Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

How are people locking off their ignition advance to set base timing? I've got an inductive pickup timing light with the pickup clipped around the white wire loop at the start of the coil harness (it's at the back near the firewall), but the ECU is constantly varying the timing and it's very difficult to read. How have other people locked it at 15 degrees?

I have tried Conzult's "idle setting" but that doesn't tell me what the timing is set to, and it doesn't seem to be constant. It just seems to adjust the idle speed.

Cheers

DaveB

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/459187-setting-timing-on-25det-neo/
Share on other sites

And check the sticker on you bonnet to see what it should be set at. I believe auto and manual base timing is different. And yes unplug TPS and use an old spark plug lead between cyl 1 coilpack and plug.

Well I tried timing from various points and comparing them to the #1 spark plug using an HT-driven timing light, and I can now say for sure that timing off the loop wires shows about 15 degrees more advance than using the #1 spark plug method. I took some pictures if people are interested but I hope this is enough.

Some weirdness I noticed, has anybody ever seen this? With TPS unplugged (thanks owen1r) I loosened all 3 bolts on the CAS sensor, and then rotated until I observed the same timing with the light that the ECU was commanding (in this case 12 degrees). That was fine. But then I would notice that as soon as I tightened just one of the bolts to even finger tight, the timing would change back to like 5 degrees?! The CAS was definitely not rotating, and it would have to rotate a significant amount to make that much difference to the timing. Does anybody know what could be going on there? This is my second CAS too since I replaced it a while ago.

thanks

David

Lots of timing lights (generally the less expensive ones) read double the actual timing from the loop at the back, so if you are seeing 30o you can probably read that as 15o

Interesting to know thanks Duncan. Do you have any suggestion for why it might be changing when I tighten the CAS? I'm a bit worried that the CAS is reading UNDER, and therefore I might have more timing than there should be.

Edited by DaveB

Lots of timing lights (generally the less expensive ones) read double the actual timing from the loop at the back, so if you are seeing 30o you can probably read that as 15o

I don't think it's that simple and I wouldn't like to just guess.

If the gun is picking up the leading edge of the current in the loop wire, the amount of dwell is added to the timing reading. It might look like double, bit that's basically just a fluke. It should really pick up on the falling edge of the loop wire to be accurate.

I would still not trust it, a plug lead between coil and plug is best option.

  • Like 1

I don't think it's that simple and I wouldn't like to just guess.

If the gun is picking up the leading edge of the current in the loop wire, the amount of dwell is added to the timing reading. It might look like double, bit that's basically just a fluke. It should really pick up on the falling edge of the loop wire to be accurate.

I would still not trust it, a plug lead between coil and plug is best option.

I compared both and I couldn't find any correlation.

With the inductive pickup timing light, off this wire:

post-32445-0-35934300-1440639860_thumb.jpg

...I measured about 22 degrees:

post-32445-0-69599100-1440639878_thumb.png

But with an older style timing light, that connects directly to the spark plug (it has a long spring which fitted into the coilpack), it read about 5 degrees!

  • Like 1

Do some maths. I'm sure it would be able to be calculated back to the dwell of the coil.

I seriously can't be bothered looking I to it further!

It's enough to know to not trust/use the loop, especially without checking it to a lead.

Do some maths. I'm sure it would be able to be calculated back to the dwell of the coil.

I seriously can't be bothered looking I to it further!

It's enough to know to not trust/use the loop, especially without checking it to a lead.

Sure. What I meant to say was, it doesn't look easy like 2 x the spark-measured value or something similar.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 馃槩 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
  • Create New...