Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm having some annoying problems and I'm weeding them out one by one. I got a new set of wheels for my car in 18x9 +15. They will sit on my 33 gts-t. I've got the fronts wrapped with 225/40/18 tyres and after installation I had issues with the tyres scrubbing that metal part of the body which protrudes quite a fair bit, the seam which joins the panels together(there are pics in this thread). So I did the only reasonable thing I could think of and bash the shit out of them until they were flat. I still have some scrubbing contact when throwing the weight of the car around, even lightly. My main concern was the edges cutting the tyre but now they're folded back so my main concern is why they touch on the left and not the right.

This leads me to the second concern. It APPEARS that my driver side wheel sits too far back in the wheel well. Pics attached. Opinions? I've found quite a shitload of play in the whole hub assembly too, please refer to the video. I am confident this is due to the camber arms I just installed. Everything is tight and again only evident on the RHS of the car. The RHS of the car has never been hit but prior to me owning the car the front left took a beating and it was repaired(over gutter, panel damage, some arms were replaced, it was repairable). The thing is the left feels much more solid than the right. Could adjustable castor arms incorrectly set cause any issues like this? There appears no damage to the crossmember.

Anybody able to shed some light? I really doubt I am the only skyline driver with this wheel configuration at the front. Its quite standard and not that large at all. My car sits 115mm at the lowest point on HSD coilovers.

Any feedback on anything would be good(the play, the wheel touching, wheel being too far back).

post-68383-0-71562600-1443260484_thumb.jpg

post-68383-0-45641000-1443260557_thumb.jpg

post-68383-0-14850200-1443260635_thumb.jpg

I'm uploading the video to youtube at the moment. The video shows play in assembly.

https://youtu.be/0vbFKOsTkEg

Here's a pic from my last alignment report.

post-68383-0-81668900-1443261229_thumb.jpg

Edited by SargeRX8
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/459974-suspension-and-wheel-issue/
Share on other sites

It's not your wheels.

Reckon RHS has taken the hit as well, think you'll find the control arm bent backwards a bit. Would also explain the movement in the hub assembly, may have elongated the hole for the kingpin.

Look at replacing the lower control arm, but you may have bent or elongated the holes in the crossmember and you may need to repair/replace that. And the upright may also be damaged.

As for the alignment, add some more castor. Id add some more camber too.

It's not your wheels.

Reckon RHS has taken the hit as well, think you'll find the control arm bent backwards a bit. Would also explain the movement in the hub assembly, may have elongated the hole for the kingpin.

Look at replacing the lower control arm, but you may have bent or elongated the holes in the crossmember and you may need to repair/replace that. And the upright may also be damaged.

As for the alignment, add some more castor. Id add some more camber too.

Can I loosen bolts to check for excess play in the components and parts you specified? What do you mean by the upright? Is that the actual strut tower? It would be a mission for me to try straighten all this up. I hope tomorrow isn't raining, I get one day off a week and would really like to get under it and start doing some measurements. I installed adjustable camber arms to reduce camber, I think I'll plug the factory ones back in then, see if it eliminates play and also add the camber back and see if the wheels tuck in a little better. To add castor, do you shorten or extend the length of the castor rod?

It appears you have fitted rims to a cow..... More pictures of cow

post-68383-0-36695000-1443277362_thumb.jpg

The other problem people cause when severely kerbing/median stripping a Skyline is the front crossmember can get relocated. Slotted holes like mentioned above.

Would a damaged and crossmember give other symptoms such as vibration in the driving train? I don't think there is any vibration, but I would assume there may be some if the engine is sitting a degree out. If I loosen the bolts which hold the whole thing in place is there wiggle room for me to adjust or am I in need of a new subframe. This sounds like a huge job :(

Can I loosen bolts to check for excess play in the components and parts you specified? What do you mean by the upright? Is that the actual strut tower? It would be a mission for me to try straighten all this up. I hope tomorrow isn't raining, I get one day off a week and would really like to get under it and start doing some measurements. I installed adjustable camber arms to reduce camber, I think I'll plug the factory ones back in then, see if it eliminates play and also add the camber back and see if the wheels tuck in a little better. To add castor, do you shorten or extend the length of the castor rod?

attachicon.gif10807937_10152901512312526_1307886894_n.jpg

Would a damaged and crossmember give other symptoms such as vibration in the driving train? I don't think there is any vibration, but I would assume there may be some if the engine is sitting a degree out. If I loosen the bolts which hold the whole thing in place is there wiggle room for me to adjust or am I in need of a new subframe. This sounds like a huge job :(

I'll try to answer most of the above even though the earlier parts are not directed at my post.

