Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Again not even close to the issue. That's just you projecting your own views onto the situation.

They didn't ban them for women's rights

Hardly

The thing wouldn't exist if Islam wasn't an oppressive religion

My original point was: any leftist objecting to the ban on burkas in Switzerland is effectively, inadvertently standing up for a tool of oppression lol

  • Like 2

You realise that by saying "It's a slippery slope what you allow and don't allow" you are perfectly validating one of the major reasons people say it shouldn't be banned....

And as for hiding a knife in a hijab, that's an absolute nonsense reason... unless you also think we should ban trenchcoats, suit jackets, non skin tight jeans, backpacks, suitcases, sweaters etc etc etc.

There are 100 places to hide a knife on a person, none of which specificly require the clothing of any religion.

As a security guard what would you rather have to search / pat down, jeans or a giant cape?

As a security guard what would you rather have to search / pat down, jeans or a giant cape?

a hijab is not a giant cape.... in any case you then have those crazy things thag buddhists wear, big jew coats, latvian orthodox hats, etc etc etc...

Hardly

The thing wouldn't exist if Islam wasn't an oppressive religion

My original point was: any leftist objecting to the ban on burkas in Switzerland is effectively, inadvertently standing up for a tool of oppression lol

All religions opress their followers, that's basically the point of organised religion... Control via opression.

I agree with you that it's archaic, pointless and opressive, but end of the day it's their choice. If it makes them happy then good luck to em.

None of which completely conceal a person's identity

right... because it's important that we see a terrorists face before he detonates a suucide bomb so we can arrest him afterwards right

All religions opress their followers, that's basically the point of organised religion... Control via opression.

I agree with you that it's archaic, pointless and opressive, but end of the day it's their choice. If it makes them happy then good luck to em.

None to the point that Islam does...it's reputably the worst for gender discrimination

I can assure you that given a choice of which they would practice if forced...most non-Muslims would choose Christianity, Judaism or Hinduism over Islam any day!

None to the point that Islam does...it's reputably the worst for gender discrimination

I can assure you that given a choice of which they would practice if forced...most non-Muslims would choose Christianity, Judaism or Hinduism over Islam any day!

The overwhelming majority of muslims are not like that at all. That's just taking extreme examples and applying it to the whole.

Honestly all Christianity is just as whacky if you try to follow the bible to the word

The overwhelming majority of muslims are not like that at all. That's just taking extreme examples and applying it to the whole.

The irony that you just took a mild example and applied it to the whole

Edited by HEKT1K
  • Like 1

None to the point that Islam does...it's reputably the worst for gender discrimination

I can assure you that given a choice of which they would practice if forced...most non-Muslims would choose Christianity, Judaism or Hinduism over Islam any day!

That's pretty easily attributed to the fact that Murdoch is a Christian...

None to the point that Islam does...it's reputably the worst for gender discrimination

I can assure you that given a choice of which they would practice if forced...most non-Muslims would choose Christianity, Judaism or Hinduism over Islam any day!

just wow

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...