Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb27/ Rb28 Vs Staying Rb26


ibrox90
 Share

Recommended Posts

That sounds great, but a 26 with BIG HP and linear sounds like a difficult thing to acheive , like to see the specs and get a look at a Dyno for a reference . Do you have anything to look at ?

It is race car and has had a lot of R&D. I have a graph, but it's not my place to post without permission.

It's Brad Sherriff's, Piggaz knows the car I believe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Original poster looking through the arguing and the bullshit, everyone who has owned or driven both a 2.6 and a stroker has recommended the stroker, even stating they would go bigger if given the chance. A graph has even been posted up showing 2 very closely spec'd cars as a comparison.

Ultimately the choice is yours but this many people can't be wrong

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But its also an air shifted flappy paddle Hollinger, that makes over 600kw on 28psi, runs 35psi on the track and is single turbo.

Pretty sure it's only ever seen 600kw once on the track otherwise it's only on low boost (500kw) and either way doesn't take away from the fact it is a very well engineered engine package.

That sounds great, but a 26 with BIG HP and linear sounds like a difficult thing to acheive , like to see the specs and get a look at a Dyno for a reference . Do you have anything to look at ?

I don't have any dyno sheets sorry. But it uses a precision 6466, 25neo head (for vct), drop in cams and high compression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

XGTRX

Can you just stop commenting ...

Like seriously.It's hard to appreciate a good comment when you vome in calling people retards etc.

Like really. It just doesnt set up a solid enviroment for those interested. Go trawl through ford forums and look at the way people talk to each other.

As soon as you chime in like that no one is listening.

Dont mean to be harsh but its just not positive especially when most are being modest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you are clutching at straws

You've stated yourself that a built 2.6 is only better then a stock one due to outside influences (boost increase) so if the original bolts on were used and the boost left at the same level, there would be no difference in the way the car drove! Meaning my statement was and is 100% accurate

You are stupid or ignorant. Why the hell would you be running the same boost on a forged engine. You have a lighter, stronger and more balanced bottom end capable of running a heap more boost therefore more power and torque. Will it mean it comes on earlier or later, well that depends on the head not the bottom end and a raft of other things depending what your goals are. But the fact you are putting in more boost you probably have upward of 25% more power and torque as soon as boost comes on not including all the reliability benefits, that's everyone forges engines.

So yeah your comment was rubbish.

And as for the 26 to 28 comparison I have never ever said their is no advantage.... Of course there is because the turbos come on earlier, is it significant enough?, well that's up to what people prefer; but to say the bullshit about forged vs stock is laughable, stupid and incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oi champo.

See solid post mate just cut the last and first sentence and your sweet.

....valium?

Your making solid point... just wind your neck in son

Edited by ibrox90
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are stupid or ignorant. Why the hell would you be running the same boost on a forged engine. You have a lighter, stronger and more balanced bottom end capable of running a heap more boost therefore more power and torque. Will it mean it comes on earlier or later, well that depends on the head not the bottom end and a raft of other things depending what your goals are. But the fact you are putting in more boost you probably have upward of 25% more power and torque as soon as boost comes on not including all the reliability benefits, that's everyone forges engines.

So yeah your comment was rubbish.

And as for the 26 to 28 comparison I have never ever said their is no advantage.... Of course there is because the turbos come on earlier, is it significant enough?, well that's up to what people prefer; but to say the bullshit about forged vs stock is laughable, stupid and incorrect.

the fact is I can do what I said on a 2.8 and see a difference but on forged 2.6 it would be exactly the same

Now does anyone leave the boost level where it use to be? No! But at the end of the day my comment is accurate and as I pointed out before and YOU have stated, the only reason the forged 2.6 has any form of increase is due to the supporting mods being changed (boost increase)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oi champo.

See solid post mate just cut the last and first sentence and your sweet.

....valium?

Your making solid point... just wind your neck in son

No they are very relevant because they are incorrect and stupid and not based on fact but rather a delusional opinion.

And you may want to correct yourself, joey called me a retard which again is a baseless opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

E3AD2B9E-D63F-4D1D-A1EA-C2DC0B8B8518_zps

Built 2.6 vs 2.8

Same duration cams

Same fuel

Same dyno and tuner

Same turbo's

Same ECU

Not sure what you'd prefer....

