Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They do work, I was just forward planning for turbo swap.

I understand you "can" go beyond 300kw with standard AFMs, but life is easier with the Nismo units.

I didn't think stock AFMs were worth much? Aren't the Nismo one's 4-500 a piece?

Those R35 MAFs are cheap. Never seen those before. So you mount 2 of those to generic pipes and bolt to the airbox, get some plugs and rewire the loom to suit the plug then tune?

How would they go in 65mm pipe though, same as the Nismo ones. As I've got an ARC induction box and will likely stick with that or go a stock airbox.

$350 each from Perfect Run before postage and stuff. Easier to bolt on the Nismo's as they directly replace OEM, plugs and everything are the same if you want to keep AFM's. An alternative is to get an ECU that uses a MAP sensor and just keep the AFM's on there inside an airbox so it looks factory.

$350 each from Perfect Run before postage and stuff. Easier to bolt on the Nismo's as they directly replace OEM, plugs and everything are the same if you want to keep AFM's. An alternative is to get an ECU that uses a MAP sensor and just keep the AFM's on there inside an airbox so it looks factory.

Cheers

Still more than just having the standard ones re-done. Postage is free for me (when sending).

I also already have the PFC.

Using the R35 AFMs in any size pipe is trivial with Nistune. You just create a suitable VQ curve. You are supposed to be able to arbitrarily make an AFM curve in the PFC too, so it shouldn't be a hassle. There was an extensive discussion on this exact topic on here a year or 3 ago. Search it up.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...