Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday everyone,

Ive been having some dramas with intercooler piping blowing off ( RB25DET series 2, standard turbo [12 PSI only], front mount intercooler and front facing plenum in a R32) so have replaced all the joiners with new silicone joiners and T bar clamps on the whole lot.

On the hot side, there is 10 to 20mm movement, by hand, of the piping. Common sense tells me this is needed as the engine will move under load etc but i dont want it to be a cause for pipes to continue blowing off.

Should the moventment be a problem?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/457087-hot-side-piping-question/
Share on other sites

No, movement shouldn't be a problem.

A lot of people assume that those T clamps are better. They're actually not. Very good quality conventional hose clamps are the best. Make sure your pipes have sufficient weld bead at the ends to give something to clamp against. Use a cleaner (window cleaner or similar to clean the pipes and hoses before assembly, and you can use it as an assembly lube if they're too sticky once cleaned.

  • Like 1

i have to disagree. Good T clamps allow for the clamp to be taken off and put back on with no structural damage to the clamp.. ever. Cheap conventional hose clamps won't work, period. Good quality conventual hose clamps may get away with being taken off and put back on 4-5 times, after this they start to tighten on an angle and eventually strip/bend/snap the ladder section.

And what type of movement?

The standard silicone joiners are softer and allow movement of the pipe because when it's under load the intercooler is stationary to the chassis, the engine and pipework is not. I have not had a problem with aftermarket thicker/tighter ones though.

Is it possible your engine has too much movement?

Do you have lips on all your pipework?

The lip and clamp will cause a barrier where the lip cannot move passed the clamp. The hot side elbow should have a small one already.

I think the existing hose clamps had been on a off a few times are were warping as others have said, i hadnt changed them since buying the car.

I have had the engine out at DVS Jez workshop and he changed an engine mount while it was there if my memory is correct. But i will stick my head under the car and double check.

Yep thats the other thing i did, put a bead on all the pipes that didnt have one so there is something to grip against.

Every Tbolt clamp I have pressure tested leaks badly, as there is no clamp pressure between the points where the bolt does up. I only use standard Norma style worm clamps, they should only be tightened when the engine bay is hot, too hard and they will fail obviously.

Running up to 40psi with no dramas here.

Yep tbolt clamps are big bulky and you need to do them up ridiculously tight, the norma worm gear spring tension clamps are the best have never had a pipe blow off also make sure all your pipes are lipped at the end.

Are the pipes clean and oil/grease free (silicone joiners as well)?

Wipe them all with wax and grease remover so they can grip well. I havent had any problems with t-bolt clamps and i think one of my pipes doesnt have a bead. Running 23psi

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...