Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Could someone please confirm the date of this service (I suspect it's August 31 2013).

Does this mention anything about a timing belt replacement?

A general translation would be appreciated.

Cheers... Bob.

post-78207-0-42908200-1434880646_thumb.jpg

It's a sticker which indicates to a subsequent owner that maintenance should be carried out at regular intervals.

The top paragraph is about watchfulness of engine and running gear maintenance.

The bottom paragraph is about watchfulness of heater, air conditioning and filter maintenance.

The Kms at the bottom right is the figure travelled up to the date of exchange. And the exchange date is the 31st August of the 25th year of the Japanese calendar.

Hope this helps says Maria.

  • Like 1

The Kms at the bottom right is the figure travelled up to the date of exchange. And the exchange date is the 31st August of the 25th year of the Japanese calendar.

Hope this helps says Maria.

Thanks Terry,

So........... "Date of exchange"......... Last service completed?

25th year of the Japanese calendar = 2013?

Ta......... Sorry I'm a bit slow so please type slowly.

Bob.

The stickers only for cabin/pollen filters, it explains what it does and says nothing about the engine or other mechanical gear maintenance

It also says that the cabin filter should be changed yearly or every 12000km whichever comes first

As for the exchange date- it's when it was last done, but it's due for a new filter according to the recommendation on the sticker anyway since we're in 2015 already

Edited by chiksluvit
  • 2 months later...

does anyone know what these are?

21022157179_b3411ca0f8_c.jpg20150907_141153 by Oliver K, on Flickr

20585587314_6ef1431453_b.jpg20150907_141205 by Oliver K, on Flickr

21210710295_8df59ff820_b.jpg20150907_141236 by Oliver K, on Flickr

21210709715_c835596833_b.jpg20150907_141242 by Oliver K, on Flickr

thank you in advance!

I know what the last one (placed on the underside of the bonnet) says.

It tells how the car has beautiful lacquer paint and to be extra careful when using anything that may damage said finish.

In other words, no harsh chemicals when washing the car.

The stickers only for cabin/pollen filters, it explains what it does and says nothing about the engine or other mechanical gear maintenance

It also says that the cabin filter should be changed yearly or every 12000km whichever comes first

As for the exchange date- it's when it was last done, but it's due for a new filter according to the recommendation on the sticker anyway since we're in 2015 already

you're thinking of these stickers

IMAG0112_zpsti4qclba.jpg

yes they are different pollen filter stickers.usually located in the glovebox. they state the 12000kms you defined the OP's sticker supposedly said.

Edit: shit sorry, i didnt see the 12,000kms bit at the bottom of OP's pic. there you go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
×
×
  • Create New...