Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, know this may seem like abit of an odd question but im mid way through the build of my track car and now im at fuel system stage. I have a seperate 50L cell with a 140gallon/hr 14psi lift pump going into a 2L surge tank. From there it goes to a single 044. From 044 then going to an Aeroflow billet rail.

Now thats where the question starts. It seems that the aeroflow rail has 3 fittings one in each end and one in the middle. Would you run pressure to either end of the rail and then run the reg off the middle port?

Also im running a Turbosmart FPR800 that has 1/8 ports in it. My plan is for 500kw so approx 600hp so within relm of the regulator.

Also if it makes any difference im running bosch 1700cc/min injectors and E85 as a fuel of choice

My thoughts are to run AN6 fuel feed lines and return lines that is 3/8 sizing most people seem to be running stock 5/16 lines with 300rwkw. Would i be correct in these assumptions?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456353-what-size-fuel-line/
Share on other sites

The Turbosmart 800 is a very small reg, 800hp at the engine is pretty close to your 500wkw mark. I would usually recommend the 1200 at that power, the added an fitting upgrade is worth the extra $40 dollars over the 1/8bspt imo.

Surprisingly the stock fuel lines should be just large enough for 450-500kw, but the 044 won't make it there. I would be picking up a Walbro 460L and dropping the pressure a little if your injectors are large enough, you might get close.

Most installations I block the mid rail return, one feed line is more than enough. I assume you have a Freddy plenum?

Yeah the fpr800 is what i already have so i was thinking go the 3/8 as that is the AN6 equivalent so to change to the FPR1200 isnt going to be a massive root around with fittings if need be down the track.

Ahk the 2 parts i have already the 044 and the FPR800 hahaha i kinda want to make them work for now but looks like i might just swap them out.

No im going to be building my own plenum similar to the Plazmaman ones. Wanting just abit more runner length just for the midrange torque benefit as its a purely hillclimb, track orientated car.

So would you just re run the stock 5/16 lines or go 3/8 either way there getting changes as there going to be moved

If you are changing/re-routing lines then going to 3/8" (~ metric equivalent 10mm) is a sensible upgrade IMO.

Probably equally important is to know what spec fuel lines you will use, and how to best anchor it. What's your plans there?

Yeah thats the plan because were going full undertray etc plan is to re route them through the cabin.

Thats the other reason i DO NOT want to be doing this twice were going to be going with full Aeroflow E85 safe PTFE teflon lined hose and all speedflow fittings so there is going to be 2k worth of hose and fittings.

I would be running dual -6 feed lines (one to each end of the rail) and a single -8 return via the FPR back to the catch can.

That way if you need to upgrade to dual 044's you won't need to change the lines.

......I personally don't think one 044 is going to push enough if you are running E85 into 1700cc injectors

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sounds like it is rotational in the driveline. CV? Tailshaft CB? Also.....didn't you just pay to have that bit painted and put on the car?
    • Yeah, when I dialled my idle down, given how much time I spent idling at the lights in traffic on my daily commute, the effect on overall fuel consumption was absolutely noticeable.
    • Emissions, fuel consumption, heat, noise, etc. most likely.
    • For me at least the reason why it bothers me is because it's indicative of a deeper problem. And that will nag at me forever. Especially because I have tailpipe emissions testing + evap leak testing every 2 years.
    • WELP. I went to the track, and I suppose it went okay because any time you can drive home is okay. You may notice the car is not on the circuit in this picture. It was about 35C day out in Benalla which means the track was approximately the surface of the sun, probably. Good things, car did not overheat but it _was_ warmer than when I had done track days in similar heat before, I think, I'm not sure - I can't quite remember. Coolant got to ~105 via the ECU after 20-30 minutes of belting it in said heat. Oil got up to 145C in one instance which is pretty crazy due to oil cooler. Pressures were fine. I seem to remember this not getting quite so high before the vents. More HMMMM'ing to be done. On the subject of HMMM'ing, can anyone identify the sounds in the video below, you will know which ones I mean: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj3BkI2cbTc I included some 'normal' sound as a reference for the first minute or so. The microphone in this instance was where the license plate is. It stopped working later in the day which is why my "best example of a lap video (not produced)" had internal audio - Isn't hearable from inside the car. I don't mean the chirping of the un-bedded/badly bedded track brakes which you can only hear while braking... Thoughts, brains trust?
×
×
  • Create New...