I'll give you a guess which engine is which..

Carry on...

this shows you everything, the 2.8 has stomped the 2.6 into the ground and danced on its grave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No they are very relevant because they are incorrect and stupid and not based on fact but rather a delusional opinion.

And you may want to correct yourself, joey called me a retard which again is a baseless opinion.

Mate seriously you sound like a petulant child.

....but mummy timmy didnt agree with me.....look look everyone hes wrong snd im right.......

Not trying to a be a dick or harsh nor am i as the op trying to rule a thread. But i asked for their opinions and your being unnecessarily offensive.I asked for their opinion and their input. What i havent asked for is your opinion on their opinion.

Just stop mate. Ive said heaps of times make your point without sledging

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the fact is I can do what I said on a 2.8 and see a difference but on forged 2.6 it would be exactly the same

Now does anyone leave the boost level where it use to be? No! But at the end of the day my comment is accurate and as I pointed out before and YOU have stated, the only reason the forged 2.6 has any form of increase is due to the supporting mods being changed (boost increase)

Your delusion continues, go and reread what you wrote like this

'people stay 2.6 for 2 reasons, they are tight asses and don't want to spend an extra $1000 on a rebuild (which means they should never have bought a Gtr in the first place)'

Or this

'Basically if you want to spend a load of cash to have something that's drives exactly the same as it did before leave it as a 2.6'

Your comments are far from accurate on both account.

Who the f**k would build a forged motor and leave standard boost. The whole reason anyone in the world would bother with a built engine is so they can run a heap more boost, what so when you go a stroker you keep your boost the same and don't do any supporting mods etc?

Your comments, in context, was quite clear in that to do a forged 26 setup someone is a tight arse and the car will drive the same and the forged setup will offer no performance benefit. You are inaccurate, wrong, stupid and a smart arse.

Edited by XGTRX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact is it will drive the same, it may make more power up high but down low it will drive exactly the same and make boost at the same time.

The fact the tight arse thing has hit such a nerve says to me YOU have put yourself in that catagory, cause in the same post it also says "or don't realize how good the stroker really is and won't spend the extra money to have one"

There is no point comparing something if it's not like for like, so stock internal 2.6 vs forged 2.6 with the same bolt ons and boost levels will be exactly the same. Fact is like for like the increased capacity engine will walk away every time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I built a 2.6L - do not regret it, Its awesome.

Could it be better - of course but where do you stop?

Talked to someone who ran a built 2.6 for 100,000km before he broke a rod. He then went 2.8L.

He said it is good but is it really that much better? He was unsure about the hype but in the end said it was worth it since it was apart.

Everything else was the same and he was in two minds about the extra $ over the actual benefits.

So if you have the money go for it. All these guys talking about if you cant afford to build a stroker you shouldn't own a GTR can piss right off by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on , Cutty wants some useful info?

Instead of trying to score points give him information that will help.

XGTRX, give us examples of good 26s instead of argueing with anyone with a different opinion, prove your point. Show us your specs and Dyno and let Cutty know how a 26 should be done in your oppinion

As I understand it Cutty wants a road car that he can drive around town or where ever and have a bit of fun when he wants to and as legal as possible.

My 2 cents worth, if you want the car to feel stronger from idle, stroke it and get CCs to help with the weight of these things and get it to spool ASAP. I am sure there are 26s that will do this but you need to know how, you need some info so you can have a better chance of making your mind up and getting what you want.

I think a lot of blokes do not mind a bit of lag because when it comes on, it is a BUZZ !

Now here is a chance for people with 26s that are good street cars to tell Cutty how you did it so he has a chance to see both sides of the coin.

I think you can keep it legal looking with a stroker, you cannot see what is inside an engine. There will be some blokes here that can answer that, just putting ideas out there.

Here are 2 Dynos the 1st was when I changed the cams and turbo on the 26 and it drove much better and I am sure there are ways to make it even better, the 2nd 3.2 stroker , both on 98 pump much better again in MY oppinion

post-52098-0-26747200-1440361753_thumb.jpg

post-52098-0-39195500-1440361834_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I built a 2.6L - do not regret it, Its awesome.

Could it be better - of course but where do you stop?

Talked to someone who ran a built 2.6 for 100,000km before he broke a rod. He then went 2.8L.

