Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys

I have spent ages searching the forums and there is a bit on end float but not a lot on what my options are..

Recently took the R32 GTR in for a major service timing belt, water pump etc and the mechanic told me upon picking it up that there is quote "Crankshaft has excessive end float, thrust washer worn excessively" he went on to say there was 2mm or so in movement from what he could tell. As far as I am aware these guys are reputible and deal with a lot of turbo cars and have had some great reviews through SAU but not sure how well they know the rb26.

It does have a heavy aftermarket clutch (unsure brand) so this could be the source of the why this has occurred maybe?

I guess my main questions are:

1. If the above is correct what are my options? Is there a chance this engine could blow? Its fairly stock and its a fun weekender not a crazy track car.

2. Is there a relatively affordable fix or is this an engine out rebuild scenario like the mechanic is hinting?

Greatly appreciate the advice as this is past my knowledge!

Typo??? Crankshaft.

Has been some discussion on the UK forum regarding Exedy heavy duty clutches.

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/381993-exeddy-stage-2-clutch-wore-crank-thrust-bearing-after-20-miles.html

Wonder how many cars are driving around with no clue as to their crank end float.

Hyundai's get so bad the pick up for the crank sensor can't get a signal and she stops.

For the crank thrust, i mod the thrust bearings for extra oiling on the thrust face (pull needs the mod on the oil pump facing side, push type clutches need the mod on the flywheel facing side).

ACL bearings sort of already have it done, when using ACL bearings i usually open the mod up for more oiling.

The mod is a channel filed into the parting line of the bearings so extra oil can travel to the thrust bearing face.

Yes never start the engine with the clutch down and dont sit at lights with your foot on the clutch, our clutch is a Jim berry 5800lb cover pressure pull type, you know what that baby will be doing to the thrust bearing.....

eQAJJM.jpg

Thanks for the replies guys,

On the actual shop invoice the exact wording is as follows. "Crankshaft has excessive end float, thrust washer worn excessively"

Appreciate the replies and feedback GTR PSI How hard is it to do that work to the bearings? I live on the Sunshine Coast could get the car to Brissy if I can find someone that can do the work!

Show the pic to a good engine builder, they should jerry the moment they see it.

Its done with a small hand file slowly and carefully, taking care not to mark the bearing face and taking care to remove any material that the file may push onto the parting face, i simply do it using a small hand file..

You only make a 45 degree cut and only cut through the bearing excess, still leaving a flat end for the other half of the bearing to crush against.

Best ask the engine builder to examine a ACL bearing under a magnifying glass, and open up their bearing a little more than they have, or to replicate this onto a non ACL bearing.

You will note if you look at that pic that its a 45 degree cut and the end of the bearing is still flat so it can still crush against the other half of the bearing properly.

  • Like 1

Nah, my father was a old school mechanic who use to do it all himself, he always taught me to look at why something broke, find out how to improve it before i replaced it.

By 9 he had me rebuilding engines with him, by 13 he had me modding stock parts by hand (no performance parts for all models back in those days) and rebuilding them myself with him watching on.

By 16 he said he had no more to show me.......and im 51 and still learning.....

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep super expensive, awesome. It would be a cool passion project if I had the money.
    • Getting the setup right, is likely to cost multiples of the purchase price of the vehicle.
    • So it's a ginormous undertaking that will be a massive headache but will be sorta cool if pulled off right. And also expensive. I'm sure it'll be as expensive as buying the car itself. I don't think you could just do this build without upgrading other things to take the extra power. Probably lots of custom stuff as well. All this assuming the person has mechanical knowledge. I'm stupid enough to try it but smart enough to realize there's gonna be mistakes even with an experienced mechanic. I'm a young bloke on minimum wage that gets dopamine from air being moved around and got his knowledge from a Donut video on how engines work.]   Thanks for the response though super informative!
    • Yes, it is entirely possible to twincharge a Skyline. It is not....without problems though. There was a guy did it to an SOHC RB30 (and I think maybe it became or already was a 25/30) in a VL Commode. It was a monster. The idea is that you can run both compressors at relatively low pressure ratios, yet still end up with a quite large total pressure ratio because they multiply, not add, boost levels. So, if the blower is spun to give a 1.4:1 PR (ie, it would make ~40 kPa of boost on its own) and the turbo is set up to give a 1.4:1 PR also, then you don't get 40+40 = 80 kPa of boost, you get 1.4*1.4, which is pretty close to 100 kPa of boost. It's free real estate! This only gets better as the PRs increase. If both are set up to yield about 1.7 PR, which is only about 70 kPa or 10ish psi of boost each, you actually end up with about 1.9 bar of boost! So, inevitably it was a bit of a monster. The blower is set up as the 2nd compressor, closest to the motor, because it is a positive displacement unit, so to get the benefit of putting it in series with another compressor, it has to go second. If you put it first, it has to be bigger, because it will be breathing air at atmospheric pressure. The turbo's compressor ends up needing to be a lot larger than you'd expect, and optimised to be efficient at large mass flows and low PRs. The turbo's exhaust side needs to be quite relaxed, because it's not trying to provide the power to produce all the boost, and it has to handle ALL the exhaust flow. I think you need a much bigger wastegate than you might expect. Certainly bigger than for an engine just making the same power level turbo only. The blower effectively multiplies the base engine size. So if you put a 1.7 PR blower on a 2.5L Skyline, it's like turboing a 4.2L engine. Easy to make massive power. Plus, because the engine is blown, the blower makes boost before the turbo can even think about making boost, so it's like having that 4.2L engine all the way from idle. Fattens the torque delivery up massively. But, there are downsides. The first is trying to work out how to size the turbo according to the above. The second is that you pretty much have to give up on aircon. There's not enough space to mount everything you need. You might be able to go elec power steering pump, hidden away somewhere. but it would still be a struggle to get both the AC and the blower on the same side of the engine. Then, you have to ponder whether you want to truly intercool the thing. Ideally you would put a cooler between the turbo and the blower, so as to drop the heat out of it and gain even more benefit from the blower's positive displacement nature. But that would really need to be a water to air core, because you're never going to find enough room to run 2 sets of boost pipes out to air to air cores in the front of the car. But you still need to aftercool after the blower, because both these compressors will add a lot of heat, and you wil have the same temperature (more or less) as if you produced all that boost with a single stage, and no one in their right mind would try to run a petrol engine on high boost without a cooler (unless not using petrol, which we shall ignore for the moment). I'm of the opinnion that 2x water to air cores in the bay and 2x HXs out the front is probably the only sensible way to avoid wasting a lot of room trying to fit in long runs of boost pipe. But the struggle to locate everything in the limited space available would still be a pretty bad optimisation problem. If it was an OEM, they'd throw 20 engineers at it for a year and let them test out 30 ideas before deciding on the best layout. And they'd have the freedom to develop bespoke castings and the like, for manifolds, housings, connecting pipes to/from compressors and cores. A single person in a garage can either have one shot at it and live with the result, or spend 5 years trying to get it right.
    • Good to know, thank you!
×
×
  • Create New...