Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As it should be

And greg pls...no car is kicking out at 30km/h in 3rd gear without a clutch dump on shot tyres in the rain!

There's nothing magical in the Jap 2 litre engines, unless very high comp and E85, that's going to make them more responsive or less laggy than a 2.5 with similar top end power. I'm yet to drive one more responsive than my 2.5 that doesn't die in the ass after the mid range cause of its tiny turbo...happy to be shown otherwise...

I was pretty surprised. Car is running 265 Hankook Ventus RS3's too. Really, REALLY had to feather 1st and 2nd to get it to 100, it was really quite eye opening. I thought my car had no grip (to the point of spending big bucks on a aftermarket traction control system.. which rocks)

But yeah. I was like fark damn okay.

I know your car makes.. 275 with change on a RB25 from memory (pretty much entirely from forum stalking), I would be surprised if it actually felt more responsive than the 260KW SR20, but this may have something to do with car weight.

Not saying there's no difference, I mean I noticed the difference from 2.5 to 2.8! But there isn't a LOT by any means.

from what I've heard (and its all second-hand info if you know what I mean), the last motor was bit warped and you're running stock head gasket on a big power/boost 2.8 setup? i know its a metal gasket, but thats a lot of boost. Tony runs factory, but he's got a big-ass turbo with less boost.

there is talk of an underlying issue that hasnt been addressed causing this warping. wont know till its torn apart.

Yeah, the previous engine had a lot of issues presumably by who it was built. Just having HS put it together resulted in basically having the effect of another stroker kit ontop of it. I made the same power with 10 deg less timing and 8psi less boost, with a good 500rpm better response.

Then it let go. ARP Studs specify 90ftlbs and they put 80 on the blueprint, and it lifted/warped. I suspect the issue was always there mainly because I couldn't actually bleed the f**king thing since I got it, but figured "it'll be OK" until I was emptying a radiator every time I gave it a bootful. (driving it normally around was fine)

I used the head gasket they recommended, which was a 1.1m Permaseal one cause wanted 9:1 CR. Spent the money on a Tomei one this time around, and re-bought head studs so I can confirm a million percent what the f**k is in there.

Yeah I don't buy that wheelspin in x gear stuff...it's like people talking about cars wheelspinning/chirping in 4th...unless 11ty kw, it's almost always ling long tyres with awful camber and shitty clutch work.

In a 260rwkw S chassis with 265 Hankooks, having to tread lightly with the throttle in third is not a success of the engine...it's a failure of the suspension/drivetrain/tyre setup IMO. Our race S15 ran 285rwkw on E85 and third held all the way from boost to redline. 2nd almost did it at full throttle on semis.

The S chassis can certainly give the illusion of being quicker and more responsive because it's lighter, but it needs to weigh around 20% lighter than a Skyline to achieve this...and going back to the original discussion about Evos which are often heavier...they feel like ass off boost compared to Skylines (that don't have huge turbos).

I'd put it down to you (I'm assuming here) not having driven a responsive RB25 that still makes decent power for fair comparison to mildly modified 2 litre engines. If you didn't have such a god awful curse following you around I'd invite you to try mine.

hahahahahahaha, you f**king what mate.

Unpopular opinion here sure, but I reckon without a doubt one of the best mods you can do on a RWD car :P

Re: Responsive SR's and such, I was quite surprised as I was just putting around at the time. I did think as mentioned "ah okay, I can see why they drift these things" after being surprised and shitting myself.

The car does actually grip quite well otherwise, though. Just didn't seem to require any more response because any more response is more than the tyres/suspension setup can actually handle, making it literally useless..

A combination of boost threshold and transient throttle response ;)

It is too much power at too low throttle input/speed/rpm for the tyres to handle, so any more of any of that = wheelspin and thus not actually beneficial at imparting forward momentum!

Traction control light coming on and chirping with auto at 130km/h into 3rd ftw :P

No turbo car feels responsive to me now days, but that's what makes them fun IMO

Edited by UNR33L

No turbo car feels responsive to me now days, but that's what makes them fun IMO

agreed.

but a big cam N/A will always feel slow/laggy when theres no forced induction to pick it up in the mid.

Traction control light coming on and chirping with auto at 130km/h into 3rd ftw :P

No turbo car feels responsive to me now days, but that's what makes them fun IMO

Yeah your car is the opposite

Responsive, but after the initial pull from down low that makes you go woah it doesn't feel as fast as it is after that

You running better tyres yet? Should do some gtech runs again

Unpopular opinion here sure, but I reckon without a doubt one of the best mods you can do on a RWD car :P

Re: Responsive SR's and such, I was quite surprised as I was just putting around at the time. I did think as mentioned "ah okay, I can see why they drift these things" after being surprised and shitting myself.

The car does actually grip quite well otherwise, though. Just didn't seem to require any more response because any more response is more than the tyres/suspension setup can actually handle, making it literally useless..

Sounds to me like this SR just wasn't set up properly...

Well given the car pretty well at DECA and long wang on 1st attempt, and... every Silvia driver that's ever got in it has gone "oh shit, this is how I need to go setup my car" I'm gonna wager with nah.

Unless every RB is setup badly in comparison, it really makes me think the whole SR20,4G63 > RB20 thing really just continues to manifest with the RB25/26 using the extra 500/600CC to make up for the shortfall :P

And this in comparison to my (older, laggier!) dyno result which is here -> which most would say constitutes "quite responsive" for a RB

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/uploads/monthly_06_2014/post-63726-0-07556500-1401681661.jpg

Out of curiousity (slow day at work, I plotted his dyno chart vs your dyno chart....both at racepace!...) and made this little excel graph

really not much in it lol, the part that does is him dropping down from 22 to 16psi at the top end.

post-63726-0-42561800-1444867350_thumb.jpg

Yeah your car is the opposite

Responsive, but after the initial pull from down low that makes you go woah it doesn't feel as fast as it is after that

You running better tyres yet? Should do some gtech runs again

Still running Achilles 245s till I can afford some new rims :P

Well given the car pretty well at DECA and long wang on 1st attempt, and... every Silvia driver that's ever got in it has gone "oh shit, this is how I need to go setup my car" I'm gonna wager with nah.

Unless every RB is setup badly in comparison, it really makes me think the whole SR20,4G63 > RB20 thing really just continues to manifest with the RB25/26 using the extra 500/600CC to make up for the shortfall :P

And this in comparison to my (older, laggier!) dyno result which is here -> which most would say constitutes "quite responsive" for a RB

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/uploads/monthly_06_2014/post-63726-0-07556500-1401681661.jpg

whose car at deca?

there only 1 or 2 cars I would take over my set up and both as they 200+ kg lighter.

Out of curiousity (slow day at work, I plotted his dyno chart vs your dyno chart....both at racepace!...) and made this little excel graph

really not much in it lol, the part that does is him dropping down from 22 to 16psi at the top end.

Is that my dyno plot? In depth research lol

My setup is 16psi throughout, with a laggy IWG highflow inside a Nissan comp cover for stealth. The SR, with what sounds like an over-boosted small turbocharger at 22psi...is not really impressing me. It would be a quick car, but put a smaller EWG turbo on mine that doesn't get choked in the top end...it'll move the graph down 500rpm off the spool and make much the same power as both of us up top, albeit not as stealth.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks, I removed the fuse and the relay from the car and made my own circuit with them to test them with a test bulb.  I will look for the wiring diagram and go from there.
    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
×
×
  • Create New...