Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Maybe you don't understand, I am wanting to speak to someone here and now so I can ask that person hear and now. Maybe I have specific questions about the engine or their experiences with the engine, what problems they may have had, what things that helped them, etc.

Yoshi, I already told you my personal opinion on exactly how much better an R32 with a 25 in it (and specifically a Neo) a looooog time ago when you first started asking about how to turn your RB20 into the world's biggest nugget. I told you then, many others told you then, and I tell you now, and many others will tell you now, that Nissan should have put the 25 into the R32 right from the start, instead of persisting with the 20. A 32 with a 25 in it is the way they always should have been. Neos are just a whole lot better again (although the improvement from 25 to 25 Neo is much less noticeable than the improvement going from the 20 to the 25).

Edited by GTSBoy
  • Like 1

I read some things about the RB25 and I thought I read several places that something about the oil pump or something to do with the oil that the RB25 has trouble with more compared to the RB20. I've actually heard a few people where I live mention the 25 is not all of that and its keep what I have or go RB26 or GTR(This is from tuning shops also). So I want to hear from people who have the engine in their car and who has done the change so I can ask about how it drives, speed, etc. Reading old posts from years ago(which I have) is not going to completely help because I am not going to try to PM someone or reply to a 2-10 year old posts.

hrms...

no sure what problems... I track my car often enough, it has a completely stock motor and yet to see it explode.. and it makes a lazy 340kW at the rears.

How it drives? I drive it like I stole it, out of corners smashing the limiter.

  • Like 1

25's have more capacity and VCT, of course they are better than rb20's. The oil issues have solutions, other than that if you treat it right it will be fine

I never had issues with my old stock motor running 18psi and 260rwkw. The only reason i changed it with a fresh one is because i wanted to build an engine and thought i may as well make it strong

Seriously. If guys on a Skyline forum where I'd say around half the members have or have had an RB25 are telling you a 25 will be better then a 20, then really what more info do you need?

Its all here to be found if the time comes and if you already know about the oil issues then theres not much more to know as far as im concerned

if you do decide to do the swap though, then make sure you post up a 'how to' and how it worked out for you, so that the information is online somewhere if anyone else ever decides to do it in the future and wants to search for such information.

  • Like 3

if you do decide to do the swap though, then make sure you post up a 'how to' and how it worked out for you, so that the information is online somewhere if anyone else ever decides to do it in the future and wants to search for such information.

Search.......whats that?????

RB20DETs are gay, I had one.. SR20DETs non-VCT makes more torque, hectic a SR20DET VCT makes even more torque.

I've owned a RB20DET so I can bag them out, they're shit.

  • Like 1

I quite liked my stocker RB20 in my old R32, was a good stock motor (ate and spat out a bolt, destroying the stocker turbine) and was good on petrol. But mine wasn't making 400hp.

But since you're going to take the engine out, put an LS1 in.

  • Like 1

Besides the cost of buying the engine, putting it in, and registration fee and higher car taxes of putting a RB25 in my car, I just feel its a pain to have to change the speedo cable, use different types of coil packs, have to have the weird wiring, etc.

If I put a 26 in the car it would be so much easier for certain things and parts able to use between the engines. But unless I get a good working 26 for cheap, I will buy a GTR instead of putting one in my car.

How about the crank collar issue with the 25 if pushing high hp? Is that something that I would not have to worry about unless going high high hp? Is the VCT the thing that really makes the big difference in torque between the 20 and 25?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...