Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've read of cracking issues with these rotors, but has anyone else had the rotor completely separate from the hub with their DBA4000 T3 rotors?

I was punting it down the main straight at Winton on the weekend, put my foot on the brakes at around 180kmh, then bang! Straight off into the grass because I wasn't able to stop.

post-23053-0-74102400-1442208689_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

That is an impressive way to end a rotor.

I assume there was not horrible thrumming immediately before it happened? I note DBA advertise their 4000 series as "Road and Race" so I am sure they won't try and avoid responsibility if it was their issue.

You need to get that rotor in front of a DBA failure/claims engineer ASAP.

I was planning on turning it into a clock since the centre has been pretty nicely sheared away, but getting it front of DBA may be a better idea.

That is an impressive way to end a rotor.

I assume there was not horrible thrumming immediately before it happened? I note DBA advertise their 4000 series as "Road and Race" so I am sure they won't try and avoid responsibility if it was their issue.

There was no noticeable noise as I was coming hot down the straight, put my foot down and it pretty much got destroyed straight away. It happened after doing two warm up laps where I tried to avoid using the brakes too much so I could keep the brakes warm, but not hot.

Holy crap, very lucky indeed not to crash bad!!

I'm running the same discs, makes me nervous, very keen to hear more:

  • Age of discs
  • # of track days
  • Disc thickness
  • Pad and fluid type
  • Wheel type
  • Any brake cooling
  • Any early signs of potential failure

Interested in hearing what DBA have to say, too!

You need to get that rotor in front of a DBA failure/claims engineer ASAP.

Unfortunately DBA (and RDA) wont cover them, only warrantied under normal street use, the moment you hit track any warranty you had is out the window.

Quite a common thing to happen when shocked into heat, they crack from the rapid heat expansion, cast iron needs to be warmed up gradually to avoid cracking it.

You can actually see its riddled with cracks all the way around from rapid heating......

Easily identified by the radiating lines outwards from the hub center all the way around.

When hitting a track, you should use the first lap to build heat into the brakes, that way they are reasonably warm when you start your flying lap, then the differences in temp change are far less and the rotor expands less from running hard cold and running hard hot.

Take a off the shelf rotor from stone cold and hit the straight with a high enough temp rating pad, slam on the brakes with everything you have and bingo, great chance of getting a cracked rotor.

Edited by GTRPSI
  • Like 1

Unfortunately DBA (and RDA) wont cover them, only warrantied under normal street use, the moment you hit track any warranty you had is out the window.

I wasn't actually suggesting that he make a claim. My intention was that DBA could look at the failure and see if there was anything they could learn from it. Sometimes there are hidden manufacturing faults (basically just casting defects) that will survive years of use on a road car that will break on track usage, exactly as you say. They never learn from the ones that don't break on the street, but they should be given every opportunity to see the ones that do.

An old example is the habit of Holden 6s to break timing gears and occasionally snap the front end off the camshaft. I reckon that Holden learnt something about castings because it eventually stopped happening.

  • Like 1

Holy crap, very lucky indeed not to crash bad!!

I'm running the same discs, makes me nervous, very keen to hear more:

  • Age of discs
  • # of track days
  • Disc thickness
  • Pad and fluid type
  • Wheel type
  • Any brake cooling
  • Any early signs of potential failure

Interested in hearing what DBA have to say, too!

Rotors were around 2 years old and have done about 6 track days and around 2000km of street driving. The rotors actually have very minimal wear, but started to get hairline cracks which is pretty common for tracked rotors.

Using Project Mu HC+ pads with ATE Super Blue fluid and semi slicks.

Unfortunately DBA (and RDA) wont cover them, only warrantied under normal street use, the moment you hit track any warranty you had is out the window.

Quite a common thing to happen when shocked into heat, they crack from the rapid heat expansion, cast iron needs to be warmed up gradually to avoid cracking it.

You can actually see its riddled with cracks all the way around from rapid heating......

Easily identified by the radiating lines outwards from the hub center all the way around.

When hitting a track, you should use the first lap to build heat into the brakes, that way they are reasonably warm when you start your flying lap, then the differences in temp change are far less and the rotor expands less from running hard cold and running hard hot.

Take a off the shelf rotor from stone cold and hit the straight with a high enough temp rating pad, slam on the brakes with everything you have and bingo, great chance of getting a cracked rotor.

I did two warm up laps at around 60% of normal pace, then 80%, so they would have been pretty warm by the time I hit the brakes.

Not really confident that DBA will get back to me with any sort of resolution in my favour, but I've written the rotors off and will go for something else in the future. The 4000 series are too expensive to run for such a short time. I'd rather go for a cheaper RDA and swap them out more often after they start to get hairline cracks.

  • Like 2

I wasn't actually suggesting that he make a claim. My intention was that DBA could look at the failure and see if there was anything they could learn from it. Sometimes there are hidden manufacturing faults (basically just casting defects) that will survive years of use on a road car that will break on track usage, exactly as you say. They never learn from the ones that don't break on the street, but they should be given every opportunity to see the ones that do.

An old example is the habit of Holden 6s to break timing gears and occasionally snap the front end off the camshaft. I reckon that Holden learnt something about castings because it eventually stopped happening.

Unfortunately most of their rotors are cast in China to keep cost down through a number of plants, part numbers come from different casters, not just 1 plant.

They warranty them for street use, knowing they will work safely within those parameters, they have been proven to be well made in that environment.

If customers want to take things to the next level DBA have a range of proper 2 piece track rotors designed to take that abuse, now if they cracked, id suggest taking them in for research and development and to see what they would say and if they could improve the product.

