Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if anyone holding TV2 from last year wanted to get out, i think now is the time. Even if the share price improves over the next 6 months, doesnt sound like the company is too organised. I think this was like a desperation announcement to attempt to keep things afloat and restore faith in holders.
Meanwhile 88E... give it a few weeks.


?
18 minutes ago, dezz said:

Share price almost doubled since that post..

I still think TV2 is too risky.

It was only a fortnight ago the company had no income and $700,000 in monthly expenses, with impending voluntary administration. Now all of a sudden they have income from money they were owed and now contracts in the pipeline. Brazil is the next target... what happened to the stuff in Africa not that long ago?

but why are we all here talking about broken laptops and motorbikes?

if we had just pulled our heads in, we could have been part of the million-dollars-by-30 club run by our old mate.

If only we had moved to western suburbs and spoke chinese...

  • Like 1

Mandarin is now the second most spoken language in Australia

Asia has also taken over Europe for migration to Australia

And there was another one...20% of those from Asia immigrated in the last 5 years, I think

So now the statistics have finally caught up with what we all knew years ago lol

1 hour ago, joeyjoejoejuniorshabadoo said:

I actually didn't know that

Now ya know

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

nigga

  • Like 1
Why wouldn't they? If there's money to be made on brokerage fees etc.

Just seems funny requiring a bank to buy currency that does away with banks.
Pretty sure it's all direct deposit, unless buying off someone specifically.

In the 3 minutes of research I did on bitcoin, you need to set up a wallet to trade it... Think most are free or ~$5

My share portfolio is up around 8k this week... Only matters tomorrow though, don't like seeing red for the weekend

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
    • Dort sounds above 3k rpm are dorty 🤣 I might krinkle black the alloy 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...