Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fellas!

I have been contemplating how it is I will gain my Low-Mid range power back on the RB20. Of course even with boost sub 5k rpm she's not doing much, but without boost you might as well equip your car with chess board for you and your mate.

After thinking about quick spool valves, nitrous and high compression pistons(built bottom end) I started looked into VGT turbos (Variable Geometry Turbos) as most of you already know about.

It turns out we are on the cusp sort of speak with these turbos and there relevance in production vehicles.

Diesel engine makers and large North American companies have been equipping their production vehicles with these VGT turbos for last 5-10 years. Unfortunately "coking" (carbon build up) in diesel engines can cause failure to units and their veins.

Some initial fears with these VGT units on gasoline engines was the increase in EGT's and impact it may have on the vein system. However Volkswagon and Porsche among others (Honda - 1980's legend) have been using these units on gasoline engines in recent times. With the ability to build boost in neutral we are dealing with a new era in turbo charging. For me this alone eliminates a need for launch control as power can be had off the line!

What I have come across so far as a viable replacement for my Hy35 is the Holset HE351VE with it's simplistic and rudimentary design. It seems very unlikely to fail from heat. The only concern i have short of converting it from electronic vein control to pneumatically actuated would be that the unit is still far too large for the RB20, as the HY35 is laggy enough. My concern would be that the only gain would be more flow on the high end in which case I would not use. The theory behind these units really make sense for the RB20 but I am unsold on the idea that the HE351VE is the unit for this engine.

I am interested to know of other users on here using these turbos with the RB's!. And for those of you that are unsure of what I am speaking of please see the photo below.The holset design is a bit different with far less moving parts.

Any comments, concerns or discussion is welcomed.

post-132888-0-64439000-1449622657_thumb.jpg

nissan navara's have variable vane setup i believe...

The thing about Diesel turbos is that the factory models are very very small for the displacement in comparison to a gasoline engine. The hy35 (HE341) comes from a 5.9L. So a 2.5L diesel turbo seems quite small (Garrett GT2052V)

A twin setup would be interesting i suppose

The petrol ones in use have rather exotic materials associated with the vanes and some clever engineering to prevent the unavoidably high EGTs from causing problems. Diesel variable turbos are just not in the same league.

The control systems have to be fairly thoroughly thought out and it's nowhere near as simple as just sensing a pressure or two and using a pneumatic actuator powered by boost to move shit.

Consequently, short of a well thought out achievable control system and access to turbos that are actually suited to petrol EGTs, we're still not rally there yet when it comes to doing aftermarket/retro/DIY style systems.

I think in this day and age of arduino boards and so on that it should be possible to come up with a suitable control scheme that you would actually have a chance of writing the code for and being able to interact with the real world with. Use some sort of electro-mech servos to achieve linear or rotary actuation for the vane system. Use fairly readily available pressure sensors for control inputs, probably also with tacho input from the ECU. But it all sounds like a lot of work if you're starting from scratch. OK if you like a project, not so much if you just want to achieve a goal. I haven't looked at what people have actually been trying in this field in the last couple of years though, so perhaps you'd want to do some research.

I would say that the smartest thing you could do with an RB20 if you want some response and low end torque would be to supercharge it. Just plain supercharge if your power goals are not excessive. Otherwise a decent twin-charge setup using a well matched blower that would give you 10 psi off idle and a f**koff big turbo (well, big for an RB20....say something based on a 3582 or something similar) to really leverage the 1st stage compression from the blower. There is info on here and on PF regarding Stocky's VL Commodore with that setup on an RB30. It was a bit of an animal.

GTSboy has covered the salient points well.

Yes they've been in diesels for many years and almost broke Cummins. Owners ditched the VGT in favour of old fashioned waste gate style and real engine life returned. Precise control of the thing, even within the tight confines of a truck's usable rpm is extremely difficult and of course carbon build up etc does not make for long service intervals.

Still OEM on small capacity diesel cars where an owner who gets over 200,000k's thinks it's amazing. Us old time diesel owners aren't interested in anything until it's done 1,000,000 trouble free.

The complicated sequential turbo setup on the 2JZ supplies seamless power all the way to the top, but it must weigh 100kg !!!

Yep....

$16000 USD, to make a commodore (Pontiac G8) go 11.08 at 130.....

errrr......seems like really good valve considering with just a cam change it would probably run 11's too.........or for 16k you could have a built motor and a promod88 and run 8s......

Hypergear have one.. but not in production, just a prototype for them to ticker with...

:D yes got few working prototypes that actually makes very noticeable differences. They are best working with VCT motors. I've tried them with RB26 engine, they wanted surge, as in there are too much air for the engine to swallow with low RPM. Result wasn't as good as when they were on my RB25. I think those systems needs to be individually developed on given engines.

The petrol ones in use have rather exotic materials associated with the vanes and some clever engineering to prevent the unavoidably high EGTs from causing problems. Diesel variable turbos are just not in the same league.

