Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I've been advised to put an engine damper on my RB26 (R32 GT-R). I'd like to know if any of you have had experiences with an engine damper and what it did for you and an estimate in costs would be great too as I have no idea about them.

Thanks in advance for any help. Much appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45971-help-what-is-an-engine-damper/
Share on other sites

Why was it suggested?

An engine damper is like a little shock absorber that goes between the engine and the shock tower to reduce the engine rocking when you get on and off the power.

Good from drifting so the engine doesn't out your balance off as much.

it was used to reduce the virbration of the engine and the movement due to cornering. don't think it is a nessary for RB. but after "downgrade" from 6 to 4 cylinder car, it shake like hell in high rev... i am going to get one very soon.

Thanks for the info guys.

rs73 yes that's it.

It's said that I will get better response from it and yes it will reduce stress on my engine mounts.

HMM. I am wondering whether I really need it or not now. It's not too expensive in any case I suppose. I might try it.

its not as nessessary on inline sixes due to the natural harmony of the crank they dont vibrate as much!!!!

Don't think we really need it for normal street and circuit driving.

However might be needed for hard drifting, not because of engine vibration, but to prevent engine rocking from side to side when throwing your car sideways around a series of tight corners... So if u drift hard, then might worth consider it, otherwise put the money into something else...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • H2 (for cars) will never happen. It's not reasonable for any number of reasons. It's also not reasonable for almost all of the industrial uses that the fanbois say that it will be used for, again for a large number of reasons. There are some cases where it will be good. But, even those will be massively hampered by the economics. The only way that H2 can be economic is if we somehow manage to get from where we are to the other side of the economic-valley-of-death in which no-one can operate. You need there to be sufficient renewable generated electricity to be available so that it is effectively free. Once you are there, you can do whatever the hell you want and hang the efficiency. But until you get there, the ever diminishing value of electricity makes it harder and harder to encourage businesses to build the new generation capacity, and they will simply stop investing in generation projects. (I kinda think there needs to be just government money spent on building the required capacity in a non-commercial way, similar to how the first fossil fueled grids were built, as national-government owned utilities. And probably some nuclear in there to start. But this all should have started 10-15 years ago to avoid the chasm of death that we face right now). Synth fuels will be much more likely, but will only occur is there is at least some renewable H2 production, because you need H2 to do it. And you need stacks of free (or at least extraordinarily cheap) energy because assembling molecules back into fuels is exactly the opposite process to burning the fuel, and the reason we burn fuels is because there is so much energy squeezed into each molecule. So you're somewhat subject to the same economic valley of death problem as above anyway. That is unless people are willing to pay the current equivalent of $5 or $6 per litre of petrol-ish liquid fuels. Can you imagine it? The squealing at $2 now is bad enough.
    • This is so cool. Get a dashcam that records audio and hopefully you'll catch it.  Maybe there's a brand or some kind of markings on the back ? Are the pics hand drawn? I love it so much.
    • Hahaha yep, point(s) taken. I just like seeing different things and an EV in an R32 is pretty different. I'm not on the EV band wagon, I'm waiting for synthetic fuels or hydrogen personally. 
    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. The shock dyno actually looks pretty similar to Shockworks (from what I can surmise from a screenshot of a youtube video - and my dyno printout...) Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I've probably also altered toe and camber in a negative (detrimental) way. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
×
×
  • Create New...