Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb27/ Rb28 Vs Staying Rb26


ibrox90
 Share

Recommended Posts

Might sound dumb and coming from na v8s it may not apply .

Surely it doesnt matter if boost starts at x rpm ... it the engine spins that hard?

I had a ford 5.4 lightened alot of the driveline and underdrove ancillaries.

And that used to just throw revs down. Surely a freely spinning driveline negates lag..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a difference between boost threshold and lag.

I think you are arguing for negation of a low boost threshold on the basis that an engine that can rev could be kept in the rev range where it is making boost. Superficially, that would seem correct, but it is only true for certain usage scenarios. Circuit racers, drag and perhaps rally are the main examples.

In the real world, you will often find yourself in the wrong gear. Simply needing to make a quick lane change in traffic is a good example. A responsive setup that makes boost from lower revs simply has to make more sense in this situation. And in the rest of the real world, no-one wants to be spinning their engine away at 4500 rpm, using heaps more fuel and wearing it out faster if they could be a gear or 2 higher and using 2000 less revs. Drive any car with an instantaneous fuel consumption display and see the difference for yourself, even just holding a constant speed.

Then there is lag. The real, and only true definition of lag is "the delay before boost is produced when opening the throttle at an engine speed wherein the engine would have been making boost if the throttle had already been open and load applied". This is to be taken to mean explicitly what it says. Lag is when you are already above the boos threshold revs but are not yet asking for boost. When you open the throttle, whatever the delay before you get boost, that's lag. The impacts on drivability of this real lag are effectively the complete destruction of normal NA throttle response. When driving through a tight turn and opening the throttle, an NA engine will start to make all the torque it is able to make from the moment you start to open the throttle. A turbo engine will start to make its NA torque, and then boost will arrive and it will start to ramp the torque level up (either a little or a lot, depending on how much boost we're talking about). Read some old Porsche 911 turbo reviews from the late 70s to find out what the consequences of lag used to be!!

People using the term "lag" to describe what the boost threshold of an engine is is just lazy misuse of the term. It is basically equivalent to the horrible GenY/GenZ use of the word "verse" to describe a competition between two entities. Somebody starts using it, and everybody thinks it's correct and uses it too. But it's not. And it sucks.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GTSBoy, understand that I am only asking a question and do not want to change the way my car drives :no: well ?

When I bought my car it was aweful to drive under 5000rpm, does this mean that is how an N/A Skyline would drive or did it drive like that because of how the cams were dialled in for the bigger older T78 Turbo?

Blokes talk about strokers not being able to rev the way they like it, before I built my car I had read that Nitto 3.2 strokers go over 10,000rpm , no problem, well except for wearing the engine out more quickly, maybe dropping bits on the road. :woot:

I reckon with the extra torque I have now, I could put a different turbo on, like a PT7175 or EFR9180 that would still be drivable as a DD with 3.2Lt and the turbo would allow for much more top end power and would also kick in earlier compared to a 2.6Lt.

So if I wanted, I would have a car that would rev the same as a 26, more torque, more HP at the same revs and can drive it as a DD without changing down a gear when you come to a slope.

I have watched MANY vids of 26s on the track and love the way they sound up in the rev range and have only driven mine when it was a 26, no others, so my experience is practically ZERO and from what I have read the 26s can be sensational as a DD :yes:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In general turbo car will never drive like an NA car due to one main difference, the compression ratio. But then you have the diffence in head design, cam specs and exhaust design.

However similar limitations exist when chasing power, as in cam selection, and modifying the above mentioned will all compromise low end torque and will drastically compromise drivability on the street. All things being equal you can have a much better behaved FI car than an NA car with similar power levels.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GTSBoy, understand that I am only asking a question and do not want to change the way my car drives :no: well ?

When I bought my car it was aweful to drive under 5000rpm, does this mean that is how an N/A Skyline would drive or did it drive like that because of how the cams were dialled in for the bigger older T78 Turbo?

A 2.6L NA Skyline, especially a GTR with extra weight on board, would be an uninteresting thing to drive. Worse than a Camry. And that's for a completely normal NA engine. A turbo engine below the boost threshold has to deal with the lower compression ratio (as mentioned by XGTRX above) and the obstruction of the turbo in the inlet and exhaust tracts. There's a lot wrong with turbo engines when they don't have boost.

Logically, the best thing for any turbo engine is simply for it to be bigger. A good big turbo engine will always be better than a good small turbo engine. A classic example is when I converted my R32 from RB20 to a 25Neo. The RB20 is completely lacking in torque output unless it is on boost. The car is just slow before the turbo spins up. The 25Neo, even with only an extra 500cc or 25% of the RB20's capacity, makes a lot more torque when off boost and you can surf around the streets with smaller throttle openings and more urgent response to larger openings even before getting boost out of it. Logically, a 3L version would have to be even better. Logically then, a 3.2L version would be even better again. The only problem with chasing capacity is running up against the physical limits, whether they be mechanical or the breathing capacity of the head.

