Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

there are even photo's of him in chesty bonds...

Leesh said he's fat now, like 150kg, and has nothing to do with the Kardashians

Sounds like a worthwhile trade off to me

At haunted hills.

sif do it on highway too wide no challenge for that.

might as well do the kilometer drags we did at 2 nats ago.

where after 2-3 runs everyone was bored and left, where as with the hill climb last one every-one was lined up till the track closed.

edit:

HH

that wzs not ideal...I stuck the gopro over the rear wheel to et a better idea myself:

but prob 1/2 entrants didn't even bother turning up

other than getting a cool shot of your car from the plane it was meh, as soon as the plane landed most packed it in,

At haunted hills.

sif do it on highway too wide no challenge for that.

might as well do the kilometer drags we did at 2 nats ago.

where after 2-3 runs everyone was bored and left, where as with the hill climb last one every-one was lined up till the track closed.

edit:

HH

[/size]

I do not think you know what mountain highway is...

1in20-Copy.jpg

SO much harder when you know you only get a couple of runs at it or in case of a tarmac rally which that would you get one run only.

Commitment v safety bring a very different aspect to it.

but if you that keen to show us

love to see your results for 2016's version of:

http://www.australiantarmacrally.com/about_the_atrc.html

remember you spited closed road cruises are prob 40% of what you need to be running at to do this as a race.

Love to see any of these competitors get up the 7km of mountain highway in less than 3 minutes?

I have no idea what you're getting at. Any road with bends is a challenge when you have a time to beat.

  • Like 1

been there a few times.

much wider and easier than a dedicated hill climb.

guess I just prefer a bit more of a challenge.

There is no greater challenge than avoiding cyclists on Mountain Hwy

  • Like 1

There is no greater challenge than avoiding cyclists on Mountain Hwy

Waiting at the bottom of the hill for a big enough gap to guarantee a good run is a close second...

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...