Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yea i understand that i dont have the fuel system for anything more then 18 psi.

what? lol

I run 875cc Siemens Deka IV and it is only hitting like 89% duty cycle at 24psi

I prefer to tune with loads of boost but very lazy timing rather than loads of timing but not so much boost.

Because you're on E85, EGTS are shit low

Guess i just have to wait to see what the cyle is when there on the dyno.

I thought the whole idea was for heap of timing with e85 isnt timming safer then boost.

Id like to think with like 23 psi it would go over 400 but studs would be realy helpful for that

What power are you making with them only at 89 %

Edited by Ke55pig

I don't know how much I'm making but last time I put it on a mainline 2WD dyno it made 340kW but only with 22psi but that was with stock stocks a little more timing. I'll shaved off the timing and added more boost for the track, against what everyone would think lol.

However I've got ARP studs and I've over torqued them to 108nm (non 2000 studs)

Out of interest, what do you reckon a 20G will make on e85 on a 25?

310 to 320rwkws should be a breeze with the 10cm housing. I made 310 on an RB20 with an 8cm housing

If its a street car put an 8cm housing on it and with E85 if there is a tad too much back pressure it wont matter. on 98 the backpressure woudl hold it back and make it puing with boost and exhaust but with E85... I know the 8cm housing on the 20G on my RB25 was EPIC.

310 to 320rwkws should be a breeze with the 10cm housing. I made 310 on an RB20 with an 8cm housing

If its a street car put an 8cm housing on it and with E85 if there is a tad too much back pressure it wont matter. on 98 the backpressure woudl hold it back and make it puing with boost and exhaust but with E85... I know the 8cm housing on the 20G on my RB25 was EPIC.

I have a L2 20G 10cm. I was hopeful of around 330-340 with the cams Ive put in, camtech 264/268 9mm's. Cant seem to find a lot about the l2 20g on a 25 for some reason, mostly the 25g/t67.

I making 340 on mailine roller on 98

Ive been in a r34 with a t67 25g 10cm, and less engine work done (Injectors/FMIC/Power FC/Z32/Nismo Pump/Exhaust and turbo kit) and it was pretty damn good on the road, made 300ish on 98, so I can only imagine how good yours'll be with the extra gear on e85.

Edited by R31 drift pig

Yea looking foward to it its bye no means slow just needs more mid more then happy to make no more peak on e85.

It will be on dyno to sort out splutter jolting issue as soon as goes into positive pressure/boost.

New cas new afm new coils and new loom didnt fix hopeing its a easy fix fingers crossed

Edited by Ke55pig

Hey mate, just looking at this. In your first post with the dyno sheet, the AFR's get REALLY rich as your starting to make power it looks like 11.4:1 ish but for some reason, being not enough time invested by the tuner or unstable fuel pressure the AFR's are all over the shop.

If the tuner can get a stable 12:1 AFR's while under full load that will also help with the miss and help in ramping up your mid range( it's not going to be a crazy gain but power delivery will be a lot more smoother and keep the heat higher in your exhaust to allow for greater thermal expansion and inturn turn the turbo faster)

Just a few things that seem to jump out at me.

Good luck with E85, you won't look back.

Going rich as you reach peak torque and at peak torque will prevent knock, especially on 98RON. I assume that was done on purpose.

On E85, that doesn't matter so much...

I personally tune my car and my mates car using the same technique.. as it approaches max torque and is at max torque AFRs are in the 11.5 region and as torque dies down it leans up to nearly 12

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
  • Create New...