Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Abit of background information - I have an rb2530 that's only done about 2500kms. Due to bonnet clearance I'm no longer able to install the timing covers...

Today I was completing a quick lookover though the engine bay and noticed the some rubber marks which have been transferred off my timing belt onto the pulleys... I had a look about 4 weeks ago and these marks weren't existent - since then I've driven the car maybe 2-3 times.

Just looking to get some opinions as to why this may be happening and whether or not anybody else has experienced anything similar!

ff2327799beefb4fd5b6c04a7c9d7307.jpg

66faf7768108bc1d048fb61d8cec5ccf.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/459986-timing-belt-wear-question/
Share on other sites

No idea about the marks, but the first thing I notice is how far back your timing belt is sitting on your cam pulleys. All RB's I have ever see it should be sitting centres or maybe just slightly forward. Yours looks fully back.

No idea if it should make a difference to anything, just something I noticed.

Pardon my delay in response guys - had no idea anybody replied to my post...

I'm running two tensioner bearings... What I also noticed is both of the bearings have identical rubber transfer marks on them. I think that kinda rules out bearing seizure unless they both seizing at the same time.

In terms of the belt sitting towards the rear - I got no idea why it's like that but I've definitely reinstalled the rear shim when I installed the belt...

Also turned the car on and had a close look, it seems as though the belt is loose. Either the belt has stretched or one of the tensioners have loosened up.... Would that cause that severe rubber wear though????

I appreciate the replies guys... Love the feedback this club has given me for the last few years - I'll definitely keep you guys filled in if I make anymore interesting discoveries!

Don't thrash it, had the same thing on my first R32 it was a combo of noisy dry bearing and a loose belt, but not loose enough to beat 2 cars in a race driving to the repairer. Lol

End result was advan performance when they were in silverwater removing my timing cover (rookie error) and revving my car even though we'd already established the issue being the dry bearing.

So I got a phone call saying

"something doesn't sound right with your head, it seems to have bent a valve or valves"

Let's just say from that day on I learnt to do everything on my car myself.

Trust nobody unless there considered a friend.

People are shit sometimes and they will have brainfarts that sometimes cost you unnecessary money.

Sorry for the rant but this issue your having and a few others made me how I am today.

Get it looked at ASAP,

Good luck

Edited by mr skidz

Make sure something hasn't dropped down into the bottom cover. It could be something sitting in between the cover and the back of the belt.

It looks like you have the rear flange on the crank pulley, it has a smaller OD than the front one.

The belt will sit where it wants on the pulley face. The pulleys should all be aligned as long as the added idler is correctly done. The flanges on the crank pulley will prevent it from tracking off the edge of the other ones.

Edited by Fry_33

Haha Ben I thought the same thing when I first uploaded the photos... I took the covers off, all was clear - one thing I did notice though is the belt was slightly under tensioned... This was causing it to walk towards the rear of the gears.

Good news - The black marks are slowly disappearing now after I retensioned the belt however I believe the belt is coated in this tacky rubber material so I'm going to replace it.

One further question, the belt still walks a tiny bit however it now sits in the middle to front region of the cam gears. I can't remember if it used to do that on the rb25... How much walk is considered safe?

  • Like 1

All mine have sat very close to the middle, or just slightly forward +/-2mm

That's where it's sitting now I reckon - hoping it all goes well from here... Kinda shitting my pants because we all know timing belt problems can ruin a mans day! Lol

Thanks for the help guys - I'll definitely keep everybody posted as to how it all goes from here...

Glad to hear it's looking ok now.

Timing belts track due to the way they are made.. the tensile cords inside the belt that give them their strength are twisted glass fibres, when put under tension they want to unwind. This causes a slight tracking force to one side. If you flipped the belt around the other way then it would track in the opposite direction. That's the whole reason for the flanges. If you have any angular misalignment of sprockets then it will force the belt to track harder to one side. For standard setups this is not really an issue as everything is machined and in line. As always, once you start modifying things, that's when you need to be cautious of the tracking. As long as everything is line, tension it up and let the belt do what it wants :)

A mark on the back of the belt normally indicates that something stationary has been in contact with it. That will obviously cause heat and can lead to transfer of heat and possibly rubber to other components like the idlers. That's the main reason for me asking about anything dropping down into the cover.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...