Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's more of an anything that's not petrol sensor, it's reading the ratio of petrol not ethanol. So if you get e85 then add 5% water it should read as e90, as demonstrated at the sau/wolf e85 tech night last year. As long as methanol mixes with petrol and doesn't separate i don't see an issue. If you're using this for water/meth injection then it won't work as the sensor can't differentiate the two. You should probably look into the effects methanol has on certain metals and decide if the sensor will cope.

Edited by linkems

yeh, steve had that, then we did wmi, and ended up with 2 degrees more timing on wmi, but same power as his ignition system was a joke and flatlined up top

both setups did 30 psi and took 20-22 degrees of timing on 98 wmi and 98 +10 percent meth

Ive used e85 and wi together aswell

Im building another car atm. Will be wmi..but if can't get to 35psi ish on just pump 98..ill be doing the same as your planning...f**k e85..i want to drive it everywhere..not to one random servo 40 minutes away..

plenty of other people have played with it in more quantity when e85 coudnt be bought for a while ...I think 60 percent meth/40 percent 98 is close to e85. But you probally dont need that much octane..

how much wmi your spraying atm? what fuel to wmi percentage?

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Darren, Im only running around 8% of total fuel in WMI, im soon to test with a second nozzle and up to 15%.

Yea the amount of E85 available in SA servos is crap, and none at all in country areas, so thats why im wanting to do the meth flex fuel.

Do you know much about the sensors, and if they would work from 0 to 15% meth/pump mix?

I cant get a clear answer anywhere on this

thats f**kall....i run 20 percent with a 50/50 mix.

Nah can't help with the sensor, i have no idea. ll just do as scott said and mix it up as i use it if i have to go that way, but i think i'll have traction issues before i get to that level

cheers

darren

My understanding is the sensor measures whats petrol and convert it back to whats left as E85.

So if it reads 30% petrol content it displays that as E70 (converts it over as the balance being ethanol)

And having said that, they can be tricked and are therefore highly inaccurate in situations where the fuel may be contaminated with water, it will read crazy high meth content with some water contamination, and methanol tends to absorb water easily so in real life its highly possible.

There are many clips online where ethanol content sensors are tested, water added, watch the results, scary stuff considering that servo pump fuel tanks are vented to atmosphere.

Wouldn't you love your flex tune to advance the timing while you got a bad batch of water contaminated E85 after running on 98? :)

We had that SAU E85 night a Sabdinnies last year, was a real eye opener, add a bit of 98 to E85 and watch the E85 content drop dramatically, add just a little water to E60 and watch it become E100......scary shit.

They designed it to be scary shit Peter. Don't believe the hype. I do agree that the sensor is easily tricked, but water just doesn't get absorbed like that unless you leave the tank cap off in the rain.

Daz dropped his GTR off here for fabrication after his 2630 was built, we drained the tank as it had been sitting in Barry's workshop for a year and a half with no engine, open fuel lines and rail. After cleaning the injectors and lines he didn't want to run the old fuel, so I drained it and put in in my evo.

Thanks for the free fuel Darren, it ran fine at 32 pounds. AFR's were perfect, no det obviously. :P

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When's the rear mounted turbo kit coming? Needs dose and V8 chop idle lol.
    • I was very unimpressed with how the car came up from the A pillar forward, before I hit things (twice). It all has to go. It had to go, but now it has to go... more. So we finally found the very first Shennanigans with the entirely perfectly setup engine that had no problems being pulled apart to improve on 'was perfectly fine'. Cam bearings looked a bit... stock. Which isn't entirely bad given they were stock and this is a ~20 year old engine. So new cam bearings are on the way because it's somewhat difficult to get to this stage to do it later, and it will trash the block. It was quite unusual that it wasn't done when the perfectly new-looking VCM cam was originally installed by [unknown] What IS unusual is the cam that was installed there was advanced SIX degrees. As to why there is no way to know.. however it could have been @Dose Pipe Sutututu's mate who wanted a larger cam sound but also wanted it to come on earlier to be more usable. This is my dyno sheet with the previous setup - This cam is not supposed to peak until 7000+ RPM, according to VCM. This is what lead me down the whole 'my heads/intake setup is running out of puff and can't support the cam' line of thinking to begin with. Anyway too late now - New cam is in! It could be rather funny if this smaller cam acts like a larger cam because it isn't advanced six degrees. In the spirit of everything is working amazingly - the COMP cam required no dialling in whatsoever. It was about 0.5 degrees advanced, which seems pretty bang on. Any adjustment either way would be further out. In the spirit of everything was previously working amazingly - The timing gear that was taken out turned out to be was an N-Motion double timing chain kit, with adjustable cam gear (which is how it was 6 degrees advanced) and all looks entirely perfectly new. It also had a Torrington bearing, which was one of the reasons I ended up getting the Cloyes kit which they used in the C5R 24 hour racecar - Because I couldn't confirm what was in the engine when talking to Tony Mamo. I did believe however it was a Double chain kit of some kind... but found no supporting documentation or evidence for it.
    • I recently did this to my R33 with the full set from Car Mats Direct, they can't do the vinyl anymore that's advertised on the website due to a supplier issue so I ended up with the Black Loop Pile which looks great. I went all out with rubber sound deadening sheets from Repco and also added the sound deadening foam layer option with the carpet. Makes a world of difference and got rid of all the weird smells in the 29 year old interior. It was a bit of work but I'd 100% recommend it, Car Mats Direct had awesome customer service and quick postage. Replaced my seats with some sporty ones from Autotechnia while I was at it, feels like a new car.
    • Got the motor out and torn down. I'll be dropping off the block Monday. Luckily the scoring on Cyl6 is much less pronounced then the pictures made it out to seem. It can barely be felt. If you pass your finger over it 10x you'll barely notice it. Hopefully by some chance it will only require a honing. I'm not in the mood to buy one size larger pistons or another block. Oddly enough my 6th cylinder with the scoring has extremely clean intake valves compared to my other 5 cylinders. I'm worried the scoring was caused by too much fuel or Water/Methanol washing the cylinder. I'll review some old logs to confirm.  This was also the first time I pull an engine with the transmission still attached. It went much better then expected. I was worried my CD009 wouldn't make it easy due to its sheer size but it was much easier this way. 
    • From the pictures I have when doing the job the flywheel is the same diameter, I don't think they're playing weird tricks like putting weights at the outer diameter to increase flywheel inertia or anything like that. The OEM flywheel is definitely heavier, but it's not a huge difference. Quoted weight savings of the clutch is 2 kg so I can't imagine the flywheel being lighter than ~7 kg. Kind of regret not weighing it before the clutch went into the car but as far as driveability goes I have no complaints.
×
×
  • Create New...