Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I've been checking the base timing on my RB25DET with a digital timing light.

After adjusting the CAS to display a very accurate 15 degrees against the marks on the crank pulley, I checked the Commander IGN monitor and found that the PFC was saying 18-20 degrees.

What causes this, and which should I be adjusting the CAS to agree with the Crank pulley or the PFC ?

Can sopmeone confirm the basic method of doing this, rpm's etc. so I know I'm not doing it wrong. :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45669-apexi-pfc-setting-ignition-timing/
Share on other sites

Craved,

I set the gun to 15degrees, then adjusted the CAS so the first mark (the redish one) on the crank pulley (harmonic balancer) lined up with the mark on the lower timing belt cover.

If you were looking into the engine bay, stright down on the pulley, then it was the first mark clockwise.

ie. The one with the asterix on it :)

*

|__|__|__|__|__|

-------> Direction of Rotation.

My idle RPM at the time was abt 800rpm, is this too fast ?

How do I get the PFC to agree with what I see on the timing gun ?

what if you tried setting the gun to 0, then using the timing marks on the harmonic balancer to see if it show the 18-20 degrees.. perhaps the guns out!!

should be around 4th notch if my memory is working at 3:30am :)

to get true top dead centre, drop number 1 spark plug out, check that it is on compression stroke, bring the piston all the way to the top, making sure it doesnt start its next stroke, at top dead centre see were the timing mark is at as your harmonic balancer might of slipped

to get true top dead centre, drop number 1 spark plug out, check that it is on compression stroke, bring the piston all the way to the top, making sure it doesnt start its next stroke,  at top dead centre see were the timing mark is at as your harmonic balancer might of slipped

How can the harmonic balancer slip if it's keyed on the Crank ?

Where will the timing mark be if everything is OK ?

the harmonic balancer is keyed so it cannot slip!!

although the gears up top may not be lined up properly.. take the cam cover off and see if the marks on the cam gears are lined up on both sides when the HB is at 0 or TDC!!!

what I did is set my PFC ignition settings around the idle zones to 20 degrees (GTR) so the PFC has to be giving me 20 degrees regardless then set the timing using a timing light, in the manner you described, until it reads 20 degrees...easy....

or are you describing the PFC display screen showing a timing figure changing by itself between the 18 to 20 degrees....despite that fact you have the map set at 15 in the idle zone(s)...?....

I have noticed my GTR doing exactly that during warm up mode....is your engine fully warmed Engine temp over 70 degrees C when you set the timing?

I have yet to find an accurate retard on a timing light
Oi, I try to be accurate :):D

Hmmm Intresting........I can't get my engine temp over 70 degrees at idle.

I have an N1 water pump and thermostat fitted, and it idles at about 68-70º, only ever gets over 80 degrees at the end of the 1/4, or after a sustained high speed run.

Oi, I try to be accurate :):D

Hmmm Intresting........I can't get my engine temp over 70 degrees at idle.

I have an N1 water pump and thermostat fitted, and it idles at about 68-70º, only ever gets over 80 degrees at the end of the 1/4, or after a sustained high speed run.

Thermostat?

Sorry not an N1 thermostat, but a NISMO low temp thermostat, IIRC it opens at 62ºC rather than 76.5ºC that the stock thermostat opens.

And that is why it won't go over 70 degrees, the thermostat is opening. :uh-huh:

Plus it is summer time in Scotland, if it was winter the water would be frozen anyway. :jk:

SK, I've sked before elsewhere about the engine temp, maybe you can answer this one.

The PFC has a Water Temp Correction, Cranking Time Correction, and several other corrections applied below 80ºC which is the normal running temp.

Will my engines lower running temp bring these into play, or can I disregard them as the temperature difference is minimal ?

SK, You ignoring me, or have I found one you can't answer :thumbsup:

Incidentally, The soution to the ignition timing problem required some lateral thinking.

The PFC only shows what it's own IGN Map timing is, it has no way of knowing what the actual timing is as set ont he crank pulley. So, assuming eveything is correctly setup the way forward is to adjust the static timing to match that which is displayed on the PFC. This way what the PFC outputs is relevant to the actual timing on the engine.

So, to answer my original question for future referance.......

The CAS should be adjusted so that the static timing as measured against the crank pulley (harmonic balancer) matches that displayed on the PFC, at idle.

SK, I've sked before elsewhere about the engine temp, maybe you can answer this one.

The PFC has a Water Temp Correction, Cranking Time Correction, and several other corrections applied below 80ºC which is the normal running temp.

Will my engines lower running temp bring these into play, or can I disregard them as the temperature difference is minimal ?

Yes, you lose power under 80 degrees.

I cut and pasted this from another thread that i contributed to....could be use ful just to make sure you get the pulley in the right spot,and ofcourse to fix those people up that think the pulley cant move or be out of position :thumbsup:

First of all to be anal you would want to make sure the crank pulley is accurate(of which it will not be)To do this put a degree wheel on the front and line the "0" up to the original TDC mark,then get an old sparkplug with the guts taken out and a bolt welded in it(make sure it hangs out an inch or so)Put the piston down at BDC and screw the modded sparkplug in.Turn your engine clockwise untill the piston hits the plug.Write down the figure on the degree wheel,then go anticlockwise and write that figure down.Then after work out the half way point from the two figures you got and move the wheel to that point......Now you have your True TDC stamp the front pully with a chisel(however this possition may change after time,so i like to scribe the mark down onto the centre of the pulley and check it out now and then)My pulley was out about 3 degrees or so....I have never seen one thats right!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're not wrong, but more than a few times I've heard of people running into issues where their injector characterization isn't quite right and that approach works for that specific configuration but once they switch over to a new set they discover a whole bunch of stuff wasn't set up correctly. It's slightly more annoying to reverse engineer the OEM MAF transfer function but you already have the sensor wired up to the factory harness so keeping it around for a few weeks more while you figure out the tune is easy enough. I've seen GM also use a combination of both MAF + MAP in their ECUs before, MAF is for steady state and a calculation of the cylinder VE to correct the base VE table, then in transients it uses that calculated VE + raw MAP to determine cylinder filling somehow.
    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
×
×
  • Create New...