Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Anthony is SST autos as well and has lost a lot of time with this car.

The Manifold is nothing to do with SST and yet we put in all the time needed then cop net bagging and you wonder why we get upset.We suppled an ECU and tryed to tune it when this problem showed up so how is it our fault

PER4MANZ used one of our manifolds today and its perfect but we didnt have the manifolds when grant needed one for your car.

The manifold. All 6 pipes collect just under the turbo flange pointing at the turbo opening so as the revs rise the gas wont turn to exit thru the waste gate.

Hey, everyone...

SAU = No Workshop bagging environment, or hinting towards it please.

Posts edited accordingly.

I aint handed out warnings on this occasion as im not having a bad day for a change.

So take that as a blessing :cheers:

That being said, Steve-SST and his workshop are well respected around here.

And his son has an awesome GTS-R too, maybe i'll be able to come over for a dual photo session this year :)

I had no problems with you and Anthony and as previuosly mentioned, i understand the situation and have worked along side all of you to try and fix this problem.

******

I was not given an option other than i had to wait 2 weeks for the manifold i have now, nothing was mentioned about your supply of manifolds.I never said i want a monifold NOW, subsequently i was supplied one that doesnt work! (for the record i want people reading this to acknowledge the fact that Grant from PER4ORMANZ has been more than helpfull in trying to resolve this, he also has put in time to sort this out,).But unfortunately i still have a car that makes uncontrollable boost.I now have to by pass the middle men and go to the manifold maker, who is talking go smaller turbo ( GT 25 or 30 ). Sure i am willing to try this but i must admitt it sounds like a patch rather than cure.

It looks like i am on my own now because it's all to hard.

What have i done to deserve this apart from engage proffesional services to do a simple job?

My belief is that a more mature approach should have be taken on all parties behalf and sort this problem out, what more can i realistically say!

Anthony is SST autos as well and has lost a lot of time with this car.

The Manifold is nothing to do with SST and yet we put in all the time needed then cop net bagging and you wonder why we get upset.We suppled an ECU and tryed to tune it when this problem showed up so how is it our fault

PER4MANZ used one of our manifolds today and its perfect but we didnt have the manifolds when grant needed one for your car.

The manifold. All 6 pipes collect just under the turbo flange pointing at the turbo opening so as the revs rise the gas wont turn to exit thru the waste gate.

Piont taken, not bagging but stating simple facts.No one wants to be put in this situation, it's time consumming ,frustrating and most concerning it strains relationships within the club membership , i for one don't want this but one has to stand up for what is correct.

SAU = No Workshop bagging environment, or hinting towards it please.

Posts edited accordingly.

I aint handed out warnings on this occasion as im not having a bad day for a change.

So take that as a blessing ;)

That being said, Steve-SST and his workshop are well respected around here.

And his son has an awesome GTS-R too, maybe i'll be able to come over for a dual photo session this year :rofl:

  • 3 weeks later...
Steve you owe a few people an apologies.  You in fact know dick about manifold design an or turbocharger selection.  Yes it is best to keep each exhaust pulse separate and unmolested right up to and as CLOSE TO THE TURBINE INLET.  Over boosting in this situation is not a result of a bad manifold  but your own inability to problem solve and identify the problem.  The problem has now been solved and has been shown to be a problem with two cylinders running excessively rich causing a anti lag effect. The car now has no boost control problems along with other vehicles running these exact same manifolds (most of which produce 400+ RWHP with internally standard RB25).

I WONT FLAME YOU ANYMORE AIDS FACE INSTEAD I MIGHT JUST COME DOWN AND PUNCH YOUR SMELLY **** IN.  IT WOULD HAVE BEEN NICE TO WATCH THOSE YOU HAVE IRRESPONSIBLY SLANDERED KICK THE PISS OUT OF YOU.  BUT THESE GUYS ARE TO NICE SO THAT IS WHY I MIGHT TAKE IT UPON MYSELF TO OVERSEE A LITTLE JUSTICE, YOU BLOODY ****RIDING, SQUAT TO PISS, LIMP WRISTED, SHIRT LIFTING, ARSE CLOWN.

Funny stuff, i hear this car is still in trouble so we will wait and see.

I don't think this guy likes you very much Steve. :headspin:

PS; I really would like to see a picture of the offending manifold, I have heard of this sort of stuff but (like the Yeti) never actually seen it. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...