First, the control arm that the 31 pig reckons you have probably bent is the lower CR, not the upper. So don't play with the camber arms you have installed hoping to work that one out. The only real way to check is to get the arm off and compare it to a known straight one, unless it is so badly rooted that you can see creases in it.

The upright is not the strut tower. The upright is the piece that runs (more or less)) vertically from the lower balljoint up to the upper bearing where the upper control arm attaches at the outer end. It's effectively the hub. Look at an exploded diagram of the Skyline suspension to get a better idea how it all goes together.

To add caster you shorten the rods. Pulls the outer end of the lower control arm forwards. Be aware that you cannot do this shit by eye. If stuff is bent, then you might end up with 2° of caster on one side and 12° on the other in order to get the wheels looking evenly located in the arches.

As to the bent/relocated front subframe causing driveline vibration....I wouldn't expect it. The uni joints in the tailshaft should be able to soak up more angle than is possible from such a tweak. But such a tweak can severely rotate the steering end of the car so that nothing looks straight. And I would not expect you to be able to loosen stuff off and try to relocate it back to where it is supposed to be. You really need to get the car into a chassis/suspension specialist who can measure the car, see how straight it is and work out what can be done, before doing it and measuring the result. You need one of those places that crash repairers use when they are having trouble straightening a car. If you were in Adelaide I could point you at one, but I don't know of any anywhere else.

Thanks for the input. My mate is bringing his 33 around hopefully later today we can do some comparisons with mine and his. I had a look at mine I removed the castor rods and the holes look nice and round. It looks straight but then again as you suggest I need something to compare it to before I give it the tick. Visually there is no paint flaking or creases on it.

These shops you are suggesting, what are they generally called? The only suspension places around me are Pedders and Jax... One of the garages down the road from me has a guy who is quite the genius when it comes to aligning and what not but I don't know if he is capable of doing what you are suggesting.

I've attached 3 images. The holes on the LCA, the length of the LCA(pretty useless) and the area where all the contact is occurring. One thing I did notice was when I disconnected the castor rod, I could very easily wiggle the whole hub left and right. This is probably to be expected though since the castor rod holds everything in place. All the contact occurs when at right full lock with the outer edge of the tyre hitting the firewall.

post-68383-0-30875000-1443324735_thumb.jpgpost-68383-0-76065400-1443324743_thumb.jpgpost-68383-0-78695200-1443324750_thumb.jpg

Edited by SargeRX8

I'll try to answer most of the above even though the earlier parts are not directed at my post.

First, the control arm that the 31 pig reckons you have probably bent is the lower CR, not the upper. So don't play with the camber arms you have installed hoping to work that one out. The only real way to check is to get the arm off and compare it to a known straight one, unless it is so badly rooted that you can see creases in it.

The upright is not the strut tower. The upright is the piece that runs (more or less)) vertically from the lower balljoint up to the upper bearing where the upper control arm attaches at the outer end. It's effectively the hub. Look at an exploded diagram of the Skyline suspension to get a better idea how it all goes together.

To add caster you shorten the rods. Pulls the outer end of the lower control arm forwards. Be aware that you cannot do this shit by eye. If stuff is bent, then you might end up with 2° of caster on one side and 12° on the other in order to get the wheels looking evenly located in the arches.

Exactly as described above.Hard to tell if theres any damage by looking at the pics. I have however been through the exact same scenario in my old 180sx and I ended up replacing both LCA's, the crossmember itself, the castor arms, a tie rod and both rod ends at the end of it all. Plus had to reweld the radiator support etc back on. T'was a moderately big hit.

Check the LCA and the crossmember with known quantities before you do anything else. Then deal with the hub/upright issue. I think that'll either be a rooted kingpin or the hub itself.

I don't think you can fix any of this by adjusting arms. :unhappy:

Comment with your alignment was referring to your alignment sheet.

I would run more camber and castor just as a rule, even on the street.

No point having adjustable arms and then hamstringing it with a shit alignment.

Edited by R31 drift pig

How hard was the crossmember to change? Control arms are easy but supporting the engine and doing all this on the ground, under the car seems tricky. Mind you I've changed my clutch on jack stands so I can probably manage this.

Yeah I wasn't too sure what to do with the alignment. I went to the shop and asked them to remove as much camber as possible to increase tyre life. The shop suggested against it but still did it for me.

What should I ask for as ideal settings for a road car?

I'll be back under the car next Sunday. 6 day working week.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...