If I had a 3.2L big engine GTR like you I'd probably be happier to give up 500-1000rpm of boost response in order to obtain massive power - IF I was after massive power. The car would be nice to drive off boost anyway. BUT.....in general for a street car I'd probably not be looking for massive power so I'd probably stick with a more responsive setup so that I can transition from driving nicely off-boost to making enough power to run away from most challengers near on instantly, rather than waiting a bit longer for a stupidly large rush of power.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a simple thing, get cubes add boost.

Ive been in a LS turbo conversion, stock motor, stock compression with a big single conversion and supporting fuel mods, bejeusus, 500+Rwkw on a E85 tune, it had a lot more in it but no forgies to risk it.

And thats still pulling strong from the get go before the turbo even kicks in.

The only let down is the Commonwhore chassis...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is assuming the option is to go for gold in the power field.... Not everyone wants a 500+KW street driven car.

What if you don't want to go for 450+KW, what if you don't want a single?

What if you want 300kw, subtle, street driven machine?

For some circumstances it just isn't required. Like i have stated many times. Everything is relative. What power goals? Cost restrictions on the entire build? Feel of how it drives? Fitment issues (if going 3L), and even legalities (in some states)

Honestly after all the cars i have been in, anything over about the 350kw mark is just making power "because i can" you seriously can't use it on the street. Anyone that says they do is kidding themselves. I had 320KW and it was already overkill. But don't get me wrong, track car is a completely different ballpark. I'm merely commenting on a street basis.

also

Strokers sound shit :nyaanyaa:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a simple thing, get cubes add boost.

Ive been in a LS turbo conversion, stock motor, stock compression with a big single conversion and supporting fuel mods, bejeusus, 500+Rwkw on a E85 tune, it had a lot more in it but no forgies to risk it.

And thats still pulling strong from the get go before the turbo even kicks in.

The only let down is the Commonwhore chassis...

And they still get ripped by a 350kw GTR because in street trim they are slow. I was looking at doing FI on my clubby and went for a drive in a few both SCed anf TCed and realised it was a fkn waste of time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I can really say about these Skylines, is , I have come to luvem! luvem all :wub:

I have seen 2.6s, 2.8s, 3.0s and 3.2s with all sorts of build specs and think they are an amazing car.

Some of the builds I have followed have been sensational, some I am worried that I wont live long enough to see them finished, shit I was getting worried about mine still being in the shop when they were flushing my ashes down the brasco , lol

I think it comes down to this, build your car the way you want, listen to like minded people and learn from their experience, some people might not agree with what you are doing, but that is only their opinion and not worth shit, it is your car ! :yes:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it comes down to this, build your car the way you want, listen to like minded people and learn from their experience, some people might not agree with what you are doing, but that is only their opinion and not worth shit, it is your car ! :yes:

Better still is to drive/experience as many setups as you can and find what YOU like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better still is to drive/experience as many setups as you can and find what YOU like.

Unfortunately easier said than done. Depends sometimes on where you live

I would imagine like many blokes, you buy the car first, sometimes because you like the look of them, believe the propaganda or just a spur of the moment thing, like I did !.

Out of all the cars I have bought, around 25 , this "was" the biggest disappointment and I have had some heaps of shit.

Whos fault, MINE :yes:​ I did not do my homework :no:

But now I am glad I bought it and lucky I used to have money in the bank :wub:

UP THE STROKERS :action-smiley-069:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And they still get ripped by a 350kw GTR because in street trim they are slow. I was looking at doing FI on my clubby and went for a drive in a few both SCed anf TCed and realised it was a fkn waste of time.

Because it couldn't lay the power down?

That seemed to be the only issue in the one i was in, till the owner fitted some ET Streets on it and sorted the suspension and stall converter.

I will comment that he mentioned i was the only one who didn't scare in the car, to me it felt slow too, it didn't impress me.

His drag slips said otherwise.

It was the way it laid the power down, totally different to the way we are use to in a GTR.....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were all autos with hi stalls in them.

What's the point anyway. Bake the tires.... Wow.... Bring a sleeping bag next time

when I said my car previously would not move until 5500 you said a thing of beauty, I was just suggesting that you simulate that thing of beauty by pumping the clutch nothing I would do just suggesting it for you since it sounds like you love lag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You cannot call a car that wont go until you hit 5500 odd rpm , a street car. You cannot legally drive it anywhere on the street or highway and use it in that power range , to keep it going by the time you hit 2nd and ready for 3rd, it is time to hit the brakes ????

Having your neck snapped back when a turbo kicks in is really fun, well at first, but to drive around town in a thing "set up like that" is a nightmare. I KNOW THEY ARE ALL NOT SET UP LIKE THIS. I can only talk about what I have had experience in. As soon as you do something to make it more streetable the power becomes more linear.

I cannot believe your car is like that, you would have to kill yourself after a few weeks of this mental torture of knowing you should have the car in your garage, back of a truck or on the track.

