Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Come on fella's, the GTiR is not that ugly!!! It is short, fat and angry just like it's owner. I must say that I really enjoyed the cruise and for a change I was not dissapointed at the pace set. Next time we go out in the dry so the poor GTR can have a chance at opening it up. My hat is off to ?Shane? (SIR 033) for keeping that thing on the road. Power + rain = pain! Just don't forget that the GTiR is not the little brother of a GTR, it's more of an annoying cousin!

PS I need to practice on Nismo Stu's roads a bit more because playing catch-up bites.

Hey All,

Thanks all for turning up to the cruise. I was very suprised to see so many on a shitty weather night. Still can't believe the fog on the first stage it was terrible.

Glen the person you are mentioning is Mick in the 33GTR, Shane drives the 32GTR. Glad to see you out and about on the cruise. That last stage is my hunting ground and I know it very, very well. I was amazed at how much I can push the WRX in the wet. I wouldn't even dream of doing it that quick in a RWD. Hope to see you out on the next one we organise.

Stu.

Come on fella's, the GTiR is not that ugly!!! It is short, fat and angry just like it's owner. I must say that I really enjoyed the cruise and for a change I was not dissapointed at the pace set. Next time we go out in the dry so the poor GTR can have a chance at opening it up. My hat is off to ?Shane? (SIR 033) for keeping that thing on the road. Power + rain = pain! Just don't forget that the GTiR is not the little brother of a GTR, it's more of an annoying cousin!  

PS I need to practice on Nismo Stu's roads a bit more because playing catch-up bites.

Hey Irish, I thought you switched to using contacts mate? Your avatar photo is exactly what you look like except for the glasses :D

The 33 GT-R belongs to trick (SAU nick) or Mick. Shane's was the 32 GT-R.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...