Jump to content
SAU Community

How To Reset Pit Warning On Dash For Nissan Cima 2001


Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

I have a Nissan Cima 2001 and its showing on the screen (PIT SERVICE WARNING WITH A GREEN WRENCH) I have no idea how to remove this as I don't speak or rear Japanese.

Is anyone out there that could guide or show me how to remove this warning from my screen??

Reading from other forums it appears to be related to oil or service(due or coming up). I do my own oil changes and other maintenance. Just need someone to show me how to get rid of this issue

Much appreciate

you in Victoria?

firstly: theres a forum for these kinds of cars - http://www.zeitakuvip.com/forum/

secondly: theres a 4-door jap car section on SAU http://www.sau.com.au/forums/forum/83-cefiros-and-4-door-sedanstaxis/

Lastly... it does sound like a service warning. Mine went away after a few drives of stopping the bitch from talking. Playing around with a few of the buttons (figuring out what they did) I found a page where I could reset the trip meters. Scrolled down to each meter and pressed "enter" and it cleared them. problem solved.

Hey Lee,

To be honest I want to sell the car and buy another. I imported the car back in July this year through J-Spec. The car came as described by Ben. Grade 4.0, no accident history or trouble. It has 82.000km, all leather, all options included. The car is fantastic, but my wife wants Toyota rather than Nissan.

So if you know anybody that would want one let me know.. just want to recover my cost so $11.000

I can send photos direct

Thanks Lee

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...