The control systems have to be fairly thoroughly thought out and it's nowhere near as simple as just sensing a pressure or two and using a pneumatic actuator powered by boost to move shit.

Consequently, short of a well thought out achievable control system and access to turbos that are actually suited to petrol EGTs, we're still not rally there yet when it comes to doing aftermarket/retro/DIY style systems.

I think in this day and age of arduino boards and so on that it should be possible to come up with a suitable control scheme that you would actually have a chance of writing the code for and being able to interact with the real world with. Use some sort of electro-mech servos to achieve linear or rotary actuation for the vane system. Use fairly readily available pressure sensors for control inputs, probably also with tacho input from the ECU. But it all sounds like a lot of work if you're starting from scratch. OK if you like a project, not so much if you just want to achieve a goal. I haven't looked at what people have actually been trying in this field in the last couple of years though, so perhaps you'd want to do some research.

I would say that the smartest thing you could do with an RB20 if you want some response and low end torque would be to supercharge it. Just plain supercharge if your power goals are not excessive. Otherwise a decent twin-charge setup using a well matched blower that would give you 10 psi off idle and a f**koff big turbo (well, big for an RB20....say something based on a 3582 or something similar) to really leverage the 1st stage compression from the blower. There is info on here and on PF regarding Stocky's VL Commodore with that setup on an RB30. It was a bit of an animal.

Hey I hear ya, A project with a goal is where I am always at. I do not find this daunting at all, it will work (And work good at that) if the proper unit is selected. There is three ways to control these either with a boost sensing actuator (wastegate actuator), aftermarket standalone controllers or like you have said custom arduino boards.

The Holset HE351VE Design uses veins that are connected via a telescopic ring. (See picture below), I have even seen a rotary with some of the highest egt's of any engine run this turbo for some time. Other diesel designs however do seem liable to excess egt's. Most of the gasoline turbos are using titanium bits form what I have researched.

*Edit - including picture. Also the turbos usually come with the electronics/servos and just require some sort of computer to tell them what to do.

IMG_0001.jpg

The turbo actually has guides for the fins on the exhaust housing.

Edited by rx-line

have you looked at what Aerocharger have been doing? http://www.aerocharger.com

I have, we have a motorcycle/machine shop and the aerochargers have been round for a while.. As of now a Turbo I4 Kawasaki in the 8 seconds and a supercharged harley soon to be in the same class. None of which use aerochargers atm.

Honnestly, imho, i wouldn't advice an vgt turbo on a petrol engine. As you say porsche ect uses them. But they don't last as long as a normal turbo, even porsche doesn't use them anymore in the new porsche turbo, if i remember correct, they're using a twin setup now ...

much easier ways to get your torque low down, like a 25.....but thats boring.

ima go grab some snacks for the watching.... continue your progress.......

Although it would the first RB25DET in an FB rx7 i woud think, I like the RB20det and already has proven itself to be faster than vettes and camaros. Plus I have a spare RB20 anyway. The 25's go for around $3k with trannys here. A variable vein turbo will not cost me much as I will just sell the near brand new HY35.

The ported head I'm building should compliment more boost down low as well.