He said it is good but is it really that much better? He was unsure about the hype but in the end said it was worth it since it was apart.

Everything else was the same and he was in two minds about the extra $ over the actual benefits.

So if you have the money go for it. All these guys talking about if you cant afford to build a stroker you shouldn't own a GTR can piss right off by the way.

"I built a 26 and it is awesome" sounds great but not helpful

JUST TELL HIM HOW YOU BUILT YOUR CAR, give the bloke some useful information!

He is going to build the motor anyway so the $s would not be a problem either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it is helpful as he was asking that very question.

Its like people just hate the 2.6L as you have to rev it. Well I like to take it out and rev it. Its what I built it for.

If I want a total response machine its the wrong car for me.

Wrong engine, Wrong era.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question back to you is decide what power level you want.

I have been in both a 2.8 and have my forged 2.6 and i have no issues with the 2.6 at all.

Reason? I'm not chasing power. I have no complaints at all with how the 2.6 feels, properly tuned, with -7's. Hell on the street i can't even use the 320kw i had currently. The power delivery was extremely smooth, and the useful power band is fine for my driving style.

When rebuilding i looked into a 2.8, going out in a friends. For my goal on -7's, i decided the money was better spent in other places. And i'm still 100% happy with the decision.

I will say after you start to chase anything above 400kw the 2.8 gets more and more appealing. So again, decide on exactly what power you want first.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it is helpful as he was asking that very question.

Its like people just hate the 2.6L as you have to rev it. Well I like to take it out and rev it. Its what I built it for.

If I want a total response machine its the wrong car for me.

Wrong engine, Wrong era.

I understand what you are saying, I was one of the blokes that bought the wrong car and it was my fault for listening to the bullshit from Phil Lee , instead of doing my homework :spank:

My question back to you is decide what power level you want.

I have been in both a 2.8 and have my forged 2.6 and i have no issues with the 2.6 at all.

Reason? I'm not chasing power. I have no complaints at all with how the 2.6 feels, properly tuned, with -7's. Hell on the street i can't even use the 320kw i had currently. The power delivery was extremely smooth, and the useful power band is fine for my driving style.

When rebuilding i looked into a 2.8, going out in a friends. For my goal on -7's, i decided the money was better spent in other places. And i'm still 100% happy with the decision.

I will say after you start to chase anything above 400kw the 2.8 gets more and more appealing. So again, decide on exactly what power you want first.

It is good to hear some real answers to the original question.

Cutty said he wants response, can a properly built 26 give him the response he is after and boost early. Sorry I have to ask, because I do not know the answers and feel sure he would like to know how to do it.

From the start with my 26, it had more power than I could use, maybe I went into overkill zone with the 3.2 but I have to say, it is a joy to drive. The difference is, I can use the power in lower gears without launching it. It gets going very early in the rev range and goes to the limiter , I aked Jez, he said it is set at 7600rpm. So my car now feels good from idle to 7600, how good is that :wub:

.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what you are saying, I was one of the blokes that bought the wrong car and it was my fault for listening to the bullshit from Phil Lee , instead of doing my homework :spank:

It is good to hear some real answers to the original question.

Cutty said he wants response, can a properly built 26 give him the response he is after and boost early. Sorry I have to ask, because I do not know the answers and feel sure he would like to know how to do it.

From the start with my 26, it had more power than I could use, maybe I went into overkill zone with the 3.2 but I have to say, it is a joy to drive. The difference is, I can use the power in lower gears without launching it. It gets going very early in the rev range and goes to the limiter , I aked Jez, he said it is set at 7600rpm. So my car now feels good from idle to 7600, how good is that :wub:

.

Short answer for response on a 26?

Yes. Yes you can. I have zero issues with response on my R.

