Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well Dezz the reality is that even slashing their pensions and entitlements etc would make a minuscule difference to the overall books. Not to say I am for it just the reality.

The unions on the other hand butcher and stifle growth through onerous conditions and wage growth expectations (demands) ie train drivers .. What next $200k a year? Gimme a spell.

Edited by alr33x

Cut the fkers, maybe then we'd have politicians who want to be in the job to make a difference and not for the pay packet / pension / expense claims.

It's really hard to buy that a politician is any way in touch with most of the population when they live within the upper 10% of it. I believe they start off with good intentions, but the things they do to get office, the deals they make and the souls they sell change them into power hungry ego tripping cretens.

  • Like 1

You'd have to be pretty stupid to take a paycut to save your employer money when they could just sack you whenever it suited them

Because companies just sack people for fun and no other reason

Anyone truly worried about getting sacked should consider that they are perhaps a dud

  • Like 2

Because companies just sack people for fun and no other reason

Anyone truly worried about getting sacked should consider that they are perhaps a dud

+1 have been involved in the selection of people to sack due to budget cuts. It's the duds which let go first. (Or who the manager doesn't like) #workpolitics

Cut the fkers, maybe then we'd have politicians who want to be in the job to make a difference and not for the pay packet / pension / expense claims.

It's really hard to buy that a politician is any way in touch with most of the population when they live within the upper 10% of it. I believe they start off with good intentions, but the things they do to get office, the deals they make and the souls they sell change them into power hungry ego tripping cretens.

Nail on the head

Cut the fkers, maybe then we'd have politicians who want to be in the job to make a difference and not for the pay packet / pension / expense claims.

It's really hard to buy that a politician is any way in touch with most of the population when they live within the upper 10% of it. I believe they start off with good intentions, but the things they do to get office, the deals they make and the souls they sell change them into power hungry ego tripping cretens.

Yeah but on the flip side a majority of American politicians are extremely wealthy and the system is no better

Not sure what the answer is

Yeah, i get that... royal kingdoms of years past being an example... my point was it will always fail when a nutcase get in... (or the guy thats in becomes a nutcase)

This. But didn't you put a 26 in yours?

The 25 is the superior engine in almost every way save for .1 litre displacement

Not even the throttle bodies and no crossover pipe can save it from that debate

But people want it because GTR engine, even though putting it in a car where the engine is the only thing GTR about it

Nah still have a 2.5 Neo motor

Stock RB26 still be faster than your engine Tony :P

Probably since its not really working at the moment :(

Was curious mainly cause my engine exploded, and I know yours kind of did, and kind of went back, and kind of has issues, so I have a vested interest in your car also working right ;)

Getting flex fuel right though, man... requires mastery and a lot of patience, or a f**k load of money paying a tuner to have a lot of time to spend on it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...