Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have read the many forums about the pro's of doing this mod, so I bought myself a spare pipe from Ebay and had the divider put in.

Does it feel any different? Not sure. The weather is cold so it's very responsive anyway at the moment.... Might be placebo effect but it feels more punchy from 2-3.5K. On boost feels the same.

My question is:

Did you notice the turbo spool noise inside the cabin become more pronounced? I noticed that the turbo's "sound" quite different inside the cabin. Slightly more whiney/whizzy i suppose.

Since your car makes a million horsepower If it's good enough for you it's good enough for me

It's a very lazy design from Nissan, regardless. It makes a huge difference. I have done a back to back test with Marko_R1's car. 3.0 and -10's. Without it, it chided like a steam train. With it, 90% of the shuffle went away. GT-RS's suck dick either way, but that is a first hand experience.

There are NO downsides to doing this mod.

Would be good to see a before and after dyno run if anyone has done it.

+1, or even a flow check/pressure drop measurement of each.

Downside could be lower bang for buck than some other mod, when using smaller non-shuffling turbos. Piggaz - would you do this on a car with stock turbos? -7s?

Was planning to do a before and after on Daz's car, as he plans to run one if it helps with flow. Should help even on a stock car as the front turbo entry is pretty bad.

Cheap and inconspicuous, I like those kind of mods.

+1, or even a flow check/pressure drop measurement of each.

Downside could be lower bang for buck than some other mod, when using smaller non-shuffling turbos. Piggaz - would you do this on a car with stock turbos? -7s?

Micko's old man just threw this pipe on his -9/stock engine GTR. From the seat of the pants it feels a little more linear.

If you look at the pipe, the front turbo air is basically "merging" at a right angle to the incoming air from the rear huffer.

I believe Sean Morris did a back to back years ago. He was claiming 8-10 hp increase from memory. Have a search online. You should be able to find it. I can't remember the turbo setup he tested it on though.

Just do it, put it on and forget about it.

  • Like 1

here's a picture of my first gtr back in 2004, it had a polished cusco hot pipe and from memory it was very well made and I'm pretty sure when I looked inside it the merge was better than 90 degrees more like 45 degrees and it looked just a smidge bigger in diameter also.

post-60000-14331296415259_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys, Just want some advice on r34 GTT ac system. Since I’ve owned it, the ac compressor, doesn’t matter the set temperature or ambient temperature, runs for around 10 seconds then disengages the clutch, then re-engages everywhere 30 seconds or so and keeps repeating this.    is this normal?   I had it recharged today as it was slightly low and thought it would fix it but still does it. it cools fine in summer even prior to the recharge, except for the usual warmup when stopped or in traffic (still yet to wire overheat fan to on with ac)   any thoughts would be much appreciated 
    • To plug the hole. The engine plant may not have known whether the car it was going into had a gauge or not. It was a long time ago and the integrations might not have been fully modern. Or they might not have cared because the extra inventory and processes to save a few cents on the sender might have cost more anyway. But please tell me you are not still confusing the idea of a pressure gauge sender, and an oil pressure light switch. The switch will be out there. In a separate hole. Probably with only one wire running to it. Running the light.
    • Blower needs to go low on the exhaust side, displacing the AC and PS, which you have to decide whether you want to keep and how and where to relocate if you do. Electric option for PS is, at least, helpful. Sadly, there is no workable 12V electric AC of any value. Whilst the blower is the last compression step before the throttle, and so it might seem a good idea to have it near the inlet manifold (as mentioned above), you probably want it to go through an intercooler first, so, having it on the opposite side of the car facilitates that air flow path. The turbo discharges into the blower, so proximity of the turbo's compressor outlet to the blower's inlet is nice. But then you might want to intercool that too, before boosting it again....which would probably be a ball ache. Routing pipes out to the front and back could be a bit shit. If there was room for (at least) a small (but preferably larger) water to air core on that side, then that would probably be the best approach. I guess a reasonable alternative would be to locate the blower where the alternator is (more or less, associated with the inlet manifold, per Matt's thought), and somehow incorporate a water to air core into the manifold, sort of like they do for modern blown V8s. The big difference here though is that those V8s have only the one throttle (upstream the blower) and only the one compression step (the blower) and no need for too much in the way of bypass/blowoff valves. Whereas in a twin charged 6, you do need to think about one or two bypass valves associated with the 2 compressors and you would prefer to have the intercooling done before the air has to pass through the throttle. You'd like the throttle to work approx the same no matter what the compression is doing. But if it is located in hot air stream before a cooler, then sometimes the air will be real hot, sometimes it will be quite cool, and the throttle mapping/response will be quite different between those two cases. The throttle, if sized for hot air, would be too large for cold conditions. It's all a ball ache.
    • Package SC on exhaust side. Remote mount turbo. Still a fair bit of room when you get creative on the inlet side of the motor too. Especially if you can get really creative with the welding, and effectively build it into the bottom of the inlet manifold. Would definitely take some design work, and some trial and error, to make sure flow works well still! Might be easier to just start with the Nissan March though... All the work is already done for you...
    • I'll sit down and get a post together 😁
×
×
  • Create New...