Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Going 29 would push the pistons over 86.5mm no?, wouldn't this reduce the reliability (thickness of walls)?

I also had a read of nitto's website, they do something interesting with the rod design to make the entire system more reliable, but cant tell if this is true.

86.5 is fine, can even go 87

My 2.9 doesn't actually make it 2.9.. It's still 2.8xx

In saying that even the jap 2.8s are not truly 2.8 .. They're stil 2.7xx

Which one would you choose, there are three?

Step 0 has the most response but lowest rev limit, not sure about 2 or 3.

How can different rotating assembly with the same capacity offer more or less "response"? The turbo(s) only know say 2770 cc worth of air pushing them, not that it has an I beam or H beam rod.

How can different rotating assembly with the same capacity offer more or less "response"? The turbo(s) only know say 2770 cc worth of air pushing them, not that it has an I beam or H beam rod.

Think he's talking about weight

Yes sorry, I think Joey is right.

I was going off what was on their website so didn't clarify.

I see that this post is being ignored by everyone, as it should.

Not everyone :whistling: , some of us are desperate , so maybe if he/she did not want to kiss and definately no tounge, it could be a goer :yes::no::yes::wub:

Do you realize that Cutty has not been on HIS own thread since page 12 , post 221 and only 3 times since page 7.You blokes may have forgotten that he would love to go from 1000 to 9000rpm ASAP ( Yummy me too) and not from 5000 or 6000rpm to 9000rpm, maybe he is my long lost Son :woot:

Cutty has probably killed himself after reading our dumb arse posts, "I like them" as it gets boring if you know shit all about motors, technical shit, etc, Pics are good, so I am going to tell him something if he is still alive and kicking, some home truths as "I" believe them to be.. I find it hard to believe you can get a 26 to be as good as a 28 to a 32 as a DD if you want go from idle.

As a DD/ street car Cutty, you will be happier with a stroker in your Skyline, you say you want response ASAP as a DD , then, the bigger stroker the better to get these heavy low CCs cars going :yes:

To me with the extra CCs they are more linear and I believe safer on the road than a peaky R that kicks in hard. As you apply the thottle you can feel the car react more smoothly on corners and at least 1 or 2 gears higher. I do have an excellent drive line to help put the power down, no spinning wheels, just goes :yes:

I have no problem with other blokes preferences to how they want their cars to go , hope it works for them, but response is sort of like a swear word with "some" blokes on SAU, the only words I can think of to use instead of response is , Zoom , jump, leap, and fast! but 5 letters, quick, swift, rapid, brisk, hasty, nippy,smart, fleet, zzzzzzzzzzz whoops dozed off, time to top up :yes:

The only mod difference with the Dynos were , the cams went from 260 9.15 Poncam B to 260 10.8 ,, 6boost , 4" dump( same 3.5" exhaust) and of course the 3.2 stroker. When the 26 was first tuned with the new mods there were NO problems with the 3" dump.

But the 3.2 @ 437kw is 92 kw more @22psi than the 26s 345kw @24psi , that is a lot on 98 pump .

By the way , my daughters sleeping over tonight, so the old bloke has been out to play, hic hic :special:

post-52098-0-31721300-1441341865_thumb.jpg

post-52098-0-49164100-1441341886_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
×
×
  • Create New...