Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a 1990 R32 GTR, and I need to replace the kingpin bearings. In digging around in many of the threads on this topic, there seems to be a general unavailability of the lower bearing.

Front what I have collected so far from these threads:

Upper Bearing Nissan Part Number: 40030-33P07

Lower Bearing Nissan Part Number: 40030-60U00

Upper Seal Nissan Part Number: 40579-33P01

Lower Seal Nissan Part Number: 40290-33P00

Proposed Upper Bearing Mfg Part Number: NSK-6204V or NTN-2N0804

Proposed Lower Bearing Mfg Part Number: NTN-6907LB

I pulled the arms off my car and took at look at the bearings, and I found the following:

Upper Bearing Mfg Part Number: NTN-6204LB (Not NSK-6204V)

Lower Bearing Mfg Part Number: NSK, BAT31-1B , S32 (Those were the three marks on the casing).

The Upper Bearing, if it is NSK-6204V or NTN-6204LB, is something easy to find. There are multiple online bearing places here in the US that have them. I can also order the part number listed above from Nissan ( 40030-33P07 ). It is listed as a part for the TT 300ZX.

The Lower Bearing I have is an NSK one, with what looks like a part number of NSK-BAT31-1B. I can't find a reference for that part number anywhere. If I look up the NTN-6907LB I do find some chinese sites that reference it, but nothing that looks ligit.

Here is what I am curious about: If I search for the Nissan part number listed above ( 40030-60U00 ), it is easy to find as it is a Nissan 300ZX part. I can order that from a dealer here.

In a few threads there is mention that the 'nissan part number' is not correct, although I have not seen a reference to exactly which part number everyone is talking about. I could just go ahead and order the nissan part and see what I get.

Does anyone have a definitive answer about the correctness of the two nissan part numbers? ( 40030-33P07 and 40030-60U00 )? Any other sources for the lower bearing?

Cheers,

Jeff Sponaugle

  • Like 1

One other note: I measured both the kingpin and well as that lower bearing from my car and they confirm some other measurements I read online. It is a 31mm inside and 58mm outside. That is a pretty atypical size, especially the 31mm part. That may explain the BAT31-1B part number I see on it.

The 6907 number referenced above translates to a 35mm inside and 55mm outside bearing, regardless of NTN of NSK.

The kingpin part itself, at least for the 300ZX is listed as 40022-60U05. According to several online sources that is the correct R32 part number. If the 300zx and R32 part numbers are indeed the same then the lower bearing used on the 300ZX must also be 31mm inside diameter.. Of course that doesn't mean the outside diameter is the same!

One last option I could consider: There are some readily available 58mm outside and 28mm inside bearings of the same thickness and construction. It would be very easy to take the two king pins and have them turned down from 31mm to 28mm and use those bearings. Thoughts?

Jeff

Edited by sponaugle

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The larger TB I had on the SS was a pain to get to idle right, but, that was cable In the end they just raised the idle up a couple of hundred RPM so it was happy idling away either in gear or in park (slush box life) I'm curious on how my NC will idle with the new intake, larger TB, and cams that are currently going in/on, but I have faith that MX5 Mania will sort this "electronical" "black magic" out the best they can in the tune with a electronic TB Sometimes I wish I knew more about the intricacies of tuning, but most of the time I don't because I know it would hurt my brain 馃ぃ
    • That's the thing. Cam is smaller than before.. though the old cam was +6 degrees advanced. We're talking huge changes here, the narrowbands want to trim out 20% of fuel and pull the (wideband) idle to like 16.0 AFR or such. One side is a little more trimmy than the other. Think along the lines of ~20% to ~15-18%. Unfortunately my scouring of the internet hasn't really found anyone with this issue. People either just disable NB's or have them wildly different, where one is -20% and the other is +20 or 0 (i.e a sensor is just dead/wiring is just busted). Turning them off and relying on the base map only results in the wideband reporting at about 14.0 with the Varex closed. It'd be a little leaner (closer to 14.7ish) with the Varex open. I know I can just change the switch points so that the narrowbands agree with the wideband, but it's still odd. Both of them are reading voltage, it's just that they're reading quite high mv, in the ~800 region. It's just odd. This was with the IAT fudged to report it was about ~22 degrees which is my guesstimation of the temperature in the room. I have an OEM sensor ready to try tonight, which is slow and crap - but .. worked last time I used it. Sadly I am aware that idle tuning with the big TB is going to be a PITA and I look 'forward' to many hours spent stalling or stumbling idle or delving into drivability things.
    • The GTR strut brace clears the new manifold.. by about 0.5mm. So this means I need to buy an OEM GTT Strut brace (again), which will clear the new manifold, but not the bonnet vents. I guess I can sell the GTR Strut brace with the bonnet with the vents as a package deal as someone will need this one day. So my choices are vented bonnet but no strut brace, or GTR Bonnet with OEM brace (which I have to buy) but is bright red instead of the same colour as the rest of the car, which means the entire front end of the car will just be red until it goes back to paint jail. In other news the engine starts and doesn't leak. Why both O2 narrowband sensors think the tune is rich AF I do not know. The idle is also pretty shitty and my expensive IAT sensor from the USA is dead. The car sounds awful. But I assume or at least hope this is due to the many exhaust leaks, and the concrete garage it is in, sitting there with 0 intake bolted to it, and no bonnet or panels or anything to stop the induction/intake sound which is about 200db.
    • C'mon! At least come kicking and screaming into the 2000s. BA XR8 bulge.
  • Create New...