But again, i'm running -7's and only 320kw. Not massive power.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There are a few variables here, some are relevant but not critical (IMHO) to help answer your question. The two major things: 1) Ignoring anything to do with forced induction - all engines have their own natural torque curve, and it will ALWAYS roll over higher in the rpm.  There is a fixed relationship between power and torque.  When dealing with kw and nm, the relationship between them is roughly: kw = (rpm * nm) / 9549 nm = (kw / rpm) * 9549 The peak torque of an engine (without boost) will typically climb until somewhere nearish the middle of it's operating rev range, give or take a bit - then start dropping again.   The nearer the minimum and maximum rpm of the engine the steeper that drop off tends to be. 2) Boost simply increases the density of the air going into the engine, which inflates the torque at that point.  The ramp up in the torque curve you see on a turbo engine is due to the boost rising, but it's essentially just multiplying the torque you'd see if it was naturally aspirated.  The roll over you see at the end will typically be what would have always happened with the engine, whether it was naturally aspirated or turbocharged.   If the torque never started dropping then power would climb infinitely. The cool thing about this is you absolutely can tune the power delivery to suit the needs of the owner and/or the limitations of the car, and I regularly do this.    With modern turbos we've got to the point where a setup that someone may run well over 20psi of boost with could actually reach target boost well under 4000rpm if the tuner/owner WANTED to - and a lot of people seem to do this when there is actually no realistic benefit, generally it just adds a massive amount of strain to the engine and drivetrain and often actually makes the car harder to drive. As a general rule I tend to tune the boost curves for cars I tune to reach a "useful" torque level through the rev range and will often end up with a curve that ramps hard to a point, then creeps for the rest of the rev range - not to make the boost curve "soft" as such, but more to make sure its neither laggy nor pointlessly violent in it's delivery.   There have been cars I've tuned to be almost like a centrifugal supercharger (or naturally-aspirated-ish) where they actually only hit like 8psi of boost before opening the gate, then ramp up the next 10psi over the rev range... if the car is "loose enough" to drive. On the flip side I've tuned a car that had stock cams and the engine's natural torque curve fell over HARD in the higher rpm and resulted in a slightly awkward power curve to work with, in that case I actually started ramping up boost to boost torque in a way to offset the engines "NA" torque drop off... at peak rpm actually running a good 5psi+ more boost that what the "flat curve" would have defined.  This gave the owner an extra 500rpm or so of useable rev range, and had a fairly solid impact on times he was running at motorsport events due to being able to hold gears a bit longer and also falling into a more useful part of the rev range in the following gears. Here's an example of an RB in a GTSt I've done the "softened" boost curve to not pointlessly ramp straight to the max boost target early in the rpm, but still made sure it builds useful boost.  If you went in the car you'd not guess at all that the boost curve was doing anything "weird", it feels like it spools immediately and accelerates relentlessly (traction dependent) and holds to max rpm.   I don't know if you'd guess what the boost curve was doing by driving the car, or even looking at the dyno plot... but imho it suits the combination.  
    • therefore on the first examples, as we see, changing cams (graph 2) influences the quantity of torque at high revs its OK for me. so a tuner can act on the wastegate via the boost controller to increase the boost at high revs? on the last example, the boost does not decrease ok, but the torque does. this can come from cams etc etc ok. but on the other curves the boost is not constant, it increases, this is what I find strange to my mind. even more so if it comes from the relief valve. sorry I'm very new don't blame me. in my mind I couldn't imagine how the boost could be higher after the spool  
    • right, but fundamentally, for a given mechanical setup, you are either using all the torque (and therefore power) it will give, or you are choosing to run it less efficiently. Many tuners will have a practice of identifying peak available torque and then winding it back a couple of % for safety, but unless you are working around a very specific issue like a weak gearbox, there is nothing to be gained by making 20 or 30% less than the engine can
    • You can manipulate the torque delivery by ramping in boost gently, then throwing it all in after peak torque to keep the torque flat. It's nothing magical.
    • Tuning the wastegate to do it. That is all. Most people want the boost to not fall off like the most recent example. Those also look like dyno runs with an Auto/Torque converter setup, which does fun things to the graph. The boost tapers down like that because the turbo cannot supply the same amount of air at 7000rpm that it can at 3000 in terms of PSI. That, or the tuner has decided that it tapering off like that is what someone chose to do. IF you have a wastegate that can't bleed enough air to slow the turbine, and IF that turbo can flow enough air to feed the engine at high RPM, you get 'boost creep' which is a rise of boost pressure beyond what you are capable of controlling and/or want. None of these show symptoms of that, but if you had a run that was 20psi at 3000rpm, and 27psi at 7000rpm, it could be an example of that. Or simply that the person wanted boost later for their own reasons... The dyno graphs don't always show the full context.
×
×
  • Create New...