The thing I like about linear power and it does not matter if it is 300kw or 500kw if your car is set up right, you can use it anywhere. You can drive it to the track and be very competitive , or have a street car that can be driven to church or Woolies and then go for a run and get the adrenalin pumping :w00t:

The very best thing about it, I like mine this way :cheers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ibomu hits full boost at 7,000rpm... Is it ideal for the street?

He drives it on the street?

And it's one of the most powerfulest gtr in the country.

Each to there own how they want there car setup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There are a few variables here, some are relevant but not critical (IMHO) to help answer your question. The two major things: 1) Ignoring anything to do with forced induction - all engines have their own natural torque curve, and it will ALWAYS roll over higher in the rpm.  There is a fixed relationship between power and torque.  When dealing with kw and nm, the relationship between them is roughly: kw = (rpm * nm) / 9549 nm = (kw / rpm) * 9549 The peak torque of an engine (without boost) will typically climb until somewhere nearish the middle of it's operating rev range, give or take a bit - then start dropping again.   The nearer the minimum and maximum rpm of the engine the steeper that drop off tends to be. 2) Boost simply increases the density of the air going into the engine, which inflates the torque at that point.  The ramp up in the torque curve you see on a turbo engine is due to the boost rising, but it's essentially just multiplying the torque you'd see if it was naturally aspirated.  The roll over you see at the end will typically be what would have always happened with the engine, whether it was naturally aspirated or turbocharged.   If the torque never started dropping then power would climb infinitely. The cool thing about this is you absolutely can tune the power delivery to suit the needs of the owner and/or the limitations of the car, and I regularly do this.    With modern turbos we've got to the point where a setup that someone may run well over 20psi of boost with could actually reach target boost well under 4000rpm if the tuner/owner WANTED to - and a lot of people seem to do this when there is actually no realistic benefit, generally it just adds a massive amount of strain to the engine and drivetrain and often actually makes the car harder to drive. As a general rule I tend to tune the boost curves for cars I tune to reach a "useful" torque level through the rev range and will often end up with a curve that ramps hard to a point, then creeps for the rest of the rev range - not to make the boost curve "soft" as such, but more to make sure its neither laggy nor pointlessly violent in it's delivery.   There have been cars I've tuned to be almost like a centrifugal supercharger (or naturally-aspirated-ish) where they actually only hit like 8psi of boost before opening the gate, then ramp up the next 10psi over the rev range... if the car is "loose enough" to drive. On the flip side I've tuned a car that had stock cams and the engine's natural torque curve fell over HARD in the higher rpm and resulted in a slightly awkward power curve to work with, in that case I actually started ramping up boost to boost torque in a way to offset the engines "NA" torque drop off... at peak rpm actually running a good 5psi+ more boost that what the "flat curve" would have defined.  This gave the owner an extra 500rpm or so of useable rev range, and had a fairly solid impact on times he was running at motorsport events due to being able to hold gears a bit longer and also falling into a more useful part of the rev range in the following gears. Here's an example of an RB in a GTSt I've done the "softened" boost curve to not pointlessly ramp straight to the max boost target early in the rpm, but still made sure it builds useful boost.  If you went in the car you'd not guess at all that the boost curve was doing anything "weird", it feels like it spools immediately and accelerates relentlessly (traction dependent) and holds to max rpm.   I don't know if you'd guess what the boost curve was doing by driving the car, or even looking at the dyno plot... but imho it suits the combination.  
    • therefore on the first examples, as we see, changing cams (graph 2) influences the quantity of torque at high revs its OK for me. so a tuner can act on the wastegate via the boost controller to increase the boost at high revs? on the last example, the boost does not decrease ok, but the torque does. this can come from cams etc etc ok. but on the other curves the boost is not constant, it increases, this is what I find strange to my mind. even more so if it comes from the relief valve. sorry I'm very new don't blame me. in my mind I couldn't imagine how the boost could be higher after the spool  
    • right, but fundamentally, for a given mechanical setup, you are either using all the torque (and therefore power) it will give, or you are choosing to run it less efficiently. Many tuners will have a practice of identifying peak available torque and then winding it back a couple of % for safety, but unless you are working around a very specific issue like a weak gearbox, there is nothing to be gained by making 20 or 30% less than the engine can
    • You can manipulate the torque delivery by ramping in boost gently, then throwing it all in after peak torque to keep the torque flat. It's nothing magical.
    • Tuning the wastegate to do it. That is all. Most people want the boost to not fall off like the most recent example. Those also look like dyno runs with an Auto/Torque converter setup, which does fun things to the graph. The boost tapers down like that because the turbo cannot supply the same amount of air at 7000rpm that it can at 3000 in terms of PSI. That, or the tuner has decided that it tapering off like that is what someone chose to do. IF you have a wastegate that can't bleed enough air to slow the turbine, and IF that turbo can flow enough air to feed the engine at high RPM, you get 'boost creep' which is a rise of boost pressure beyond what you are capable of controlling and/or want. None of these show symptoms of that, but if you had a run that was 20psi at 3000rpm, and 27psi at 7000rpm, it could be an example of that. Or simply that the person wanted boost later for their own reasons... The dyno graphs don't always show the full context.
×
×
  • Create New...