Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, here's the first thing you have to do. Measure the length of every single one of the arms you took out of the rear (centre of pivot to centre of pivot). THESE are the lengths that you know will work well without too much bump steer.

If you put all those adjustable arms in because you were forced to in order to fit wheels in or something, then at this point you might be screwed. But if you've just done it for fun, then you could set all your new arms to those lengths and probably find it's all better. Then you can make some small tweaks to get the camber right and hope you don't mess it up.

Otherwise, you're looking at an exercise and a half. See here. http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456906-slotting-lca-for-more-cambertrack-what-about-the-rear/?view=findpost&p=7539791

Starting with the aftermarket adjustable arms at the same centre-to-centre lengths as the OEM gear is a great start.

However if you've dropped ride height as nearly everyone does, then you need to make adjustments. The fact those replacement arms are adjustable takes the hard work out of things, and Duncan obviously needed to comply with race category regs in slotting pivot points.

With a selection of basic tools and some inexpensive to make/obtain gear it is possible to set up the rear suspension without trial/error and guess work. A piece of string, ruler, and a jack can be very useful. It will take time and patience, but you can definitely sort it so that you know exactly what toe change occurs and that you are then not experiencing bump steer if/when it's getting taily.

So, we are talking rear bump steer right? Adjusted through traction rods, which you now have?

if you have a dial indicator, making a bump-steer gauge is pretty easy, no shortage of pics for reference on google. Mine cost me about $20 in materials from Bunnings. The dial indicator is the most expensive part. I can send you some pics of mine if you need.

For reference - my car is dropped about 30mm. It was a while back now I did it but from what I recall when I adjusted for minimal steer under bump, it would then bind more under droop, so compromise was needed. The 'best' setting I found was set the rear camber to where you want first, then start with the traction rod at stock length, and then increase it by the same percentage length as I had increased the camber arm. That setting has worked fine for me and gave the best bump/droop readings so hadn't worried about it any more than that, but then again I'm not track-ing the car.

Yeah the car ride height is lowered as I have aftermarket shocks on which is where the problem has occurred. I'm really way out of my depth here and don't really know what I'm talking about. The guys who fixed up all my handling issues said the last issue they can see with it is the bump steer and said I needed to find a kit / adapter to go between the tie rod and the upright. Something about moving something approximately 40mm down.

Anyway, thanks heaps for the info guys. When I have a bit more time I will look into it more as it looks like their is a lot of info I need to get my head around so I understand exactly what I'm chasing.

If you just want to fix the tie rod angle (it should be parallel to the ground like the LCA), moonface or Ikeya formula sell this spaced down Tie rod end:

http://www.rhdjapan.com/moonface-racing-bump-adjust-tie-rod-end-set.html

Or you can wait for GKtech to release their RCA correction kit for R-chassis

http://www.gktech.com/index.php/s14-s15-40mm-roll-center-correction-kit.html

Or you can just get their full knuckle replacement which already has RC adjustment built into it

http://www.gktech.com/index.php/r-chassis-r32-r33-r34-front-super-lock-knuckles.html

Only thing is, they are built for more lock (drift oriented)

If you just want to fix the tie rod angle (it should be parallel to the ground like the LCA), moonface or Ikeya formula sell this spaced down Tie rod end:

http://www.rhdjapan.com/moonface-racing-bump-adjust-tie-rod-end-set.html

Or you can wait for GKtech to release their RCA correction kit for R-chassis

http://www.gktech.com/index.php/s14-s15-40mm-roll-center-correction-kit.html

Or you can just get their full knuckle replacement which already has RC adjustment built into it

http://www.gktech.com/index.php/r-chassis-r32-r33-r34-front-super-lock-knuckles.html

Only thing is, they are built for more lock (drift oriented)

None of those things fix the problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's excellent but I'm still breaking it in so I'm not 100% sure where it'll end up. I would say it's about 15% heavier than stock and the smoothness of the slip zone is quite progressive but you need to be a little patient compared to stock or it'll bite hard and stall. Stock I got away with absolutely horrid clutch control. Like I said before I couldn't even tell where the clutch would grab when it was stock so releasing way too quickly without enough revs it would just slip and the revs would drop lower than ideal but that would be the end of it. Currently there's a bit of a nasty clutch judder if I don't apply enough revs + find the exact wrong point of the slip point in the clutch pedal but it feels like it's slowly resolving as I drive it more. I would not recommend the competition clutch unless you really need the extra clamp force. I think this clutch combined with the Nismo operating cylinder is going to be exactly what I want. Enough bite that you need to remember the release point to avoid stalling or rough shifts, but progressive enough that it's not hard to drive by any means and not heavy at all. I tried a "super single" clutch on my friend's 997.2 Turbo 6MT and that was absolutely horrid. It runs an electrohydraulic power steering pump for the clutch power boost so there's zero feedback in the clutch pedal and there was a horrific clutch shudder well after break-in due to the lack of marcel springs or hub springs in the friction disk. It felt like the slip zone was the thickness of a single toe twitch as well so it was almost impossible to avoid stalling it unless you gave it a ton of revs and just dumped the clutch instead of trying to be smooth with it. I was terrified of pulling out in front of traffic. I have also tried some kind of "super single" on an EK9 and that makes this twin plate Coppermix look like a stock clutch. Releasing the clutch pedal even slightly too quickly feels like you're getting rear-ended. The pedal is extremely heavy as well and there's no vacuum assist like the GTR.
    • Yeah, well I was probably way underguessing the $300 figure anyway. Just multiplied a "normal" by 4 for the purposes of pointing out it's not cheap, particularly if it has to be repeated.
    • We have an alignment shop out here that does what you're talking about but he wants like 800 AUD a pop. DIY is "cheaper" but once you start accounting for the value of your time I'm not sure it's worth it.
    • The main catch phrase for any car is "the eye of the beholder", and "personal tastes and preferences" And as for the plastic "flares", I honestly think they look cheap and tacky, and I cannot see them aging well, maybe if they were body colour they might look better to my eyes, but, I would still prefer it the were more like the older WRX STI models that had the wider body metal panels In saying all this 5hit, I wouldn't buy a new WRX again, even if it had the wide body metal panels    
×
×
  • Create New...