Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Good luck with using a smaller turbo - how is that going to fix things? Am I missing something?

If the gasses wont waste - then it is pretty easy to see that there is a problem with the manifold, especially if you know the turbo is a good thing, and the wastegate is a good thing.

It seems to me that if the gasses arent wasting with the wastegate removed, there must be some crazy turbulance happening (high pressure and low pressure systems, you probably got a whole weather system happening in there!...j/k). If this has happened already, it would be pretty hard to believe that all the rest of the manifold is a good thing - manifold design is pretty critical to optimum performance.

Sorry to say this, but I believe the only real solution would be to ditch the manifold you have and get a new one - one that has proven results and works, especially if you have evidence of its performance with a similar sized turbo/engine combo.

Good luck. I have had to cut my losses in the past, sometimes its the only way.

There certainly is alot more to getting the best out of a turbo setup than it appears on the surface. Even a change of a couple of mm in pipe diameter in a manifold can make a noticeable difference to response and driveability, seen it with my own eyes - its tricky business. No wonder an experienced mechanic/tradesman likes to guard hard leant secrets and charge a few dollars more than the local autotune fellas - and so they should, its expensive business.

My motto: the good feeling of a well done job lasts alot longer than the smile you get from saving a few dollars - fortuneately there are places around like SST and Performanz that do put in the extra, learn lessons the hard way, and are able to guide noobs like me when things go cactus. Could you imagine what would happen if you took a problem like this to your local garage mechanic:)

anyway, my 0.02c

And Ditto on the manifold photo request, cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
    • Dort sounds above 3k rpm are dorty 🤣 I might krinkle black the alloy 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...