Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The teclast is similar to that acer. But comes with win 10 pro instead of home, has more ram, 128gb ssd and an all aluminium body.

We have gotten about 6 of them to give out to people at work so far as they are cheap enough that if someone destroys one it's not a big deal while still good enough to get the job done without looking like they are a really cheap laptop.

I thought it had 64gb emmc from my google? At what price point (for everyday consumers) was the 128gb ssd?

The Acer is aluminum too

Edit: found the 128gb for $450 on eBay delivered.

There seems to be trade offs in each case - 10 hours battery versus Acer 15 etc. Buy online versus Aus retailer. With these notebooks the finer details/specs come down to preference or which compromise means the least to you. What shit me when looking is that all the retailers had their ever so slightly different takes on a given model so that they can't be price matched on them.

I thought it had 64gb emmc from my google? At what price point (for everyday consumers) was the 128gb ssd?
The Acer is aluminum too
Edit: found the 128gb for $450 on eBay delivered.
There seems to be trade offs in each case - 10 hours battery versus Acer 15 etc. Buy online versus Aus retailer. With these notebooks the finer details/specs come down to preference or which compromise means the least to you. What shit me when looking is that all the retailers had their ever so slightly different takes on a given model so that they can't be price matched on them.


Yea, I think we are paying about $460 delivered from gearbest. Win10 pro vs home is a deal breaker for business use though and is generally $100 more to get pro.

Follow the announcements not the people shook by em; key words "as expected" repeated about 5 times throughout

My only regret is that I topped up lastweek instead of today

London seems to be reading the announcement a bit more carefully

Follow the announcements not the people shook by em; key words "as expected" repeated about 5 times throughout
My only regret is that I topped up lastweek instead of today
London seems to be reading the announcement a bit more carefully


I did follow the announcement, they are in the middle of the artificial lift and haven't gotten enough frac fluid out for any meaningful data as has been mentioned for over a year. So after it crashed, I bought some more.
19 hours ago, Birds said:

London 3.3 equivalent

Watch us follow them back up tomorrow

Cause we can never lead them anywhere except down

Aussie investors are the worst

Called it; close on 3.3

This is why you don't follow the market...they are just following other people and doing it emotionally. So the quick sell off snowballs into a Chinese whisper of the sky is falling. That's why you buy when people are selling and vice versa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got the gearbox in and the front drive shafts.
    • Hi There I went through a rabbit hole of reading about Xenon headlights and the ADR regulations for having them installed. As people have been defected by running factory xenon I was researching in ways to make them compliant. Everyone always say needs to be self leveling and have washer installed, which I don't necessarily agree with. For this argument I'm using R34 as reference as I'm more aware on the construction of the headlight compared to the R33 Xenon, which may still be the exact same case.   For the self leveling clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles As you can see the bold text "these manually adjustable devices from driver seats" are fine to use. As Series 1 Xenon model headlights do have a 4 level adjuster on the right near the ignition (however not series 2) then these model are consider compliant in that argument.   For the Self Cleaning aspect of this argument clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles Now i can understand the argument that Xenon will need a washer as they are over 2000 lumens, but I clicked on the 12 at the end of that sentence and it takes me to the end notes which states R34 for headlight lenses are plastic, not sure if PL is mark as I don't currently have my skyline to confirm that marking is there. But could you not technically get a lenses with the PL marking on it and then get away with the argument that you need a washer. I went through a quick read of the adr and might have missed something else that may cause them to be non-complaint.    But wouldn't these technically be complaint headlights   Would love to hear other people input on this and shed some light   Edit In regard to the the washer portion I might be mistaken ADR 45 (which I believe is Regulation NO.45) states 12 cd (candela) I dont understand that portion in regarding to calculating the candela if anyone can shed some light. Otherwise I guess throw in a washer for the headlight and you definitely comply.
    • Took it to all Japan day, flogged the hell out of it and took it all, am a very very happy man  don’t know how that ended up in Greg’s thread before
    • Hey Nismo, any chance in the world you still have these seats?
    • I'd say closer to OG GTX3582R, just smaller trim - so 59mm inducer/82mm exducer as opposed to 62/82 for the first gen GTX3582R. Yeah EFRs were boss, the EFR8474 is still an absolute beast and it perplexes me that people still go to things like Turbosmart/Garrett etc when the results people are getting with those are pretty unremarkable compared to what you could get with a turbo available well before those options came out.  DriftSquid (I think) "upgraded" from an EFR9174 to a Turbosmart turbo and promised a comparison video - and kinda shuffled awkwardly and did a bit of diversion from the fact that they didn't get any improvement going to the currently massively hyped brand of turbo from a turbo that was a bit of a frankenstein that had been well superceded in it's own range before the Turbosmart unit he put on there even came out. I suspect the EFR would outperform most Xonas for what a lot of less-insane RB owners would go for, in the 400-600kw range but the Xonas are looking hard to beat up to maybe in the mid 700kw range at this stage- basically where EFRs don't really reach, and before the Precision turbos take over.  What the Xonas do well in the "EFR range" is be easier to package etc, and work very well if a divided housing doesn't suit your application.  
×
×
  • Create New...