car for 3 weeks.

Firstly great looking car nice rims chrome around the windows looks nice. Only fault no driving lights on front bar should be standard on all sp models. Secondly top engine lots of power smooth acceleration. Theres been a few post about fuel economy been not so great iam getting 520klm per tank which is unreal considering the performance you have on tap. Good quality interior nice layout love the music box. The standard audio is actually not the bad good bass from the front speakers.FAULTS to me are the steering seems quit heavy as soon as theres a defect in the road the car will pull to that side in a hurry which can be a pain. Suspension is quit firm can get very bumpy at times nissan should have had a setting for comfort and sport. Saying that it handels great around corners. So all up I realy like the car but its not for me I think it was more of an impulse buy and will be selling it soon. Hope to read some replys on other owners and there thoughts

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456307-pv36-review-after-3-weeks/
Share on other sites

Just my thoughts after having the car for 3 weeks.

Firstly great looking car nice rims chrome around the windows looks nice. Only fault no driving lights on front bar should be standard on all sp models. Secondly top engine lots of power smooth acceleration. Theres been a few post about fuel economy been not so great iam getting 520klm per tank which is unreal considering the performance you have on tap. Good quality interior nice layout love the music box. The standard audio is actually not the bad good bass from the front speakers.FAULTS to me are the steering seems quit heavy as soon as theres a defect in the road the car will pull to that side in a hurry which can be a pain. Suspension is quit firm can get very bumpy at times nissan should have had a setting for comfort and sport. Saying that it handels great around corners. So all up I realy like the car but its not for me I think it was more of an impulse buy and will be selling it soon. Hope to read some replys on other owners and there thoughts

At first I was like :happy:

Then I was like :woot:

Afterwards :unsure:

And now :(

...why are you selling? PV36 is where it's at for the money!

Around the 4-5k mark for a decent system including a decent management system like Accuair. So it's not cheap.. but it will likely make the ride softer than what you currently have, plus then you can run whatever height you want. Need air tank(s), compressor(s), bags, lines from compressor to tank, lines from tank to bags, fittings, management system.

It's technically only legal if you also have the auto levelling system installed with it (and probably an engineers cert), however this will not allow you to adjust it on the fly, only when parked. I think driving mode is then set at the minimum legal height for your car too.. which doesn't sound overly fun.

If you don't go around slamming it and pumping it while driving then it's not likely that you will get done, but if you're spotted playing with it, or hard parking somewhere with it on the ground then you may get some unwanted attention haha. But it would be tempting!

www.accuair.com

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update Issues 5 (plus #4) - 10 After making a claim about issue #4's missing part, DeAgostini Japan sent a whole new issue #4 and it arrived about 2 weeks after that. That was back in early March. It took another 4 weeks to receive issues 5 - 13 though. This update is for issues 5 - 10. Ove the 5 issues the front left suspension and most of the engine have been completed. The quality of the castings and fit of the parts is quite good, it seems better than DeAgostini's BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the Fast & Furious 2 movie, which (to me anyway) doesn't seem to have as tight tolerances or quite as accurate castings.  Each issue has a lot of info about the 1989 - 1993 Skyline range and other Nissan models from that era, but the focus is on the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo and the various racing it did in Japan, Europe (Spa 24hrs) and of course Australia. I've included some text translated with Google Lens in some photos and will add to them if there's anything worth including. 
    • If it's for a SR20, make sure it's not the American Poncams, might as well call them Poocams. Had a set in a friend's car, all scuffed up after a few track days. Like the metallurgy Tomei USA used is junk. Went back to JDM OG Tomei Poncams, no issues till now.   Tomei USA is not the real OG Tomei.   Random rant over, fk the US of A, bunch of c u n t s. 
    • Most of the industry in North America either runs on Siemens or Allen Bradley. I have two redundant S7-1500's on my desk right next to me for simulation. Siemens has been losing ground though since Stuxnet, as cybersecurity is a big thing. In my line of work that is federally regulated, you must by law have a cybersecurity management program in place and its audited and inspected every so often.  I work with Emerson PLC's daily (RX3i's) and have done large biogas/refinery projects with their DCS's. Their PLC's are somewhat OK minus the way they do PLC redundancy (You have to download on both PLC's separately every time you make a change )  As for their DCS's... you'll be limited financially first before anything else stops you. Costs are exorbiant at roughly 10x what it would cost you to do with any other system (e.g AB PAC).  1990's, those suckers are brand new haha! Kraft-Heinz (An old client when I use to work for an ESP) still runs Siemens TI505 PLC's from the mid 80's. Ohh how I don't miss working with those... you could only do a certain number of online downloads until it's "Change" buffer would be full and you would then need to go offline to do a full download. There was no warning of when this was coming up and it generally would happen when you would go in at 2am to make changes before production -_-.     
    • Unfortunately, not only is that not the case, one of the main "Selling points" of safety over comms is they clearly state in writing that there's no need to segregate safety networks from non-safety networks. It always gets intermingled with everything else on an ICS/OT network. 
×
×
  • Create New...