Here's a rotary with the HE351VE, I think he blew the engine recently.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In this thing about this 100% renewal energy stuff I hear no one really talking about anything other than power and fuel really Power and fuel, whilst being a huge part of how we use the billion year old Dinosaur juices, are only 2, of the probably thousands of things that we need to use it for in the chemicals industries for making nearly everything we use nowadays I'm all for a clean planet, but if we want to continue to have all the day to day appliances and stuff that we rely on everyday we will still need fossil fuels Whilst I do love science, and how it can bring innovation, there's really a limit to how far it can go in relation to "going green" As for EV's, unless your charging of your own solar panels, it isn't helping the environment when you consider the the batteries, the mining processes required,  the manufacturing process required, and how long a batteries (read: the vehicle) lasts long term If I was supreme dictator of the world, I would ban the use of sugar for fizzy drinks and food additives and use that for ethanol manufacturing, petrol engines would be happier, and people would be alot healthier  Disclaimer: Whiskey manufacturing would still be required, so says the supreme dictator of the world Same same for all the vegetable oils that get pumped into all our food, use that for bio diesel Disclaimer: the supreme dictator would still require olive oil to dip his bread in This would take some of heat off the use of the use of fossil fuels which are required for everything we use, unless you want to go back to pre 1800 for heat and power, or the early 1900's for plastics and every thing else that has come from cracking ethylene  Would I be a fair and just dictator, nope, and I would probably be assassinated within my first few months, but would my cunning plan work, maybe, for a while, maybe not Meh, in the end in an over opinionated mildly educated arsehole typing out my vomit on my mobile phone, which wouldn't be possible without fossil fuels And if your into conspiracies, we only need the fossil fuels to last until a meteor hits, or thermonuclear annihilation, that would definitely fix our need for fossil fuels for manufacturing and power issues for quite some time  Meh, time for this boomer to cook his lunch on his electric stove and then maybe go for a drive in my petrol car, for fun    
    • It really helps that light duty vehicles have absolutely appalling average efficiency due to poor average load. Like 25% average brake thermal efficiency when peak is somewhere around 38% these days. So even a 60% BTE stationary natural gas plant + transmission and charging losses still doing much better with an EV than conventional ICE. And that's before we get into renewables or "low carbon nonrenewable" nuclear which makes it a no-brainer, basically. In commercial aircraft or heavy duty diesel pulling some ridiculous amount of weight across a continent the numbers are much more difficult to make work. I honestly think in 5-10 years we will still be seeing something like the Achates opposed piston diesels in most semi trucks running on a blend of renewable/biodiesel. Applications where the energy density of diesel is just too critical to compromise. CARB is running trials of those engines right now to evaluate in real world drayage ops, probably because they're noticing that the numbers just don't work for electrification unless our plan is to make glorified electric trains with high voltage wires running along every major highway and only a token amount of battery to make it 30 miles or something like that after detaching. Transport emissions is not insignificant especially in the US, but yes there's a lot of industrial processes that also need to be decarbonized. I agree the scale of the problem is pretty insane but EDF managed to generate ~360 TWh from their nuclear reactors last year and this is with decades of underinvestment after the initial big push in the 70s and 80s. I don't think the frame of reference should be solar-limited. France is not exactly a big country either. Maybe it doesn't work everywhere, but it doesn't have to either. We just can't live off of fracking forever and expect things to be ok.
    • Yeah, all the crude is used for fuels and petrochem feedstocks (pesticides, many other chemicals, etc etc). But increasingly over the last few decades, much of the petrochem synthessis has started with methane because NG has been cheaper than oil, cleaner and easier and more consistent to work with, etc etc etc. So it's really had to say what the fraction either way is. Suffice to say - the direct fuels fraction is not insigificant. Heavy transport uses excruciatingly large amounts. Diesel is wasted in jet heaters in North American garages and workshops, thrown down drill holes in quarries, pissed all over the wall to provide electricity to certain outback communities, etc etc. Obviously road transport, and our pet project, recreational consumption camouflaged as road transport, is a smaller fraction of the total liquid HC consumption again. If you're talking aboust Aussie cars' contribution to the absolute total CO2 production of the country, then of course our share of the cubic mile of coal that is used for power generation, metallurgy, etc adds up to a big chunk. Then there is the consumption of timber. Did you know that the production of silicon metal, for example, is done in Australia by using hardwood? And f**king lots and lots and lots of hardwood at that. Until recently, it was f**king jarrah! There are many such sneaky contributors to CO2 production in industry and farming. NG is used in massive quantities in Australia, for power gen, for running huge water pumps (like, 1-2MW sized caterpillar V16 engines running flat out pumping water) for places like mine sites and minerals/metals refineries. And there are just a huge number of those sort of things going on quietly in the background. So NG use is a big fraction of total CO2 production here. I mean, shit, I personally design burners that are used in furnaces here in Oz that use multiple MW of gas all day every day. The largest such that I've done (not here in Oz) was rated to 150MW. One. Single. Gas burner. In a cement clinker kiln. There are thousands of such things out there in the world. There are double digits of them just here in Oz. (OK< just barely double digits now that a lot of them have shut - and they are all <100MW). But it's all the same to me. People in the car world (like this forum's users) would like to think that you only have to create an industrial capability to replace the fuel that they will be using in 10 years time, and imagine that everyone else will be driving EVs. And while the latter part of that is largely true, the liquid HC fuel industry as a whole is so much more massive than the bit used for cars, that there will be no commercial pressure to produce "renewable" "synthetic" fuels just for cars, when 100x that much would still be being burnt straight from the well. You have to replace it all, or you're not doing what is required. And then you get back to my massive numbers. People don't handle massive numbers at all well. Once you get past about 7 or 8 zeros, it becomes meaningless for most people.
    • @GTSBoy out of the cubic mile of crude oil we burn each year, I wonder how much of that is actually used for providing petrol and diesel.   From memory the figure for cars in Australia, is that they only add up to about 2 to 3% of our CO2 production. Which means something else here is burning a shit tonne of stuff to make CO2, and we're not really straight up burning oil everywhere, so our CO2 production is coming from elsewhere too.   Also we should totally just run thermal energy from deep in the ground. That way we can start to cool the inside of the planet and reverse global warming (PS, this last paragraph is a total piss take)
    • As somebody who works in the energy sector and lives in a subzero climate, i'm convinced EV's will never be the bulk of our transport.  EV battery and vehicle companies over here have been going bankrupt on a weekly basis the last year. 
×
×
  • Create New...