Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey folks,

got the rb20 back in my rx-7 and sourced a stock ecu to replace my mines tuned ecu. Seems to pull as hard, runs about 15-16 afr's running down the road and quickly changes to 10-11 when throttle is opened. If you back off it richens down to 8's and goes to the 14.5-16 again.

Which I can live with, car pulls very hard. and creeps around 14 psi high in the rev range. However the car feels like it is completely shutting off at about 6000RPM in 3rd gear and has done this consistently since i have swaped the ecu.

I do not have the transmission wiring wired as I never got the lower harness. As well my rx7 dash is run by the speedo drive and does output a signal to the ecu.

I am thinking it is one of three things.

AFM air flow cut

knock sensor

speed sensor.

Anyone know of a bypass or way to check these? if not I will have to put the mines ecu back in for drag weekend.

Rx,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/458133-boostfuel-cut-6000rpm-rb20det/
Share on other sites

The most likely suspect is TP cut, which is what you are calling AFM air flow cut. There is no way to bypass this without Nistuning the ECU, so you can raise the setting for it in there.

Knock sensor will not do a "cut". It will switch you first to the knock maps then it will go even further and cut ignition timing right back, but it will not actually "cut" the engine.

Speed sensor will do it at 180 km/h on a stock ECU. Assuming that you have the RB20 gearbox sender and drive cable and RB20 compatible speedo head from a Nissan installed, and that the wiring from that speedo head is connected to the ECU, then you could be having this cause a cut. But it won't do it at 6000rpm....it will do it at ~180km/h (depending on diff gearing). And I don't think it likely that you have every link in the chain I described above in a transplant to an RX7.

TP cut as in Throttle position???

Will the speed sensor not wired have the ecu reading different signals? or just one?

As I stated the mines ecu had never gave me this problem. And as far as I know they heighten the rev limit and delete speed cut, anything else? That's why I think it is speedo related.

I have no power steering, no clutch fan, no ac, rb25 turbo, fmic, ffp. fuel pump, 3" exhaust, etc. Pulls hard and was beating an overboosted tuned mr2 last night until boost cut at around 14psi.

TP means Theoretical Pulse. It is the fundamental load index for all maps in a Nissan ECU. It is driven by AFM signal, but it is not just the AFM signal.

The Mines ECU will have had the TP load limit increased along with those other changes.

It will be the TP limit, no alternative.

Okay, Thanks man. Explains a lot!

I've ran that mines ecu for a while and seems to work fairly good, I like the stock with the lower rev limit but I may switch back. Are they as bad as everyone says they are?

I have three ecu's; a mines tuned, stock and a chipped one for 555cc injectors and z32 maf which i do not have.

Thinking of nistune but cant shell the cash now.

Can you tell me anything from my Afr's above? Seems they should not be that lean cruising or rich as i back off the throttle.

Rx,

Mines ECUs are not inherently "bad". The problem is that they have been chipped to suit a particular set-up and cannot be tuned to suit your set-up. Some people say "my car runs great on my Mines ECU" when really all they know is that it starts and runs. If by some chance it does suit your car (and you can only really be sure of that by sticking it on a dyno to make sure AFRs and timing are correct) then you can run it.

Those are my thoughts skyrine, Thinking I'll post them up on ebay unless a member wants one

Timing is the unknown for me, my wideband shows it running rich in boost around 10's with 30psi fuel pressure. keeping the throttle in spot reads 16's with it though.

RX

What STATUS has said is true. There is a lower TP cut point for zero speed conditions, which is why the old Skyline trick of cutting the speed signal wire to beat the 180km/h speed cut problem was not a good solution. You might still hit a normal TP cut even after restoring a speed signal to the ECU anyway. This is because running even the stock turbo at 14 psi with enough other mods (exhaust, cooler, etc) can get you to that point.

Search for posts by me on the topic of the voltages and signal types involved in the speed signal. The speed signal sent from the Skyline dash to the ECU is a square wave 0-5v signal. If you can fake that then you can keep the ECU happy. But I still reckon that Nistune is required.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
    • Slight segway but the most expensive part of the whole thing which I would have thought would only be required for an engine size/type swap, not a VIV test, is emissions testing.  That's when you get into the big bucks.  I can't remember the exact price now but I got quotes for the GT-R based on swapping to RB30 (not that anyone bothers doing it legally anymore...) and it was around $4500 just for that alone.  The guy that does them manipulates the tune on the vehicle to make sure it passes.  The cheaper option is to book into Kangan Batman Tafe (I think that's where it was) and hire their tester.  Allegedly you're not allowed in there with the car though so not in a position to tweak anything to make sure the vehicle passes.  I'm sure in this day and age of ultra tuneable ECU's you could get the tuner to program a special efficiency (clean) tune that emits the lowest amount of particulates possible that would pass the test.  It might only make 50kW's but as long as it passed who cares!
    • I'm sure he has left signs, or, he is looking down, laughing That's my cunning plan for when I leave, lots of half finished projects, with no rhyme or reason of where I was actually up to, just to keep everyone on their toes
×
×
  • Create New...