I doubt they will look to improve whats currently a price point product, that currently works well for what its designed to take, ATM the brake rotor game is extremely competitive in pricing, both RDA and DBA both have a good performance street range which works well while holding prices down to keep customers happy.

Just like you wouldn't build a highly strung engine with stock rod bolts and then take the broken rod bolts to the engine manufacturer to show them what happens when you push a part beyond its recommended usage, im sure the engineer looking at it could have told you it would have happened before you did it.

Rotors were around 2 years old and have done about 6 track days and around 2000km of street driving. The rotors actually have very minimal wear, but started to get hairline cracks which is pretty common for tracked rotors.

Using Project Mu HC+ pads with ATE Super Blue fluid and semi slicks.

I did two warm up laps at around 60% of normal pace, then 80%, so they would have been pretty warm by the time I hit the brakes.

Not really confident that DBA will get back to me with any sort of resolution in my favour, but I've written the rotors off and will go for something else in the future. The 4000 series are too expensive to run for such a short time. I'd rather go for a cheaper RDA and swap them out more often after they start to get hairline cracks.

Those earlier hair line cracks you had are usually just surface deep.

We see a lot of track day rotors like this, quite often a fine marbling of the braking surface where the cracks are very shallow, a simple light skim will remove them.

However, not machining the rotors (you mention 6 track days) "may" (something ive always suspected in the early days and after watching had seen) lead to these cracks growing, or lead to a larger full crack developing due to the weakness from the earlier cracks.

Just like how once a part is cracked, the crack will continue to grow along the current one.

Most rotors with the surface marbling that ive watched, progressively got worse with the cracks growing in width and depth the longer they were used, the rotor heating and cooling (expanding and contracting) aggravating the issue.

Its one of the reasons i now tell people doing track days to keep an eye on 1 piece rotors for any cracks developing, if they see a surface craze finish to simply lightly machine the rotors to remove it before driving on them.

You can never be too safe, then again, using the right rotor in the first place may have been more appropriate however the costs of the good stuff is pretty much out of range of the average person doing the odd track day.

You mentioned you used HC pads, what is the temp rating of the pads? I know the HC800 are rated to 800 degrees.

I piece rotors shouldn't be subjected to over 600 reliably, once you go over that your looking for issues.

Edited by GTRPSI

Unfortunately most of their rotors are cast in China to keep cost down through a number of plants, part numbers come from different casters, not just 1 plant.

They warranty them for street use, knowing they will work safely within those parameters, they have been proven to be well made in that environment.

If customers want to take things to the next level DBA have a range of proper 2 piece track rotors designed to take that abuse, now if they cracked, id suggest taking them in for research and development and to see what they would say and if they could improve the product.

I doubt they will look to improve whats currently a price point product, that currently works well for what its designed to take, ATM the brake rotor game is extremely competitive in pricing, both RDA and DBA both have a good performance street range which works well while holding prices down to keep customers happy.

Just like you wouldn't build a highly strung engine with stock rod bolts and then take the broken rod bolts to the engine manufacturer to show them what happens when you push a part beyond its recommended usage, im sure the engineer looking at it could have told you it would have happened before you did it.

That's rediculous. 4000 t3 are sold as road AND TRACK. So to say they were only made for the road and they work well in that environment is bullshit. Why do they market them for the track if they aren't up to the task?

Your defensive posts have so many flaws. How hard would it have been to say 'sorry about your misfortune send the rotor to myself or dba and we will check the rotor for flaws etc. thankfully you weren't seriously injured'

Unfortunately most of their rotors are cast in China to keep cost down through a number of plants, part numbers come from different casters, not just 1 plant.

They warranty them for street use, knowing they will work safely within those parameters, they have been proven to be well made in that environment.

If customers want to take things to the next level DBA have a range of proper 2 piece track rotors designed to take that abuse, now if they cracked, id suggest taking them in for research and development and to see what they would say and if they could improve the product.

I doubt they will look to improve whats currently a price point product, that currently works well for what its designed to take, ATM the brake rotor game is extremely competitive in pricing, both RDA and DBA both have a good performance street range which works well while holding prices down to keep customers happy.

Just like you wouldn't build a highly strung engine with stock rod bolts and then take the broken rod bolts to the engine manufacturer to show them what happens when you push a part beyond its recommended usage, im sure the engineer looking at it could have told you it would have happened before you did it.

To the two points I've highlighted in red;

I did a factory tour last year with Members of SAU NSW for one of our most excellent Tech Arvo's organised by the Club Execs.

1; According to DBA; ALL 4000 Series and 5000 Series are cast in a proprietary grade of cast iron in a foundry based in Sydney. This is to guarantee the quality & consistency of their flagship product.

2; In the standard R33 GTS-t rotor size; there is no DBA 2 piece rotor available, so you are left with the 1 piece 4000 series T3 slotted rotor OP has quite reasonably decided to use for trackwork on what I'd assume is a modified STREET CAR, not a dedicated track car.

6 track days and 2000km of street use doesn't "seem" like a great deal of time, and the nature of the failure isn't something that you'd expect; and even DBA suggest that an amount of radial surface cracking in tracked rotors is perfectly normal, and to be expected (as you have also pointed out).

I'd definitely be approaching DBA, and asking for their guidance, and possible ways to move forward; they are (in my experience) excellent to deal with, and are very understanding of enthusiasts who use their product as it was designed.

Simply telling people that they have misused the product and that they should suck eggs is hardly helpful.

Cheers, Dale.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
  • Create New...