Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Has anyone ever tried doweling the main stud girdle to the block to eliminate girdle walk, while not also having to deal with added below the block height that girdle plate/adapter plates make?

I figure it could be done with a bunch of 8mm tool steel dowels next to the main bolts, or alternatively with hollow chromoly dowels that would slip over the main studs and be recessed into the block and girdle.

Doing this as opposed to heading down the billet main cap/girdle plate path would mean no align bore needed, so typical wet sump pumps are still able to be used.

I would argue that it would be just as strong from a main-cap perspective too, as eliminating girdle walk ties the girdle and the block together more firmly.

Where as an alloy billet main cap can still walk on the block, and is relying entirely on the rigid strength of the plate to reduce block flex to reduce main cap walk.

Any thoughts?

I can't speak for the RB

but i've know guys who have had very limited success on Holden V8s and Clevelands.

The caps still walked, but not as much. The issue was fixed by going to steel 4 bolt mains caps.

But given the RB has a girdle it should work better.

Dowels aren't really for holding things in place, just aligning.

I would try to machine edges on the girdle and block, and fit correctly sized keys either side of the girdle between the block.

Dowels aren't really for holding things in place, just aligning.

I would try to machine edges on the girdle and block, and fit correctly sized keys either side of the girdle between the block.

For a cylinder head, yes I'd agree.

But what I have in mind is more like you'd see on a connecting rod, with a dowel that is hollow, tapered and is an interference fit into the block and girdle cap.

This is only speculation but if someone could x-ray a block they may be able to get an idea of whether going a 4 bolt main cap was possible like old Holden V8's and many others? There's the added benefit of locking everything together by stopping the bottom of the block expanding.

It may throw the whole thing out of whack though by introducing new stresses onto the block.

The caps are all tied together by the girdle so cap walking is not that much of a issue on RB engines.

Lets also not forget that to set the thrust bearing face, we need to be able to walk the center cap, when they are tied, they all will walk to set it.

If the caps were individual id say pinning would be needed.

Hollow centering caps like on the rods are not designed for side loads, they are for accurate positioning of the cap for tightening, neither would hollow pins be any good as they are weak for side loads, for accurate firm centering you would need tapered solid pins.

To do it is not hard, you can buy the tapered pins in long lengths and cut them to the tapered section width you need, the reamers are available from engineer supplies as are the pins (not cheap i might add)

The issue is there is not much room/meat in the block or girdle to place a pin without weakening both.

I looked into it as ive done the solid tapered pin mod to 265 Hemi engines mains in the past.

I even pinned in the big end bearings into the rods on 265's in the same way in the past to combat bearings spinning from rod bolt stretch.

  • 3 weeks later...

I've dowelled the billet main caps to the block many times now with custom made en26 dowels. Been doing it for big hp drag engines for the last 3+ years. It works very well and it makes the machining and assembly process far easier and quicker.

I doubt if you could get away with dowelling the factory girdle and block and not require a tunnel hone at the minimum.

I machined up hollow dowels to locate around the main studs in case you wanted to know. I've had no dramas with this method to date. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...