Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Been working on it doing a little bit at a time

To clean the engine bay up a little more I moved the battery into boot

A9EB8BB4-B3C0-4EEE-B103-87231CECFC5D.jpg

Started with it in the normal place, which it never fit correctly due to being to short

E3F18747-9190-4C2B-93D5-641883E58F6E.jpg Ran the wiring through the car to hide it all

Then bought a battery tray from one stop batteries and proceeded to mount it in the boot

Started by putting 4x 8mm rivnuts into the boot floor

8D2A5B58-AB58-4B74-9BC5-1DD459FFEF9F.jpg

After vacuuming out the metal shavings I then bolted the battery tray into position 28AB60C8-28C3-456B-8FFD-BEFA16A96BC5.jpg

There is a big main fuse behind the battery for exactly that reason, the wiring is also secured down (didn't get a photo of it) and any where there are sharp edges there is rubber lining them to even further prevent that from happening

Test fitted it to make sure i didn't stuff up my measurements

192BF300-A942-47AF-BA4B-1114774EDCE9_1.j

Made and welded a bracket to go to the original bolt hole for the battery bracket and put a filter on, had planed to do something a bit different for that but the neatest way ended up being to just fit the filter there

7B5A4E4B-A377-4440-8AEA-440D7428FB29.jpg

Then after another trip to the fitting shop I swapped the 90° fittings for some 45s and made up the lines and fitted them

14D76D4C-1A30-461E-A4F8-EECD45B2C4D7.jpg

Im going to grab some hose spacer/holders for the lines to tidy it up a little, I also plan to powder coat the catch can but that can wait for now

  • 3 weeks later...

Had the car detailed by Eugene and what a difference he was able to make to the paint. It now has so much more depth and the swirl marks are all gone. It has actually changed the colour of the car (in a good way) and it looks like the day I purchased it in 2003 again

The reason for having it detailed was I had entered it into the show and shine at the Gtr festival at wisd today

Quick snap taken by the wife

F6472B47-E25E-4E75-AC90-EAF6059594DA.jpg

Oh and I changed the wheels lol :D

  • Like 3
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

Been a while but have been really the last couple of months 

a couple of months ago I decided I'd go for a drive to gosford with it. Well I didn't make it due to a it over heating and had it towed back 

got home and opened the radiator and blocked would have been an improvement compared to what I could see in there

IMG_4189.JPG

  • 1 month later...

When you installed the valve springs, did you find it unnecessary to upgrade the retainers aswell?

Only asking, as ill be putting cams and headstuds into my car, and thought while I was there would up upgrade the springs and possibly the retainers. 

 

The springs I used didn't require retainers, I'm also not reving the engine fast enough and by using the original ones it also meant I knew I wouldn't have to adjust any of the valve clearances 

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
    • Yup but for me its the HR ! Cut my teeth on the old holden 6s in the day ! And here's me thinking in the day it was also the 300ZX and the Mitsubishi GT3000 ! All, as well had good lines, but always seemed to need finishing off, style wise.
    • A 180SX has a much better look than a FD. The roofline is far superior being a fastback. It's popups look better. In a world where we all subconsciously add a little bit of low, and wheels of our preference, it's just more handsome than the FD is. The FD just looks 'bubbly' in comparison. It can come down to preference, sure. But "The FD is the BEST looking (on appearances alone) 90's JDM car without question?" Nah. Plenty of questions lol. I could think of 8 cars I think look fundamentally better, and probably a handful of ones that look about on par with a FD. (like say a SW20 MR2) I feel people like/overrate the FD because of it's mythicality/rarity, its rotary and it's unpredictable nature. It probably drives great, you can stuff a ton of tyre under there, has a unique sound, light as hell. I feel that people reading this thinking "YOU CANT RATE A 180 ABOVE A FD BECAUSE A 180 IS A CHEAP DRIFT BUCKET" prove the point about bias as to what the car represents, moreso than how it actually looks.. I feel the 80's boxy/squared off look is becoming better looking due to time, and 90's melted soap bar aesthetics have not aged well. (yet?) And this thread is purely about looks :p
    • A red or yellow S15 wins my vote, Ack that it just scraps in with the 90's cars theme, but they are great looking little sports car Next would be a A80 Supra (pre face lift), whilst the A80 has its own issues, I feel is the best looking larger GT car As for the FD, "I" feel that the reason it triggers me in a non-positve way when looking at one, is like looking at a high maintenance pretty girl who you know is mentally unstable and likely to explode for no apparent reason
×
×
  • Create New...