Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Going 29 would push the pistons over 86.5mm no?, wouldn't this reduce the reliability (thickness of walls)?

I also had a read of nitto's website, they do something interesting with the rod design to make the entire system more reliable, but cant tell if this is true.

86.5 is fine, can even go 87

My 2.9 doesn't actually make it 2.9.. It's still 2.8xx

In saying that even the jap 2.8s are not truly 2.8 .. They're stil 2.7xx

Which one would you choose, there are three?

Step 0 has the most response but lowest rev limit, not sure about 2 or 3.

How can different rotating assembly with the same capacity offer more or less "response"? The turbo(s) only know say 2770 cc worth of air pushing them, not that it has an I beam or H beam rod.

How can different rotating assembly with the same capacity offer more or less "response"? The turbo(s) only know say 2770 cc worth of air pushing them, not that it has an I beam or H beam rod.

Think he's talking about weight

Yes sorry, I think Joey is right.

I was going off what was on their website so didn't clarify.

I see that this post is being ignored by everyone, as it should.

Not everyone :whistling: , some of us are desperate , so maybe if he/she did not want to kiss and definately no tounge, it could be a goer :yes::no::yes::wub:

Do you realize that Cutty has not been on HIS own thread since page 12 , post 221 and only 3 times since page 7.You blokes may have forgotten that he would love to go from 1000 to 9000rpm ASAP ( Yummy me too) and not from 5000 or 6000rpm to 9000rpm, maybe he is my long lost Son :woot:

Cutty has probably killed himself after reading our dumb arse posts, "I like them" as it gets boring if you know shit all about motors, technical shit, etc, Pics are good, so I am going to tell him something if he is still alive and kicking, some home truths as "I" believe them to be.. I find it hard to believe you can get a 26 to be as good as a 28 to a 32 as a DD if you want go from idle.

As a DD/ street car Cutty, you will be happier with a stroker in your Skyline, you say you want response ASAP as a DD , then, the bigger stroker the better to get these heavy low CCs cars going :yes:

To me with the extra CCs they are more linear and I believe safer on the road than a peaky R that kicks in hard. As you apply the thottle you can feel the car react more smoothly on corners and at least 1 or 2 gears higher. I do have an excellent drive line to help put the power down, no spinning wheels, just goes :yes:

I have no problem with other blokes preferences to how they want their cars to go , hope it works for them, but response is sort of like a swear word with "some" blokes on SAU, the only words I can think of to use instead of response is , Zoom , jump, leap, and fast! but 5 letters, quick, swift, rapid, brisk, hasty, nippy,smart, fleet, zzzzzzzzzzz whoops dozed off, time to top up :yes:

The only mod difference with the Dynos were , the cams went from 260 9.15 Poncam B to 260 10.8 ,, 6boost , 4" dump( same 3.5" exhaust) and of course the 3.2 stroker. When the 26 was first tuned with the new mods there were NO problems with the 3" dump.

But the 3.2 @ 437kw is 92 kw more @22psi than the 26s 345kw @24psi , that is a lot on 98 pump .

By the way , my daughters sleeping over tonight, so the old bloke has been out to play, hic hic :special:

post-52098-0-31721300-1441341865_thumb.jpg

post-52098-0-49164100-1441341886_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From the pictures I have when doing the job the flywheel is the same diameter, I don't think they're playing weird tricks like putting weights at the outer diameter to increase flywheel inertia or anything like that. The OEM flywheel is definitely heavier, but it's not a huge difference. Quoted weight savings of the clutch is 2 kg so I can't imagine the flywheel being lighter than ~7 kg. Kind of regret not weighing it before the clutch went into the car but as far as driveability goes I have no complaints.
    • HKS trigger kit should be very easy to integrate with a Link. It's a 36-2 crank trigger. Hard part is finding the motivation to take off the timing belt and everything on the front of the engine to install it. You also need to cut out a hole in the oil pump housing so the sensor can read the trigger wheel. Changing out the cam sensor for a 24 tooth setup is probably good enough but as others have mentioned depending on what underlying assumptions are changed it becomes more of a problem. Reading the crank state off of the cam is an abstraction that works in the general case, but if you have an edge case it makes less and less sense. There is a GTX2860 gen 2 that can take a compact 5 bolt housing so it's direct bolt on but I'm not 100% sure of what's involved. Peak compressor efficiency drops off a bit on these turbos vs -5s, 77% vs 73% but you get way, way wider region of operation. The -5s have a really strange surge line in their compressor map that is all over the place. If you think the hot side on the -5s aren't open enough you can try the Tomei T550B turbos which a local tuner seems to be happy with:
    • i need a complete tail light for my R33 GTR if you have please let me know.
    • I need a great maintenance workshop around Idaho, if you know one please let me know..
    • Hello friends, i have a good friend in Canada that looking for a good condition 1993 GTR around him please if one or know someone around you that is willing to let it go please let me know so that i can inform him.....Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...